
Ryzen 7 5800X
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 3950X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 5800X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $300 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $749 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 20.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 61.7 vs 51.4 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $749 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 3950X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (27,712 vs 38,519).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
Ryzen 9 3950X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 51.4 vs 61.7 PassMark/$ ($749 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
Ryzen 7 5800X
2020Ryzen 9 3950X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $300 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $749 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 20.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 61.7 vs 51.4 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $749 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 3950X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (27,712 vs 38,519).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 51.4 vs 61.7 PassMark/$ ($749 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 3950X better than Ryzen 7 5800X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5800X | Ryzen 9 3950X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 206 FPS | 207 FPS |
| medium | 178 FPS | 182 FPS |
| high | 146 FPS | 147 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 119 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 167 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 138 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 83 FPS | 89 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 50 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5800X | Ryzen 9 3950X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 662 FPS | 701 FPS |
| medium | 558 FPS | 616 FPS |
| high | 466 FPS | 497 FPS |
| ultra | 417 FPS | 438 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 563 FPS | 580 FPS |
| medium | 493 FPS | 519 FPS |
| high | 423 FPS | 439 FPS |
| ultra | 361 FPS | 360 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 350 FPS | 340 FPS |
| medium | 308 FPS | 306 FPS |
| high | 288 FPS | 283 FPS |
| ultra | 250 FPS | 252 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5800X | Ryzen 9 3950X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 693 FPS | 871 FPS |
| medium | 651 FPS | 701 FPS |
| high | 570 FPS | 623 FPS |
| ultra | 464 FPS | 520 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 693 FPS | 710 FPS |
| medium | 573 FPS | 572 FPS |
| high | 498 FPS | 498 FPS |
| ultra | 413 FPS | 422 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 494 FPS |
| medium | 410 FPS | 412 FPS |
| high | 363 FPS | 365 FPS |
| ultra | 302 FPS | 307 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5800X | Ryzen 9 3950X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 693 FPS | 963 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 963 FPS |
| high | 693 FPS | 887 FPS |
| ultra | 693 FPS | 796 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 693 FPS | 883 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 772 FPS |
| high | 672 FPS | 678 FPS |
| ultra | 593 FPS | 597 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 604 FPS | 649 FPS |
| medium | 550 FPS | 577 FPS |
| high | 495 FPS | 513 FPS |
| ultra | 436 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 5800X and Ryzen 9 3950X


Ryzen 7 5800X
Ryzen 7 5800X
The Ryzen 7 5800X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 27,712 points. Launch price was $449.


Ryzen 9 3950X
Ryzen 9 3950X
The Ryzen 9 3950X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 November 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 38,519 points. Launch price was $799.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 5800X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 9 3950X offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Ryzen 9 3950X has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5800X versus 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 9 3950X — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.8 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Ryzen 7 5800X uses the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Ryzen 9 3950X uses Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 5800X scores 27,712 against the Ryzen 9 3950X's 38,519 — a 32.6% lead for the Ryzen 9 3950X. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 5800X vs 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 3950X.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5800X | Ryzen 9 3950X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 16 / 32+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.7 GHz | 4.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz+9% | 3.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB | 64 MB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 27,712 | 38,519+39% |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the AM4 socket with PCIe 4.0. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 24 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 5800X) and X570,B550 (Ryzen 9 3950X).
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5800X | Ryzen 9 3950X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 24 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support AMD-V virtualization. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5800X targets Desktop.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5800X | Ryzen 9 3950X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 5800X launched at $449 MSRP, while the Ryzen 9 3950X debuted at $749. On MSRP ($449 vs $749), the Ryzen 7 5800X is $300 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 5800X delivers 61.7 pts/$ vs 51.4 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 3950X — making the Ryzen 7 5800X the 18.2% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5800X | Ryzen 9 3950X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $449-40% | $749 |
| Performance per Dollar | 61.7+20% | 51.4 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2019 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












