PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 9 6900HS

2022

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 180W, a 145W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of SP3r2 and DDR4.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 680M, while Ryzen Threadripper 1920X needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (23,040 vs 23,150).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $799 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 6900HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌414.3% higher power demand at 180W vs 35W.
❌Older platform position on SP3r2 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 6900HS moves to FP7 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 6900HS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Ryzen 9 6900HS

2022

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 180W, a 145W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of SP3r2 and DDR4.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 680M, while Ryzen Threadripper 1920X needs a discrete GPU.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (23,040 vs 23,150).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $799 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 6900HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌414.3% higher power demand at 180W vs 35W.
❌Older platform position on SP3r2 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 6900HS moves to FP7 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 6900HS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Threadripper 1920X better than Ryzen 9 6900HS?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Ryzen Threadripper 1920X makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 9 6900HS is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 5.5% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is the better fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is the smarter buy today. Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is at an unclear MSRP at $799 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 5.5% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (29.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 9 6900HS is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2017) and a healthier platform with FP7 and DDR5 instead of SP3r2. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 9 6900HS Benchmark Check

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 9 6900HS	Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
1080p
low	251 FPS	192 FPS
medium	234 FPS	168 FPS
high	197 FPS	138 FPS
ultra	169 FPS	111 FPS
1440p
low	220 FPS	154 FPS
medium	186 FPS	128 FPS
high	152 FPS	102 FPS
ultra	133 FPS	81 FPS
4K
low	154 FPS	68 FPS
medium	131 FPS	60 FPS
high	101 FPS	47 FPS
ultra	89 FPS	38 FPS

Open Ryzen 9 6900HS Open Ryzen Threadripper 1920X

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 9 6900HS	Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
1080p
low	441 FPS	463 FPS
medium	370 FPS	414 FPS
high	322 FPS	358 FPS
ultra	287 FPS	319 FPS
1440p
low	370 FPS	404 FPS
medium	323 FPS	365 FPS
high	288 FPS	317 FPS
ultra	247 FPS	274 FPS
4K
low	255 FPS	260 FPS
medium	229 FPS	233 FPS
high	215 FPS	218 FPS
ultra	186 FPS	190 FPS

Open Ryzen 9 6900HS Open Ryzen Threadripper 1920X

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 9 6900HS	Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
1080p
low	576 FPS	579 FPS
medium	564 FPS	579 FPS
high	485 FPS	556 FPS
ultra	388 FPS	489 FPS
1440p
low	576 FPS	579 FPS
medium	510 FPS	516 FPS
high	437 FPS	453 FPS
ultra	355 FPS	395 FPS
4K
low	432 FPS	455 FPS
medium	368 FPS	365 FPS
high	323 FPS	327 FPS
ultra	262 FPS	271 FPS

Open Ryzen 9 6900HS Open Ryzen Threadripper 1920X

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 9 6900HS	Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
1080p
low	576 FPS	579 FPS
medium	576 FPS	579 FPS
high	576 FPS	579 FPS
ultra	576 FPS	579 FPS
1440p
low	576 FPS	579 FPS
medium	576 FPS	579 FPS
high	576 FPS	527 FPS
ultra	513 FPS	453 FPS
4K
low	536 FPS	475 FPS
medium	489 FPS	436 FPS
high	438 FPS	392 FPS
ultra	379 FPS	338 FPS

Open Ryzen 9 6900HS Open Ryzen Threadripper 1920X

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 6900HS and Ryzen Threadripper 1920X

Ryzen 9 6900HS

The Ryzen 9 6900HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 23,040 points. Launch price was $299.

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X

The Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 23,150 points. Launch price was $799.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 9 6900HS packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 9 6900HS versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X — a 15.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 6900HS (base: 3.3 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Ryzen 9 6900HS uses the Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022) architecture (6 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 6900HS scores 23,040 against the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X's 23,150 — a 0.5% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 6900HS vs 32 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.

Feature	Ryzen 9 6900HS	Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	12 / 24+50%
Boost Clock	4.9 GHz+17%	4.2 GHz
Base Clock	3.3 GHz	3.5 GHz+6%
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)	32 MB+100%
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	512K (per core)
Process	6 nm-57%	14 nm
Architecture	Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022)	Zen (2017−2020)
PassMark	23,040	23,150
Cinebench R23 Multi	13,445	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,854	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	8,732	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 9 6900HS uses the FP7 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X uses SP3r2 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Ryzen 9 6900HS	Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Socket	FP7	SP3r2
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	20	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 9 6900HS) / not specified (Ryzen Threadripper 1920X). The Ryzen 9 6900HS includes integrated graphics (Radeon 680M), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X requires a dedicated GPU.