
Ryzen 7 7435HS
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 7840S
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 7435HS
2023Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7840S across 36 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (23,101 vs 23,290).
- ❌462.5% higher power demand at 45W vs 8W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 7840S can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 7 7840S
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +28.2% higher average FPS across 36 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 8W instead of 45W, a 37W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 780M, while Ryzen 7 7435HS needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Ryzen 7 7435HS
2023Ryzen 7 7840S
2023Why buy it
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +28.2% higher average FPS across 36 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 8W instead of 45W, a 37W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 780M, while Ryzen 7 7435HS needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7840S across 36 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (23,101 vs 23,290).
- ❌462.5% higher power demand at 45W vs 8W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 7840S can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 7840S better than Ryzen 7 7435HS?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 7435HS | Ryzen 7 7840S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 166 FPS | 269 FPS |
| medium | 145 FPS | 243 FPS |
| high | 116 FPS | 204 FPS |
| ultra | 98 FPS | 176 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 236 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 139 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 92 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 7435HS | Ryzen 7 7840S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 464 FPS | 510 FPS |
| medium | 391 FPS | 419 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 361 FPS |
| ultra | 297 FPS | 322 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 397 FPS | 446 FPS |
| medium | 346 FPS | 386 FPS |
| high | 306 FPS | 332 FPS |
| ultra | 259 FPS | 283 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 274 FPS | 294 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 266 FPS |
| high | 229 FPS | 251 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 216 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 7435HS | Ryzen 7 7840S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 578 FPS | 582 FPS |
| medium | 495 FPS | 582 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 582 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 546 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 524 FPS | 582 FPS |
| medium | 440 FPS | 582 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 541 FPS |
| ultra | 333 FPS | 464 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 394 FPS | 541 FPS |
| medium | 325 FPS | 473 FPS |
| high | 285 FPS | 419 FPS |
| ultra | 230 FPS | 355 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 7435HS | Ryzen 7 7840S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 578 FPS | 582 FPS |
| medium | 578 FPS | 582 FPS |
| high | 578 FPS | 582 FPS |
| ultra | 578 FPS | 582 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 578 FPS | 582 FPS |
| medium | 578 FPS | 582 FPS |
| high | 568 FPS | 582 FPS |
| ultra | 495 FPS | 573 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 510 FPS | 572 FPS |
| medium | 469 FPS | 511 FPS |
| high | 419 FPS | 457 FPS |
| ultra | 364 FPS | 394 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 7435HS and Ryzen 7 7840S


Ryzen 7 7435HS
Ryzen 7 7435HS
The Ryzen 7 7435HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt R (2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 23,101 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 7 7840S
Ryzen 7 7840S
The Ryzen 7 7840S is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP7r2/FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 8 MB + 16 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 23,290 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 7 7435HS and Ryzen 7 7840S share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7435HS versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7840S — a 12.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 7840S (base: 3.1 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Ryzen 7 7435HS uses the Rembrandt R (2025) architecture (6 nm), while the Ryzen 7 7840S uses Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 7435HS scores 23,101 against the Ryzen 7 7840S's 23,290 — a 0.8% lead for the Ryzen 7 7840S. Both processors carry 16 MB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 7435HS | Ryzen 7 7840S |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz | 5.1 GHz+13% |
| Base Clock | 3.1 GHz | 3.8 GHz+23% |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 16 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 8 MB+100% |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm-33% |
| Architecture | Rembrandt R (2025) | Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) |
| PassMark | 23,101 | 23,290 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 13,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,570 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 13,535 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 7435HS uses the FP7r2 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 7840S uses FP7/FP7r2/FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 7435HS | Ryzen 7 7840S |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP7r2 | FP7/FP7r2/FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR5-5600, LPDDR5x-7500 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 256 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 20 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 7 7435HS) / AMD-V (SVM) (Ryzen 7 7840S). The Ryzen 7 7840S includes integrated graphics (Radeon 780M), while the Ryzen 7 7435HS requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 7840S targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 7840S rivals Core i7-1360P.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 7435HS | Ryzen 7 7840S |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon 780M |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V (SVM) |
| Target Use | — | Gaming |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












