
Ryzen 9 6900HS
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 9 6900HS
2022Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 120W, a 85W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7950X3D across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (13,445 vs 38,581).
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +27.0% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $699 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 6900HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌242.9% higher power demand at 120W vs 35W.
Ryzen 9 6900HS
2022Ryzen 9 7950X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 120W, a 85W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +27.0% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7950X3D across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (13,445 vs 38,581).
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $699 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 6900HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌242.9% higher power demand at 120W vs 35W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 7950X3D better than Ryzen 9 6900HS?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 6900HS | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 251 FPS | 291 FPS |
| medium | 234 FPS | 265 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 219 FPS |
| ultra | 169 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 220 FPS | 275 FPS |
| medium | 186 FPS | 227 FPS |
| high | 152 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 133 FPS | 156 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 154 FPS | 190 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 156 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 107 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 6900HS | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 441 FPS | 734 FPS |
| medium | 370 FPS | 627 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 465 FPS |
| ultra | 287 FPS | 393 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 370 FPS | 602 FPS |
| medium | 323 FPS | 536 FPS |
| high | 288 FPS | 413 FPS |
| ultra | 247 FPS | 326 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 255 FPS | 338 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 305 FPS |
| high | 215 FPS | 268 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 229 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 9 6900HS | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 576 FPS | 1025 FPS |
| medium | 564 FPS | 1122 FPS |
| high | 485 FPS | 1062 FPS |
| ultra | 388 FPS | 875 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 576 FPS | 936 FPS |
| medium | 510 FPS | 845 FPS |
| high | 437 FPS | 775 FPS |
| ultra | 355 FPS | 656 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 432 FPS | 574 FPS |
| medium | 368 FPS | 498 FPS |
| high | 323 FPS | 447 FPS |
| ultra | 262 FPS | 378 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 9 6900HS | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 576 FPS | 1082 FPS |
| medium | 576 FPS | 973 FPS |
| high | 576 FPS | 854 FPS |
| ultra | 576 FPS | 766 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 576 FPS | 853 FPS |
| medium | 576 FPS | 751 FPS |
| high | 576 FPS | 659 FPS |
| ultra | 513 FPS | 569 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 536 FPS | 623 FPS |
| medium | 489 FPS | 555 FPS |
| high | 438 FPS | 493 FPS |
| ultra | 379 FPS | 426 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 6900HS and Ryzen 9 7950X3D


Ryzen 9 6900HS
Ryzen 9 6900HS
The Ryzen 9 6900HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 23,040 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
The Ryzen 9 7950X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 62,323 points. Launch price was $699.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 9 6900HS packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Ryzen 9 7950X3D has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 9 6900HS versus 5.7 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D — a 15.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D (base: 3.3 GHz vs 4.2 GHz). The Ryzen 9 6900HS uses the Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022) architecture (6 nm), while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D uses Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 6900HS scores 23,040 against the Ryzen 9 7950X3D's 62,323 — a 92% lead for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 13,445 vs 38,581 (96.6% advantage for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,854 vs 2,926, a 44.9% lead for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 8,732 vs 19,643 (76.9% advantage for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D). L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 6900HS vs 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 6900HS | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 16 / 32+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz | 5.7 GHz+16% |
| Base Clock | 3.3 GHz | 4.2 GHz+27% |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 128 MB (total)+700% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 6 nm | 5 nm, 6 nm-17% |
| Architecture | Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022) | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 23,040 | 62,323+170% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 13,445 | 38,581+187% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,854 | 2,926+58% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 8,732 | 19,643+125% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 9 6900HS uses the FP7 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800 memory speed. The Ryzen 9 7950X3D supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Ryzen 9 6900HS) vs 28 (Ryzen 9 7950X3D) — the Ryzen 9 7950X3D offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FP7 (Ryzen 9 6900HS) and AMD X670E,AMD X670,AMD B650E,AMD B650 (Ryzen 9 7950X3D).
| Feature | Ryzen 9 6900HS | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP7 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | DDR5-5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 128 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 28+40% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Ryzen 9 7950X3D supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 9 6900HS) vs true (Ryzen 9 7950X3D). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon 680M (Ryzen 9 6900HS) and Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 9 7950X3D) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 7950X3D rivals Core i9-13900K.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 6900HS | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Radeon 680M | Radeon Graphics |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | true |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












