
Ryzen 9 5900
Popular choices:

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 9 5900
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +22.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+300% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅50% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (33,912 vs 34,585).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $549 MSRP, while Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 moves to FP8 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
2024Why buy it
- ✅+2% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 890M, while Ryzen 9 5900 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 64 MB).
Ryzen 9 5900
2021Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +22.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+300% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅50% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅+2% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 890M, while Ryzen 9 5900 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (33,912 vs 34,585).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $549 MSRP, while Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 moves to FP8 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 64 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 better than Ryzen 9 5900?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900 | Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 164 FPS | 245 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 230 FPS |
| high | 117 FPS | 192 FPS |
| ultra | 98 FPS | 165 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 216 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 184 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 148 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 130 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 128 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 47 FPS | 86 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900 | Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 734 FPS | 262 FPS |
| medium | 625 FPS | 220 FPS |
| high | 495 FPS | 194 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 608 FPS | 232 FPS |
| medium | 529 FPS | 203 FPS |
| high | 440 FPS | 178 FPS |
| ultra | 361 FPS | 151 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 314 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 253 FPS | 115 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900 | Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 805 FPS | 738 FPS |
| medium | 627 FPS | 587 FPS |
| high | 543 FPS | 508 FPS |
| ultra | 449 FPS | 429 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 690 FPS | 661 FPS |
| medium | 543 FPS | 533 FPS |
| high | 469 FPS | 455 FPS |
| ultra | 393 FPS | 388 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 490 FPS | 482 FPS |
| medium | 404 FPS | 403 FPS |
| high | 359 FPS | 359 FPS |
| ultra | 296 FPS | 301 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900 | Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 848 FPS | 865 FPS |
| medium | 848 FPS | 809 FPS |
| high | 836 FPS | 694 FPS |
| ultra | 744 FPS | 625 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 848 FPS | 757 FPS |
| medium | 760 FPS | 680 FPS |
| high | 665 FPS | 583 FPS |
| ultra | 570 FPS | 515 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 626 FPS | 518 FPS |
| medium | 559 FPS | 473 FPS |
| high | 494 FPS | 420 FPS |
| ultra | 426 FPS | 369 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 5900 and Ryzen AI 9 HX 375


Ryzen 9 5900
Ryzen 9 5900
The Ryzen 9 5900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 12 January 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 33,912 points. Launch price was $499.


Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
The Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Julho 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Strix Point-HX (Zen 5) (2024) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 34,585 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 9 5900 and Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 share an identical 12-core/24-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5900 versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 — a 8.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 (base: 3 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Ryzen 9 5900 uses the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 uses Strix Point-HX (Zen 5) (2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 5900 scores 33,912 against the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375's 34,585 — a 2% lead for the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375. L3 cache: 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 5900 vs 16 MB on the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900 | Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24 | 12 / 24 |
| Boost Clock | 4.7 GHz | 5.1 GHz+9% |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz+50% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB+300% | 16 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Vermeer (2020−2025) | Strix Point-HX (Zen 5) (2024) |
| PassMark | 33,912 | 34,585+2% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 22,246 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,865 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 15,100 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 9 5900 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 9 5900 versus LPDDR5x-8000, DDR5-5600 on the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 — the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 9 5900) vs 16 (Ryzen AI 9 HX 375) — the Ryzen 9 5900 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900 | Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | LPDDR5x-8000, DDR5-5600+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 256 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 24+50% | 16 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 5900 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5900) vs AMD-V, AMD-Vi (Ryzen AI 9 HX 375). The Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 includes integrated graphics (Radeon 890M), while the Ryzen 9 5900 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 9 5900 targets OEM Gaming, Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 targets AI-Notebook. Direct competitor: Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 rivals Ryzen AI 9 HX 370.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900 | Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon 890M |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | AMD-V, AMD-Vi |
| Target Use | OEM Gaming | AI-Notebook |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 9 5900 launched at $549 MSRP, while the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 debuted at $0. On MSRP ($549 vs $0), the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 is $549 cheaper.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900 | Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $549 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 61.8 | — |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












