
Ryzen 7 7435HS
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 6900HS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 7435HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 6900HS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌28.6% higher power demand at 45W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 6900HS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 9 6900HS
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +15.4% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 45W, a 10W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 680M, while Ryzen 7 7435HS needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (23,040 vs 23,101).
Ryzen 7 7435HS
2023Ryzen 9 6900HS
2022Why buy it
- ✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +15.4% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 45W, a 10W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 680M, while Ryzen 7 7435HS needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 6900HS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌28.6% higher power demand at 45W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 6900HS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (23,040 vs 23,101).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 7435HS better than Ryzen 9 6900HS?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 7435HS | Ryzen 9 6900HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 166 FPS | 251 FPS |
| medium | 145 FPS | 234 FPS |
| high | 116 FPS | 197 FPS |
| ultra | 98 FPS | 169 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 220 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 186 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 133 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 89 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 7435HS | Ryzen 9 6900HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 464 FPS | 441 FPS |
| medium | 391 FPS | 370 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 322 FPS |
| ultra | 297 FPS | 287 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 397 FPS | 370 FPS |
| medium | 346 FPS | 323 FPS |
| high | 306 FPS | 288 FPS |
| ultra | 259 FPS | 247 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 274 FPS | 255 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 229 FPS |
| high | 229 FPS | 215 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 186 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 7435HS | Ryzen 9 6900HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 578 FPS | 576 FPS |
| medium | 495 FPS | 564 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 485 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 388 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 524 FPS | 576 FPS |
| medium | 440 FPS | 510 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 437 FPS |
| ultra | 333 FPS | 355 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 394 FPS | 432 FPS |
| medium | 325 FPS | 368 FPS |
| high | 285 FPS | 323 FPS |
| ultra | 230 FPS | 262 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 7435HS | Ryzen 9 6900HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 578 FPS | 576 FPS |
| medium | 578 FPS | 576 FPS |
| high | 578 FPS | 576 FPS |
| ultra | 578 FPS | 576 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 578 FPS | 576 FPS |
| medium | 578 FPS | 576 FPS |
| high | 568 FPS | 576 FPS |
| ultra | 495 FPS | 513 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 510 FPS | 536 FPS |
| medium | 469 FPS | 489 FPS |
| high | 419 FPS | 438 FPS |
| ultra | 364 FPS | 379 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 7435HS and Ryzen 9 6900HS


Ryzen 7 7435HS
Ryzen 7 7435HS
The Ryzen 7 7435HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt R (2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 23,101 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 9 6900HS
Ryzen 9 6900HS
The Ryzen 9 6900HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 23,040 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 7 7435HS and Ryzen 9 6900HS share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7435HS versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 9 6900HS — a 8.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 6900HS (base: 3.1 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Ryzen 7 7435HS uses the Rembrandt R (2025) architecture (6 nm), while the Ryzen 9 6900HS uses Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 7435HS scores 23,101 against the Ryzen 9 6900HS's 23,040 — a 0.3% lead for the Ryzen 7 7435HS. L3 cache: 16 MB on the Ryzen 7 7435HS vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 6900HS.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 7435HS | Ryzen 9 6900HS |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz | 4.9 GHz+9% |
| Base Clock | 3.1 GHz | 3.3 GHz+6% |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+700% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| Architecture | Rembrandt R (2025) | Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022) |
| PassMark | 23,101 | 23,040 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 13,445 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,854 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 8,732 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 7435HS uses the FP7r2 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 9 6900HS uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 7435HS | Ryzen 9 6900HS |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP7r2 | FP7 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR5-4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | No |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 20 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 7 7435HS) / AMD-V (Ryzen 9 6900HS). The Ryzen 9 6900HS includes integrated graphics (Radeon 680M), while the Ryzen 7 7435HS requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 7435HS | Ryzen 9 6900HS |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon 680M |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












