
Ryzen 7 5800X
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 3900X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 5800X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 3900X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (27,712 vs 32,517).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 9 3900X.
Ryzen 9 3900X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +21.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Wraith Prism), unlike Ryzen 7 5800X.
Trade-offs
- ❌11.1% HIGHER MSRP$499 MSRPvs$449 MSRP
Ryzen 7 5800X
2020Ryzen 9 3900X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +21.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Wraith Prism), unlike Ryzen 7 5800X.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 3900X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (27,712 vs 32,517).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 9 3900X.
Trade-offs
- ❌11.1% HIGHER MSRP$499 MSRPvs$449 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 3900X better than Ryzen 7 5800X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5800X | Ryzen 9 3900X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 206 FPS | 209 FPS |
| medium | 178 FPS | 170 FPS |
| high | 146 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 114 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 83 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 77 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 49 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5800X | Ryzen 9 3900X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 662 FPS | 781 FPS |
| medium | 558 FPS | 654 FPS |
| high | 466 FPS | 510 FPS |
| ultra | 417 FPS | 447 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 563 FPS | 648 FPS |
| medium | 493 FPS | 552 FPS |
| high | 423 FPS | 452 FPS |
| ultra | 361 FPS | 369 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 350 FPS | 380 FPS |
| medium | 308 FPS | 326 FPS |
| high | 288 FPS | 293 FPS |
| ultra | 250 FPS | 258 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5800X | Ryzen 9 3900X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 693 FPS | 813 FPS |
| medium | 651 FPS | 794 FPS |
| high | 570 FPS | 730 FPS |
| ultra | 464 FPS | 647 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 693 FPS | 707 FPS |
| medium | 573 FPS | 583 FPS |
| high | 498 FPS | 522 FPS |
| ultra | 413 FPS | 459 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 503 FPS |
| medium | 410 FPS | 403 FPS |
| high | 363 FPS | 361 FPS |
| ultra | 302 FPS | 292 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5800X | Ryzen 9 3900X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 693 FPS | 813 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 813 FPS |
| high | 693 FPS | 813 FPS |
| ultra | 693 FPS | 813 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 693 FPS | 813 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 813 FPS |
| high | 672 FPS | 714 FPS |
| ultra | 593 FPS | 619 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 604 FPS | 669 FPS |
| medium | 550 FPS | 594 FPS |
| high | 495 FPS | 525 FPS |
| ultra | 436 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 5800X and Ryzen 9 3900X


Ryzen 7 5800X
Ryzen 7 5800X
The Ryzen 7 5800X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 27,712 points. Launch price was $449.


Ryzen 9 3900X
Ryzen 9 3900X
The Ryzen 9 3900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 32,517 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 5800X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 9 3900X offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Ryzen 9 3900X has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5800X versus 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 9 3900X — a 2.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 5800X (base: 3.8 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Ryzen 7 5800X uses the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Ryzen 9 3900X uses Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 5800X scores 27,712 against the Ryzen 9 3900X's 32,517 — a 16% lead for the Ryzen 9 3900X. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 5800X vs 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 3900X.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5800X | Ryzen 9 3900X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 12 / 24+50% |
| Boost Clock | 4.7 GHz+2% | 4.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB | 64 MB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 27,712 | 32,517+17% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,300 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 12,000 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the AM4 socket with PCIe 4.0. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 24 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 5800X) and X570,B550 (Ryzen 9 3900X).
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5800X | Ryzen 9 3900X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 24 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support AMD-V virtualization. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5800X targets Desktop, Ryzen 9 3900X targets Workstation.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5800X | Ryzen 9 3900X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Desktop | Workstation |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 5800X launched at $449 MSRP, while the Ryzen 9 3900X debuted at $499. On MSRP ($449 vs $499), the Ryzen 7 5800X is $50 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 5800X delivers 61.7 pts/$ vs 65.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 3900X — making the Ryzen 9 3900X the 5.4% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5800X | Ryzen 9 3900X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $449-10% | $499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 61.7 | 65.2+6% |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2019 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












