
Core i9-7920X
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 8840U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i9-7920X
2017Why buy it
- ✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 8840U across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $1,199 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 8840U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌400% higher power demand at 140W vs 28W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2066 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 8840U moves to FP8 and DDR5.
Ryzen 7 8840U
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +26.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 140W, a 112W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2066 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (23,415 vs 23,508).
Core i9-7920X
2017Ryzen 7 8840U
2023Why buy it
- ✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +26.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 140W, a 112W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2066 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 8840U across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $1,199 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 8840U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌400% higher power demand at 140W vs 28W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2066 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 8840U moves to FP8 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (23,415 vs 23,508).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 8840U better than Core i9-7920X?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i9-7920X | Ryzen 7 8840U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 255 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 235 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 198 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 170 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 140 FPS | 227 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 136 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 76 FPS | 157 FPS |
| medium | 70 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 91 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i9-7920X | Ryzen 7 8840U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 352 FPS | 468 FPS |
| medium | 300 FPS | 388 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 336 FPS |
| ultra | 243 FPS | 301 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 315 FPS | 409 FPS |
| medium | 274 FPS | 358 FPS |
| high | 249 FPS | 310 FPS |
| ultra | 215 FPS | 265 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 227 FPS | 269 FPS |
| medium | 201 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 191 FPS | 234 FPS |
| ultra | 162 FPS | 202 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i9-7920X | Ryzen 7 8840U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 560 FPS | 585 FPS |
| medium | 468 FPS | 585 FPS |
| high | 420 FPS | 585 FPS |
| ultra | 366 FPS | 585 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 507 FPS | 585 FPS |
| medium | 431 FPS | 585 FPS |
| high | 385 FPS | 525 FPS |
| ultra | 334 FPS | 451 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 390 FPS | 521 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 458 FPS |
| high | 284 FPS | 406 FPS |
| ultra | 231 FPS | 345 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i9-7920X | Ryzen 7 8840U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 588 FPS | 585 FPS |
| medium | 588 FPS | 585 FPS |
| high | 588 FPS | 585 FPS |
| ultra | 588 FPS | 585 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 588 FPS | 585 FPS |
| medium | 588 FPS | 585 FPS |
| high | 579 FPS | 585 FPS |
| ultra | 502 FPS | 548 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 531 FPS | 559 FPS |
| medium | 480 FPS | 501 FPS |
| high | 424 FPS | 446 FPS |
| ultra | 366 FPS | 384 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-7920X and Ryzen 7 8840U

Core i9-7920X
Core i9-7920X
The Core i9-7920X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 September 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 16.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 23,508 points. Launch price was $1,199.


Ryzen 7 8840U
Ryzen 7 8840U
The Ryzen 7 8840U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 23,415 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i9-7920X packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Ryzen 7 8840U offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i9-7920X has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i9-7920X versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 8840U — a 14.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 8840U (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i9-7920X uses the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 8840U uses Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-7920X scores 23,508 against the Ryzen 7 8840U's 23,415 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i9-7920X. L3 cache: 16.5 MB (total) on the Core i9-7920X vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 8840U.
| Feature | Core i9-7920X | Ryzen 7 8840U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24+50% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 5.1 GHz+16% |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz | 3.3 GHz+14% |
| L3 Cache | 16.5 MB (total)+3% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 4 nm-71% |
| Architecture | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) | Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025) |
| PassMark | 23,508 | 23,415 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-7920X uses the LGA2066 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 8840U uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i9-7920X | Ryzen 7 8840U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2066 | FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











