EPYC 4465P vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D

AMD

EPYC 4465P

12 Cores24 Thrd65 WWMax: 5.4 GHz2025

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen 9 7900X3D

12 Cores24 Thrd120 WWMax: 5.6 GHz2023

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 4465P

2025

Why buy it

  • +0% higher PassMark.
  • Costs $200 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
  • Delivers 50.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 125.9 vs 83.8 PassMark/$ ($399 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
  • Draws 65W instead of 120W, a 55W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7900X3D across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Ryzen 9 7900X3D

2023

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +22.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (50,213 vs 50,216).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 83.8 vs 125.9 PassMark/$ ($599 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
  • 84.6% higher power demand at 120W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 4465P better than Ryzen 9 7900X3D?
Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. EPYC 4465P makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 9 7900X3D is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 4465P is the better fit. You are getting 0% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
EPYC 4465P is the smarter buy today. EPYC 4465P is $200 cheaper on MSRP at $399 MSRP versus $599 MSRP, and it gives you 0% better PassMark. The trade-off is that Ryzen 9 7900X3D is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 22.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 50.1% better value on MSRP (125.9 vs 83.8 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 4465P is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2023) and more multi-core headroom with 12 cores / 24 threads instead of 12/24. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetEPYC 4465PRyzen 9 7900X3D
1080p
low271 FPS272 FPS
medium247 FPS249 FPS
high211 FPS212 FPS
ultra183 FPS186 FPS
1440p
low255 FPS264 FPS
medium208 FPS217 FPS
high165 FPS172 FPS
ultra148 FPS155 FPS
4K
low176 FPS183 FPS
medium144 FPS150 FPS
high108 FPS113 FPS
ultra97 FPS101 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetEPYC 4465PRyzen 9 7900X3D
1080p
low678 FPS845 FPS
medium581 FPS689 FPS
high436 FPS511 FPS
ultra376 FPS423 FPS
1440p
low570 FPS679 FPS
medium506 FPS578 FPS
high393 FPS445 FPS
ultra312 FPS345 FPS
4K
low321 FPS379 FPS
medium289 FPS326 FPS
high256 FPS286 FPS
ultra219 FPS241 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetEPYC 4465PRyzen 9 7900X3D
1080p
low849 FPS1025 FPS
medium678 FPS1164 FPS
high600 FPS1101 FPS
ultra514 FPS875 FPS
1440p
low678 FPS972 FPS
medium542 FPS878 FPS
high469 FPS805 FPS
ultra397 FPS656 FPS
4K
low484 FPS597 FPS
medium400 FPS518 FPS
high360 FPS465 FPS
ultra302 FPS393 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetEPYC 4465PRyzen 9 7900X3D
1080p
low1087 FPS1255 FPS
medium980 FPS1015 FPS
high857 FPS993 FPS
ultra772 FPS865 FPS
1440p
low852 FPS1037 FPS
medium756 FPS899 FPS
high662 FPS774 FPS
ultra574 FPS649 FPS
4K
low626 FPS761 FPS
medium560 FPS664 FPS
high494 FPS578 FPS
ultra428 FPS437 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 4465P and Ryzen 9 7900X3D

AMD

EPYC 4465P

The EPYC 4465P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 May 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Grado (2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 50,216 points. Launch price was $399.

AMD

Ryzen 9 7900X3D

The Ryzen 9 7900X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.6 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 50,213 points. Launch price was $599.

Processing Power

Both the EPYC 4465P and Ryzen 9 7900X3D share an identical 12-core/24-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the EPYC 4465P versus 5.6 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7900X3D — a 3.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 7900X3D (base: 3.4 GHz vs 4.4 GHz). The EPYC 4465P uses the Grado (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen 9 7900X3D uses Raphael (2023−2025) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4465P scores 50,216 against the Ryzen 9 7900X3D's 50,213 — a 0% lead for the EPYC 4465P. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 4465P vs 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 7900X3D.

FeatureEPYC 4465PRyzen 9 7900X3D
Cores / Threads
12 / 24
12 / 24
Boost Clock
5.4 GHz
5.6 GHz+4%
Base Clock
3.4 GHz
4.4 GHz+29%
L3 Cache
64 MB (total)
128 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
1 MB (per core)
Process
4 nm-20%
5 nm, 6 nm
Architecture
Grado (2025)
Raphael (2023−2025)
PassMark
50,216
50,213
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the AM5 socket with PCIe 4.0. Both support up to 5200 memory speed. Both support up to 128 of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 28 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: AM5 (EPYC 4465P) and AM5 (Ryzen 9 7900X3D).

FeatureEPYC 4465PRyzen 9 7900X3D
Socket
AM5
AM5
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed
5200
5200
Max RAM Capacity
128
128
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
28
28
🔧

Advanced Features

Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V virtualization. Both include integrated graphics AMD Radeon Graphics (EPYC 4465P) and AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 9 7900X3D) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: EPYC 4465P rivals Core i7-14700K; Ryzen 9 7900X3D rivals Core i7-14700K.

FeatureEPYC 4465PRyzen 9 7900X3D
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
AMD Radeon Graphics
AMD Radeon Graphics
Unlocked
Yes
Yes
AVX-512
Yes
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V
VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V
💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 4465P launched at $399 MSRP, while the Ryzen 9 7900X3D debuted at $599. On MSRP ($399 vs $599), the EPYC 4465P is $200 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4465P delivers 125.9 pts/$ vs 83.8 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 7900X3D — making the EPYC 4465P the 40.1% better value option.

FeatureEPYC 4465PRyzen 9 7900X3D
MSRP
$399-33%
$599
Performance per Dollar
125.9+50%
83.8
Release Date
2025
2023