
Ryzen 5 5500
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 5500
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $140 less on MSRP ($159 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 136.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 121.5 vs 51.3 PassMark/$ ($159 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
2018Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (15,342 vs 19,311).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 51.3 vs 121.5 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
Ryzen 5 5500
2022Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $140 less on MSRP ($159 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 136.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 121.5 vs 51.3 PassMark/$ ($159 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (15,342 vs 19,311).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 51.3 vs 121.5 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 5500 better than Ryzen 7 PRO 2700?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5500 | Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 181 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 150 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 97 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 122 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 37 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5500 | Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 329 FPS | 336 FPS |
| medium | 285 FPS | 297 FPS |
| high | 254 FPS | 265 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 237 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 291 FPS | 307 FPS |
| medium | 258 FPS | 278 FPS |
| high | 233 FPS | 246 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 215 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 229 FPS | 225 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 207 FPS |
| high | 189 FPS | 193 FPS |
| ultra | 162 FPS | 168 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5500 | Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 483 FPS | 384 FPS |
| medium | 483 FPS | 384 FPS |
| high | 483 FPS | 384 FPS |
| ultra | 406 FPS | 384 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 483 FPS | 384 FPS |
| medium | 411 FPS | 384 FPS |
| high | 361 FPS | 384 FPS |
| ultra | 300 FPS | 337 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 384 FPS |
| medium | 285 FPS | 319 FPS |
| high | 248 FPS | 281 FPS |
| ultra | 192 FPS | 226 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5500 | Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 483 FPS | 384 FPS |
| medium | 483 FPS | 384 FPS |
| high | 483 FPS | 384 FPS |
| ultra | 483 FPS | 384 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 483 FPS | 384 FPS |
| medium | 483 FPS | 384 FPS |
| high | 483 FPS | 384 FPS |
| ultra | 425 FPS | 384 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 448 FPS | 384 FPS |
| medium | 404 FPS | 384 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 384 FPS |
| ultra | 308 FPS | 332 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 5500 and Ryzen 7 PRO 2700


Ryzen 5 5500
Ryzen 5 5500
The Ryzen 5 5500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Cezanne (2021−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,311 points. Launch price was $159.


Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
The Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 September 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 15,342 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 5500 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5500 versus 4.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 — a 2.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 5500 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Ryzen 5 5500 uses the Cezanne (2021−2025) architecture (7 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 uses Zen+ (2018−2019) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 5500 scores 19,311 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700's 15,342 — a 22.9% lead for the Ryzen 5 5500. L3 cache: 16 MB on the Ryzen 5 5500 vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5500 | Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz+2% | 4.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+12% | 3.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm-42% | 12 nm |
| Architecture | Cezanne (2021−2025) | Zen+ (2018−2019) |
| PassMark | 19,311+26% | 15,342 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the AM4 socket with PCIe 3.0.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5500 | Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5500) / not specified (Ryzen 7 PRO 2700). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 5500 targets Desktop.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5500 | Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 5 5500 launched at $159 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 debuted at $299. On MSRP ($159 vs $299), the Ryzen 5 5500 is $140 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 5500 delivers 121.5 pts/$ vs 51.3 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 — making the Ryzen 5 5500 the 81.2% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5500 | Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $159-47% | $299 |
| Performance per Dollar | 121.5+137% | 51.3 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2018 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













