
Ryzen 7 8840U
Popular choices:

Xeon W-2175
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 8840U
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +18.3% higher average FPS across 32 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 140W, a 112W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2066 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (23,415 vs 23,507).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 19 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-2175, which brings 14 cores / 28 threads.
Xeon W-2175
2017Why buy it
- ✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
- ✅+20.3% larger total L3 cache (19 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 14 cores / 28 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 8840U across 32 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $1,947 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 8840U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌400% higher power demand at 140W vs 28W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2066 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 8840U moves to FP8 and DDR5.
Ryzen 7 8840U
2023Xeon W-2175
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +18.3% higher average FPS across 32 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 140W, a 112W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2066 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
- ✅+20.3% larger total L3 cache (19 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 14 cores / 28 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (23,415 vs 23,507).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 19 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-2175, which brings 14 cores / 28 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 8840U across 32 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $1,947 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 8840U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌400% higher power demand at 140W vs 28W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2066 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 8840U moves to FP8 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 8840U better than Xeon W-2175?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 8840U | Xeon W-2175 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 255 FPS | 167 FPS |
| medium | 235 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 198 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 97 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 227 FPS | 139 FPS |
| medium | 189 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 136 FPS | 79 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 157 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 103 FPS | 53 FPS |
| ultra | 91 FPS | 41 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 8840U | Xeon W-2175 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 469 FPS | 430 FPS |
| medium | 388 FPS | 380 FPS |
| high | 336 FPS | 329 FPS |
| ultra | 301 FPS | 298 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 410 FPS | 378 FPS |
| medium | 358 FPS | 339 FPS |
| high | 310 FPS | 294 FPS |
| ultra | 265 FPS | 257 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 245 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 219 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 204 FPS |
| ultra | 202 FPS | 178 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 8840U | Xeon W-2175 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 585 FPS | 588 FPS |
| medium | 585 FPS | 588 FPS |
| high | 585 FPS | 588 FPS |
| ultra | 585 FPS | 588 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 585 FPS | 588 FPS |
| medium | 585 FPS | 588 FPS |
| high | 525 FPS | 588 FPS |
| ultra | 451 FPS | 567 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 521 FPS | 511 FPS |
| medium | 458 FPS | 426 FPS |
| high | 406 FPS | 383 FPS |
| ultra | 345 FPS | 317 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 8840U | Xeon W-2175 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 585 FPS | 588 FPS |
| medium | 585 FPS | 588 FPS |
| high | 585 FPS | 588 FPS |
| ultra | 585 FPS | 588 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 585 FPS | 588 FPS |
| medium | 585 FPS | 588 FPS |
| high | 585 FPS | 588 FPS |
| ultra | 548 FPS | 557 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 559 FPS | 588 FPS |
| medium | 501 FPS | 554 FPS |
| high | 446 FPS | 485 FPS |
| ultra | 384 FPS | 410 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 8840U and Xeon W-2175


Ryzen 7 8840U
Ryzen 7 8840U
The Ryzen 7 8840U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 23,415 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon W-2175
Xeon W-2175
The Xeon W-2175 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 October 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 19.25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400, DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 23,507 points. Launch price was $1,947.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 8840U packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon W-2175 offers 14 cores / 28 threads — the Xeon W-2175 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 8840U versus 4.3 GHz on the Xeon W-2175 — a 17% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 8840U (base: 3.3 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Ryzen 7 8840U uses the Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon W-2175 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 8840U scores 23,415 against the Xeon W-2175's 23,507 — a 0.4% lead for the Xeon W-2175. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 8840U vs 19.25 MB (total) on the Xeon W-2175.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 8840U | Xeon W-2175 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 14 / 28+75% |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+19% | 4.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.3 GHz+32% | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 19.25 MB (total)+20% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-71% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025) | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 23,415 | 23,507 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 8840U uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-2175 uses LGA2066 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 8840U | Xeon W-2175 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP8 | LGA2066 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












