
Core i9-7920X
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 5980HX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i9-7920X
2017Why buy it
- ✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5980HX across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $1,199 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 5980HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌211.1% higher power demand at 140W vs 45W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 5980HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 9 5980HX
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +15.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 140W, a 95W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics (8CU), while Core i9-7920X needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (23,300 vs 23,508).
Core i9-7920X
2017Ryzen 9 5980HX
2021Why buy it
- ✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +15.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 140W, a 95W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics (8CU), while Core i9-7920X needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5980HX across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $1,199 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 5980HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌211.1% higher power demand at 140W vs 45W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 5980HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (23,300 vs 23,508).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 5980HX better than Core i9-7920X?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i9-7920X | Ryzen 9 5980HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 260 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 201 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 170 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 140 FPS | 231 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 192 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 156 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 136 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 76 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 70 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 91 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i9-7920X | Ryzen 9 5980HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 352 FPS | 427 FPS |
| medium | 300 FPS | 356 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 308 FPS |
| ultra | 243 FPS | 273 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 315 FPS | 357 FPS |
| medium | 274 FPS | 312 FPS |
| high | 249 FPS | 276 FPS |
| ultra | 215 FPS | 236 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 227 FPS | 245 FPS |
| medium | 201 FPS | 220 FPS |
| high | 191 FPS | 207 FPS |
| ultra | 162 FPS | 180 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i9-7920X | Ryzen 9 5980HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 560 FPS | 582 FPS |
| medium | 468 FPS | 582 FPS |
| high | 420 FPS | 576 FPS |
| ultra | 366 FPS | 472 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 507 FPS | 582 FPS |
| medium | 431 FPS | 532 FPS |
| high | 385 FPS | 451 FPS |
| ultra | 334 FPS | 372 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 390 FPS | 456 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 396 FPS |
| high | 284 FPS | 347 FPS |
| ultra | 231 FPS | 282 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i9-7920X | Ryzen 9 5980HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 588 FPS | 582 FPS |
| medium | 588 FPS | 582 FPS |
| high | 588 FPS | 582 FPS |
| ultra | 588 FPS | 582 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 588 FPS | 582 FPS |
| medium | 588 FPS | 582 FPS |
| high | 579 FPS | 554 FPS |
| ultra | 502 FPS | 475 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 531 FPS | 511 FPS |
| medium | 480 FPS | 460 FPS |
| high | 424 FPS | 405 FPS |
| ultra | 366 FPS | 348 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-7920X and Ryzen 9 5980HX

Core i9-7920X
Core i9-7920X
The Core i9-7920X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 September 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 16.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 23,508 points. Launch price was $1,199.


Ryzen 9 5980HX
Ryzen 9 5980HX
The Ryzen 9 5980HX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 12 January 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Cezanne-HX (Zen 3) (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 23,300 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i9-7920X packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Ryzen 9 5980HX offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i9-7920X has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i9-7920X versus 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5980HX — a 8.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 5980HX (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i9-7920X uses the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 9 5980HX uses Cezanne-HX (Zen 3) (2021) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-7920X scores 23,508 against the Ryzen 9 5980HX's 23,300 — a 0.9% lead for the Core i9-7920X. L3 cache: 16.5 MB (total) on the Core i9-7920X vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 5980HX.
| Feature | Core i9-7920X | Ryzen 9 5980HX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24+50% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 4.8 GHz+9% |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz | 3.3 GHz+14% |
| L3 Cache | 16.5 MB (total)+3% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 7 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) | Cezanne-HX (Zen 3) (2021) |
| PassMark | 23,508 | 23,300 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-7920X uses the LGA2066 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 9 5980HX uses FP6 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i9-7920X | Ryzen 9 5980HX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2066 | FP6 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | LPDDR4-4266 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | No |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core i9-7920X) / AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5980HX). The Ryzen 9 5980HX includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics (8CU)), while the Core i9-7920X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 9 5980HX targets Mobile High-End.
| Feature | Core i9-7920X | Ryzen 9 5980HX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon Graphics (8CU) |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Mobile High-End |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











