Core Ultra 5 226V vs Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U

Intel

Core Ultra 5 226V

8 Cores8 Thrd17 WWMax: 4.5 GHz2024

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U

8 Cores16 Thrd15 WWMax: 4.5 GHz2023

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core Ultra 5 226V

2024

Why buy it

  • +1.1% higher PassMark.
  • Newer platform on FCBGA2833 with DDR5 support instead of FP6 and DDR4.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Arc 130V, while Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 16 MB).
  • Launch MSRP is still $300 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U

2023

Why buy it

  • +100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).
  • Draws 15W instead of 17W, a 2W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (18,191 vs 18,400).
  • Older platform position on FP6 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 5 226V moves to FCBGA2833 and DDR5.
  • No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 5 226V can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core Ultra 5 226V better than Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U?
Yes. Core Ultra 5 226V is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 0.6% average FPS lead across 5 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
Which one is better for gaming?
For gaming, the two CPUs are effectively a wash in the available data.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core Ultra 5 226V is the better fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 8 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core Ultra 5 226V is the smarter buy today. Core Ultra 5 226V is at an unclear MSRP at $300 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 0.6% average FPS lead across 5 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (61.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core Ultra 5 226V is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2023), a healthier platform with FCBGA2833 and DDR5 instead of FP6, and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 8 threads instead of 8/16. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore Ultra 5 226VRyzen 7 PRO 7730U
1080p
low180 FPS173 FPS
medium145 FPS149 FPS
high117 FPS120 FPS
ultra97 FPS101 FPS
1440p
low148 FPS148 FPS
medium117 FPS125 FPS
high95 FPS101 FPS
ultra79 FPS84 FPS
4K
low83 FPS82 FPS
medium71 FPS74 FPS
high57 FPS59 FPS
ultra44 FPS46 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore Ultra 5 226VRyzen 7 PRO 7730U
1080p
low212 FPS236 FPS
medium176 FPS201 FPS
high158 FPS176 FPS
ultra139 FPS156 FPS
1440p
low181 FPS203 FPS
medium154 FPS179 FPS
high142 FPS161 FPS
ultra122 FPS138 FPS
4K
low137 FPS140 FPS
medium122 FPS127 FPS
high115 FPS121 FPS
ultra100 FPS106 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore Ultra 5 226VRyzen 7 PRO 7730U
1080p
low460 FPS455 FPS
medium460 FPS455 FPS
high460 FPS455 FPS
ultra460 FPS426 FPS
1440p
low460 FPS455 FPS
medium460 FPS437 FPS
high460 FPS392 FPS
ultra424 FPS324 FPS
4K
low460 FPS375 FPS
medium384 FPS316 FPS
high343 FPS278 FPS
ultra272 FPS219 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore Ultra 5 226VRyzen 7 PRO 7730U
1080p
low460 FPS455 FPS
medium460 FPS455 FPS
high460 FPS455 FPS
ultra460 FPS455 FPS
1440p
low460 FPS455 FPS
medium460 FPS455 FPS
high460 FPS455 FPS
ultra460 FPS455 FPS
4K
low460 FPS455 FPS
medium460 FPS453 FPS
high460 FPS402 FPS
ultra408 FPS345 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 5 226V and Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U

Intel

Core Ultra 5 226V

The Core Ultra 5 226V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 September 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 2.5 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2833. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 18,400 points. Launch price was $299.

AMD

Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U

The Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Barcelo-U Refresh (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 18,191 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The Core Ultra 5 226V packs 8 cores / 8 threads, matching the Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U's 8 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 226V versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core Ultra 5 226V uses the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture (3 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U uses Barcelo-U Refresh (2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 226V scores 18,400 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U's 18,191 — a 1.1% lead for the Core Ultra 5 226V. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 226V vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U.

FeatureCore Ultra 5 226VRyzen 7 PRO 7730U
Cores / Threads
8 / 8
8 / 16
Boost Clock
4.5 GHz
4.5 GHz
Base Clock
2.1 GHz+5%
2 GHz
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)
16 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache
2.5 MB (per core)+400%
512K (per core)
Process
3 nm-57%
7 nm
Architecture
Lunar Lake (2024)
Barcelo-U Refresh (2023)
PassMark
18,400+1%
18,191
Cinebench R23 Multi
9,041
Geekbench 6 Single
1,962
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,898
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Ultra 5 226V uses the FCBGA2833 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U uses FP6 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore Ultra 5 226VRyzen 7 PRO 7730U
Socket
FCBGA2833
FP6
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR5X-8533
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
8
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 5 226V) / not specified (Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U). The Core Ultra 5 226V includes integrated graphics (Arc 130V), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U requires a dedicated GPU.

FeatureCore Ultra 5 226VRyzen 7 PRO 7730U
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Arc 130V
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d