
Core i5-13600K
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 7900
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-13600K
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (37,655 vs 48,168).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 9 7900.
Ryzen 9 7900
2023Why buy it
- ✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 24 MB).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i5-13600K.
Trade-offs
- ❌30.4% HIGHER MSRP$429 MSRPvs$329 MSRP
Core i5-13600K
2022Ryzen 9 7900
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 24 MB).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i5-13600K.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (37,655 vs 48,168).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 9 7900.
Trade-offs
- ❌30.4% HIGHER MSRP$429 MSRPvs$329 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 7900 better than Core i5-13600K?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 9 7900 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 281 FPS | 288 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 259 FPS |
| high | 220 FPS | 218 FPS |
| ultra | 188 FPS | 190 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 235 FPS | 270 FPS |
| medium | 198 FPS | 218 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 170 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 152 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 151 FPS |
| high | 102 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 101 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 9 7900 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 632 FPS | 706 FPS |
| medium | 533 FPS | 599 FPS |
| high | 450 FPS | 450 FPS |
| ultra | 416 FPS | 389 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 540 FPS | 593 FPS |
| medium | 474 FPS | 522 FPS |
| high | 403 FPS | 406 FPS |
| ultra | 351 FPS | 322 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 316 FPS | 335 FPS |
| medium | 282 FPS | 298 FPS |
| high | 269 FPS | 264 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 226 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 9 7900 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 663 FPS | 876 FPS |
| medium | 543 FPS | 699 FPS |
| high | 477 FPS | 608 FPS |
| ultra | 414 FPS | 518 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 702 FPS |
| medium | 499 FPS | 562 FPS |
| high | 434 FPS | 481 FPS |
| ultra | 376 FPS | 408 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 441 FPS | 499 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 414 FPS |
| high | 344 FPS | 372 FPS |
| ultra | 295 FPS | 312 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 9 7900 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 941 FPS | 1125 FPS |
| medium | 941 FPS | 987 FPS |
| high | 923 FPS | 860 FPS |
| ultra | 831 FPS | 765 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 941 FPS | 892 FPS |
| medium | 850 FPS | 774 FPS |
| high | 738 FPS | 677 FPS |
| ultra | 651 FPS | 580 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 651 FPS | 644 FPS |
| medium | 588 FPS | 570 FPS |
| high | 529 FPS | 503 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 434 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13600K and Ryzen 9 7900

Core i5-13600K
Core i5-13600K
The Core i5-13600K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 37,655 points. Launch price was $319.


Ryzen 9 7900
Ryzen 9 7900
The Ryzen 9 7900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 48,168 points. Launch price was $429.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13600K packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 9 7900 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Core i5-13600K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i5-13600K versus 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7900 — a 5.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 7900 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Core i5-13600K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 9 7900 uses Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13600K scores 37,655 against the Ryzen 9 7900's 48,168 — a 24.5% lead for the Ryzen 9 7900. L3 cache: 24 MB on the Core i5-13600K vs 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 7900.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 9 7900 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20+17% | 12 / 24 |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz | 5.4 GHz+6% |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz | 3.7 GHz+6% |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB | 64 MB (total)+167% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 5 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 37,655 | 48,168+28% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 24,600 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,800 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 18,000 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13600K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 9 7900 uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5600 memory speed. The Core i5-13600K supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13600K) vs 28 (Ryzen 9 7900) — the Ryzen 9 7900 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel 600 series,Intel 700 series (Core i5-13600K) and AMD X670E,AMD X670,AMD B650E,AMD B650,AMD A620 (Ryzen 9 7900).
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 9 7900 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | DDR5-5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+50% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 28+40% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Ryzen 9 7900 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13600K) vs true (Ryzen 9 7900). Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 770 (Core i5-13600K) and Radeon Graphics (Raphael) (Ryzen 9 7900) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13600K targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 7900 rivals Core i9-13900.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 9 7900 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 770 | Radeon Graphics (Raphael) |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | true |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-13600K launched at $329 MSRP, while the Ryzen 9 7900 debuted at $429. On MSRP ($329 vs $429), the Core i5-13600K is $100 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13600K delivers 114.5 pts/$ vs 112.3 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 7900 — making the Core i5-13600K the 1.9% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 9 7900 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-23% | $429 |
| Performance per Dollar | 114.5+2% | 112.3 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












