
Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U
Popular choices:

Xeon W-3225
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 160W, a 145W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-3225 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (18,191 vs 18,251).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-3225, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.
Xeon W-3225
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 0.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $1,319 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌966.7% higher power demand at 160W vs 15W.
Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U
2023Xeon W-3225
2019Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 160W, a 145W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 0.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-3225 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (18,191 vs 18,251).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-3225, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $1,319 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌966.7% higher power demand at 160W vs 15W.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon W-3225 better than Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U | Xeon W-3225 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 173 FPS | 211 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 166 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 102 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 148 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 125 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 82 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 44 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U | Xeon W-3225 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 236 FPS | 380 FPS |
| medium | 201 FPS | 314 FPS |
| high | 176 FPS | 279 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 247 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 203 FPS | 342 FPS |
| medium | 179 FPS | 292 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 258 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 222 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 140 FPS | 248 FPS |
| medium | 127 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 121 FPS | 201 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 173 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U | Xeon W-3225 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 455 FPS | 456 FPS |
| medium | 455 FPS | 456 FPS |
| high | 455 FPS | 456 FPS |
| ultra | 426 FPS | 456 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 455 FPS | 456 FPS |
| medium | 437 FPS | 456 FPS |
| high | 392 FPS | 456 FPS |
| ultra | 324 FPS | 456 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 375 FPS | 456 FPS |
| medium | 316 FPS | 429 FPS |
| high | 278 FPS | 375 FPS |
| ultra | 219 FPS | 302 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U | Xeon W-3225 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 455 FPS | 456 FPS |
| medium | 455 FPS | 456 FPS |
| high | 455 FPS | 456 FPS |
| ultra | 455 FPS | 456 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 455 FPS | 456 FPS |
| medium | 455 FPS | 456 FPS |
| high | 455 FPS | 456 FPS |
| ultra | 455 FPS | 456 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 455 FPS | 456 FPS |
| medium | 453 FPS | 456 FPS |
| high | 402 FPS | 456 FPS |
| ultra | 345 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U and Xeon W-3225


Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U
Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U
The Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Barcelo-U Refresh (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 18,191 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon W-3225
Xeon W-3225
The Xeon W-3225 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 16.5 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 160 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 18,251 points. Launch price was $1,199.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U and Xeon W-3225 share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U versus 4.4 GHz on the Xeon W-3225 — a 2.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U (base: 2 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U uses the Barcelo-U Refresh (2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon W-3225 uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U scores 18,191 against the Xeon W-3225's 18,251 — a 0.3% lead for the Xeon W-3225. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U vs 16.5 MB on the Xeon W-3225.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U | Xeon W-3225 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz+2% | 4.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 3.7 GHz+85% |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 16.5 MB+3% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 8 MB+1500% |
| Process | 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Barcelo-U Refresh (2023) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 18,191 | 18,251 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 11,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,150 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 9,100 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U uses the FP6 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W-3225 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U | Xeon W-3225 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP6 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 1024 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 6 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 64 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon W-3225). Primary use case: Xeon W-3225 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Xeon W-3225 rivals Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U | Xeon W-3225 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | — | Workstation |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












