
Ryzen 7 7735HS
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 6900HS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 7735HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅+2.5% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Ryzen 9 6900HS
2022Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,854 vs 1,900).
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (13,445 vs 13,500).
Ryzen 7 7735HS
2023Ryzen 9 6900HS
2022Why buy it
- ✅+2.5% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,854 vs 1,900).
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (13,445 vs 13,500).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 7735HS better than Ryzen 9 6900HS?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 7735HS | Ryzen 9 6900HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 246 FPS | 251 FPS |
| medium | 230 FPS | 234 FPS |
| high | 192 FPS | 197 FPS |
| ultra | 165 FPS | 169 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 217 FPS | 220 FPS |
| medium | 184 FPS | 186 FPS |
| high | 149 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 133 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 129 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 89 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 7735HS | Ryzen 9 6900HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 464 FPS | 441 FPS |
| medium | 392 FPS | 370 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 322 FPS |
| ultra | 296 FPS | 287 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 397 FPS | 370 FPS |
| medium | 347 FPS | 323 FPS |
| high | 306 FPS | 288 FPS |
| ultra | 258 FPS | 247 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 274 FPS | 255 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 229 FPS |
| high | 229 FPS | 215 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 186 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 7735HS | Ryzen 9 6900HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 572 FPS | 576 FPS |
| medium | 572 FPS | 564 FPS |
| high | 494 FPS | 485 FPS |
| ultra | 403 FPS | 388 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 572 FPS | 576 FPS |
| medium | 520 FPS | 510 FPS |
| high | 443 FPS | 437 FPS |
| ultra | 365 FPS | 355 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 452 FPS | 432 FPS |
| medium | 380 FPS | 368 FPS |
| high | 333 FPS | 323 FPS |
| ultra | 272 FPS | 262 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 7735HS | Ryzen 9 6900HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 572 FPS | 576 FPS |
| medium | 572 FPS | 576 FPS |
| high | 572 FPS | 576 FPS |
| ultra | 572 FPS | 576 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 572 FPS | 576 FPS |
| medium | 572 FPS | 576 FPS |
| high | 572 FPS | 576 FPS |
| ultra | 510 FPS | 513 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 533 FPS | 536 FPS |
| medium | 487 FPS | 489 FPS |
| high | 434 FPS | 438 FPS |
| ultra | 376 FPS | 379 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 7735HS and Ryzen 9 6900HS


Ryzen 7 7735HS
Ryzen 7 7735HS
The Ryzen 7 7735HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 April 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-HS Refresh (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.75 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 22,897 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 9 6900HS
Ryzen 9 6900HS
The Ryzen 9 6900HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 23,040 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 7 7735HS and Ryzen 9 6900HS share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.75 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7735HS versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 9 6900HS — a 3.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 6900HS (base: 3.2 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Ryzen 7 7735HS uses the Rembrandt-HS Refresh (2023) architecture (6 nm), while the Ryzen 9 6900HS uses Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 7735HS scores 22,897 against the Ryzen 9 6900HS's 23,040 — a 0.6% lead for the Ryzen 9 6900HS. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 13,500 vs 13,445 (0.4% advantage for the Ryzen 7 7735HS). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,900 vs 1,854, a 2.5% lead for the Ryzen 7 7735HS that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 8,800 vs 8,732 (0.8% advantage for the Ryzen 7 7735HS). Both processors carry 16 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 7735HS | Ryzen 9 6900HS |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.75 GHz | 4.9 GHz+3% |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz | 3.3 GHz+3% |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| Architecture | Rembrandt-HS Refresh (2023) | Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022) |
| PassMark | 22,897 | 23,040 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 13,500 | 13,445 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,900+2% | 1,854 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 8,800 | 8,732 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the FP7 socket with PCIe 4.0. Both support up to LPDDR5-6400 memory speed. Both support up to 64 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SoC (Ryzen 7 7735HS) and FP7 (Ryzen 9 6900HS).
| Feature | Ryzen 7 7735HS | Ryzen 9 6900HS |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP7 | FP7 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR5-6400 | DDR5-4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 6900HS has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AMD-V virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — Radeon 680M (Ryzen 7 7735HS) and Radeon 680M (Ryzen 9 6900HS) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 7735HS targets High Performance Laptop.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 7735HS | Ryzen 9 6900HS |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Radeon 680M | Radeon 680M |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | AMD-V |
| Target Use | High Performance Laptop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











