
Ryzen 5 5600X
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,845 vs 26,852).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌712.5% higher power demand at 65W vs 8W.
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +37.8% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 8W instead of 65W, a 57W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +37.8% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 8W instead of 65W, a 57W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,845 vs 26,852).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌712.5% higher power demand at 65W vs 8W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS better than Ryzen 5 5600X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600X | Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 203 FPS | 269 FPS |
| medium | 174 FPS | 243 FPS |
| high | 140 FPS | 204 FPS |
| ultra | 107 FPS | 176 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 169 FPS | 236 FPS |
| medium | 141 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 139 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 76 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 47 FPS | 92 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600X | Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 464 FPS | 509 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 419 FPS |
| high | 324 FPS | 361 FPS |
| ultra | 291 FPS | 322 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 397 FPS | 445 FPS |
| medium | 334 FPS | 386 FPS |
| high | 290 FPS | 332 FPS |
| ultra | 253 FPS | 283 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 263 FPS | 293 FPS |
| medium | 226 FPS | 266 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 251 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 216 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600X | Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 546 FPS | 671 FPS |
| medium | 473 FPS | 671 FPS |
| high | 432 FPS | 647 FPS |
| ultra | 358 FPS | 546 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 508 FPS | 671 FPS |
| medium | 413 FPS | 637 FPS |
| high | 375 FPS | 541 FPS |
| ultra | 312 FPS | 464 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 348 FPS | 541 FPS |
| medium | 292 FPS | 473 FPS |
| high | 255 FPS | 419 FPS |
| ultra | 199 FPS | 355 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600X | Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 546 FPS | 671 FPS |
| medium | 546 FPS | 671 FPS |
| high | 546 FPS | 671 FPS |
| ultra | 546 FPS | 671 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 546 FPS | 671 FPS |
| medium | 546 FPS | 671 FPS |
| high | 546 FPS | 660 FPS |
| ultra | 524 FPS | 573 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 529 FPS | 572 FPS |
| medium | 484 FPS | 511 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 457 FPS |
| ultra | 379 FPS | 394 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 5600X and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS


Ryzen 5 5600X
Ryzen 5 5600X
The Ryzen 5 5600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 21,845 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
The Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 8 MB + 16 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 26,852 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 5600X packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600X versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS — a 10.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS (base: 3.7 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Ryzen 5 5600X uses the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS uses Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 5600X scores 21,845 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS's 26,852 — a 20.6% lead for the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 5 5600X vs 16 MB on the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600X | Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz | 5.1 GHz+11% |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz | 3.8 GHz+3% |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB+100% | 16 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 8 MB+1500% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) | Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) |
| PassMark | 21,845 | 26,852+23% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 5600X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS uses FP7/FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600X | Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | FP7/FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5600X) / not specified (Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 5600X targets Desktop.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600X | Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












