PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 7 8845HS

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 45W instead of 140W, a 95W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2066 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 780M, while Xeon W-2191B needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 25 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-2191B, which brings 18 cores / 36 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.

Xeon W-2191B

2017

Why buy it

✅+54.7% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 18 cores / 36 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅140% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 8845HS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (28,362 vs 28,470).
❌Launch MSRP is still $1,333 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 8845HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌211.1% higher power demand at 140W vs 45W.
❌Older platform position on LGA2066 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 8845HS moves to FP8 and DDR5.

Ryzen 7 8845HS

2023

Xeon W-2191B

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 45W instead of 140W, a 95W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2066 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 780M, while Xeon W-2191B needs a discrete GPU.

Why buy it

✅+54.7% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 18 cores / 36 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅140% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 25 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-2191B, which brings 18 cores / 36 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 8845HS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (28,362 vs 28,470).
❌Launch MSRP is still $1,333 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 8845HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌211.1% higher power demand at 140W vs 45W.
❌Older platform position on LGA2066 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 8845HS moves to FP8 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 8845HS better than Xeon W-2191B?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon W-2191B makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 8845HS is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 7 8845HS is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 4.7% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 8845HS is the better fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 8845HS is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon W-2191B makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Ryzen 7 8845HS is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $1,333 MSRP, and it gives you a 4.7% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon W-2191B is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (21.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 8845HS is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2017), a healthier platform with FP8 and DDR5 instead of LGA2066, and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 18/36. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 7 8845HS Benchmark Check

Xeon W-2191B Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 7 8845HS	Xeon W-2191B
1080p
low	265 FPS	168 FPS
medium	240 FPS	147 FPS
high	202 FPS	120 FPS
ultra	174 FPS	98 FPS
1440p
low	234 FPS	140 FPS
medium	192 FPS	119 FPS
high	156 FPS	96 FPS
ultra	138 FPS	79 FPS
4K
low	162 FPS	74 FPS
medium	135 FPS	67 FPS
high	104 FPS	53 FPS
ultra	91 FPS	41 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 8845HS Open Xeon W-2191B

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 7 8845HS	Xeon W-2191B
1080p
low	486 FPS	430 FPS
medium	399 FPS	380 FPS
high	341 FPS	331 FPS
ultra	304 FPS	301 FPS
1440p
low	424 FPS	378 FPS
medium	367 FPS	339 FPS
high	314 FPS	297 FPS
ultra	267 FPS	260 FPS
4K
low	280 FPS	247 FPS
medium	253 FPS	220 FPS
high	237 FPS	207 FPS
ultra	204 FPS	181 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 8845HS Open Xeon W-2191B

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 7 8845HS	Xeon W-2191B
1080p
low	712 FPS	709 FPS
medium	712 FPS	709 FPS
high	712 FPS	709 FPS
ultra	623 FPS	658 FPS
1440p
low	712 FPS	709 FPS
medium	644 FPS	693 FPS
high	544 FPS	641 FPS
ultra	467 FPS	567 FPS
4K
low	540 FPS	511 FPS
medium	474 FPS	426 FPS
high	421 FPS	383 FPS
ultra	357 FPS	318 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 8845HS Open Xeon W-2191B

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 7 8845HS	Xeon W-2191B
1080p
low	712 FPS	709 FPS
medium	712 FPS	709 FPS
high	712 FPS	709 FPS
ultra	712 FPS	675 FPS
1440p
low	712 FPS	709 FPS
medium	712 FPS	709 FPS
high	657 FPS	654 FPS
ultra	572 FPS	553 FPS
4K
low	574 FPS	615 FPS
medium	511 FPS	549 FPS
high	455 FPS	480 FPS
ultra	393 FPS	407 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 8845HS Open Xeon W-2191B

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 8845HS and Xeon W-2191B

Ryzen 7 8845HS

The Ryzen 7 8845HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 28,470 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon W-2191B

The Xeon W-2191B is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 24.75 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 28,362 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 7 8845HS packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon W-2191B offers 18 cores / 36 threads — the Xeon W-2191B has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 8845HS versus 4.3 GHz on the Xeon W-2191B — a 17% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 8845HS (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Ryzen 7 8845HS uses the Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon W-2191B uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 8845HS scores 28,470 against the Xeon W-2191B's 28,362 — a 0.4% lead for the Ryzen 7 8845HS. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 8845HS vs 24.75 MB (total) on the Xeon W-2191B.

Feature	Ryzen 7 8845HS	Xeon W-2191B
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	18 / 36+125%
Boost Clock	5.1 GHz+19%	4.3 GHz
Base Clock	3.8 GHz+65%	2.3 GHz
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)	24.75 MB (total)+55%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1 MB (per core)
Process	4 nm-71%	14 nm
Architecture	Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024)	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	28,470	28,362
Cinebench R23 Multi	17,500	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,500	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	12,250	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 8845HS uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-2191B uses LGA2066 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR5x-7500 on the Ryzen 7 8845HS versus DDR4-2666 on the Xeon W-2191B — the Ryzen 7 8845HS supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon W-2191B supports up to 512 GB of RAM compared to 256 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 8845HS) vs 4 (Xeon W-2191B). PCIe lanes: 20 (Ryzen 7 8845HS) vs 48 (Xeon W-2191B) — the Xeon W-2191B offers 28 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	Ryzen 7 8845HS	Xeon W-2191B
Socket	FP8	LGA2066
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	LPDDR5x-7500+25%	DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity	256 GB	512 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	48+140%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V (SVM) (Ryzen 7 8845HS) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon W-2191B). The Ryzen 7 8845HS includes integrated graphics (Radeon 780M), while the Xeon W-2191B requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 8845HS targets Gaming, Xeon W-2191B targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 8845HS rivals Core i7-13700H.