
EPYC 4465P
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 7900X3D
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 4465P
2025Why buy it
- ✅+0% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $200 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 50.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 125.9 vs 83.8 PassMark/$ ($399 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 120W, a 55W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7900X3D across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Ryzen 9 7900X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +22.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (50,213 vs 50,216).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 83.8 vs 125.9 PassMark/$ ($599 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ❌84.6% higher power demand at 120W vs 65W.
EPYC 4465P
2025Ryzen 9 7900X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅+0% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $200 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 50.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 125.9 vs 83.8 PassMark/$ ($399 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 120W, a 55W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +22.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7900X3D across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (50,213 vs 50,216).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 83.8 vs 125.9 PassMark/$ ($599 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ❌84.6% higher power demand at 120W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 4465P better than Ryzen 9 7900X3D?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 4465P | Ryzen 9 7900X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 271 FPS | 272 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 249 FPS |
| high | 211 FPS | 212 FPS |
| ultra | 183 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 255 FPS | 264 FPS |
| medium | 208 FPS | 217 FPS |
| high | 165 FPS | 172 FPS |
| ultra | 148 FPS | 155 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 176 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 97 FPS | 101 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 4465P | Ryzen 9 7900X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 678 FPS | 845 FPS |
| medium | 581 FPS | 689 FPS |
| high | 436 FPS | 511 FPS |
| ultra | 376 FPS | 423 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 570 FPS | 679 FPS |
| medium | 506 FPS | 578 FPS |
| high | 393 FPS | 445 FPS |
| ultra | 312 FPS | 345 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 321 FPS | 379 FPS |
| medium | 289 FPS | 326 FPS |
| high | 256 FPS | 286 FPS |
| ultra | 219 FPS | 241 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 4465P | Ryzen 9 7900X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 849 FPS | 1025 FPS |
| medium | 678 FPS | 1164 FPS |
| high | 600 FPS | 1101 FPS |
| ultra | 514 FPS | 875 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 678 FPS | 972 FPS |
| medium | 542 FPS | 878 FPS |
| high | 469 FPS | 805 FPS |
| ultra | 397 FPS | 656 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 597 FPS |
| medium | 400 FPS | 518 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 465 FPS |
| ultra | 302 FPS | 393 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 4465P | Ryzen 9 7900X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1087 FPS | 1255 FPS |
| medium | 980 FPS | 1015 FPS |
| high | 857 FPS | 993 FPS |
| ultra | 772 FPS | 865 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 852 FPS | 1037 FPS |
| medium | 756 FPS | 899 FPS |
| high | 662 FPS | 774 FPS |
| ultra | 574 FPS | 649 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 626 FPS | 761 FPS |
| medium | 560 FPS | 664 FPS |
| high | 494 FPS | 578 FPS |
| ultra | 428 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 4465P and Ryzen 9 7900X3D

EPYC 4465P
EPYC 4465P
The EPYC 4465P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 May 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Grado (2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 50,216 points. Launch price was $399.


Ryzen 9 7900X3D
Ryzen 9 7900X3D
The Ryzen 9 7900X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.6 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 50,213 points. Launch price was $599.
Processing Power
Both the EPYC 4465P and Ryzen 9 7900X3D share an identical 12-core/24-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the EPYC 4465P versus 5.6 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7900X3D — a 3.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 7900X3D (base: 3.4 GHz vs 4.4 GHz). The EPYC 4465P uses the Grado (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen 9 7900X3D uses Raphael (2023−2025) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4465P scores 50,216 against the Ryzen 9 7900X3D's 50,213 — a 0% lead for the EPYC 4465P. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 4465P vs 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 7900X3D.
| Feature | EPYC 4465P | Ryzen 9 7900X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24 | 12 / 24 |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz | 5.6 GHz+4% |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz | 4.4 GHz+29% |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB (total) | 128 MB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-20% | 5 nm, 6 nm |
| Architecture | Grado (2025) | Raphael (2023−2025) |
| PassMark | 50,216 | 50,213 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the AM5 socket with PCIe 4.0. Both support up to 5200 memory speed. Both support up to 128 of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 28 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: AM5 (EPYC 4465P) and AM5 (Ryzen 9 7900X3D).
| Feature | EPYC 4465P | Ryzen 9 7900X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | 5200 | 5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 | 128 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 28 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — AMD Radeon Graphics (EPYC 4465P) and AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 9 7900X3D) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: EPYC 4465P rivals Core i7-14700K; Ryzen 9 7900X3D rivals Core i7-14700K.
| Feature | EPYC 4465P | Ryzen 9 7900X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon Graphics | AMD Radeon Graphics |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 4465P launched at $399 MSRP, while the Ryzen 9 7900X3D debuted at $599. On MSRP ($399 vs $599), the EPYC 4465P is $200 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4465P delivers 125.9 pts/$ vs 83.8 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 7900X3D — making the EPYC 4465P the 40.1% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 4465P | Ryzen 9 7900X3D |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399-33% | $599 |
| Performance per Dollar | 125.9+50% | 83.8 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












