PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i7-14700T

2024

Why buy it

✅+36.2% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅+106.3% larger total L3 cache (33 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD 770, while Ryzen 7 8700F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 8700F across 42 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 82.3 vs 115.7 PassMark/$ ($384 MSRP vs $270 MSRP).

Ryzen 7 8700F

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +16.0% higher average FPS across 42 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $114 less on MSRP ($270 MSRP vs $384 MSRP).
✅Delivers 40.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 115.7 vs 82.3 PassMark/$ ($270 MSRP vs $384 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (13,500 vs 18,390).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 33 MB).
❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-14700T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i7-14700T

2024

Ryzen 7 8700F

2024

Why buy it

✅+36.2% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅+106.3% larger total L3 cache (33 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD 770, while Ryzen 7 8700F needs a discrete GPU.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +16.0% higher average FPS across 42 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $114 less on MSRP ($270 MSRP vs $384 MSRP).
✅Delivers 40.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 115.7 vs 82.3 PassMark/$ ($270 MSRP vs $384 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 8700F across 42 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 82.3 vs 115.7 PassMark/$ ($384 MSRP vs $270 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (13,500 vs 18,390).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 33 MB).
❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-14700T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 8700F better than Core i7-14700T?

It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Ryzen 7 8700F is ahead with a 16.0% average FPS lead across 42 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-14700T pulls ahead with 36.2% better Geekbench multi-core. Core i7-14700T also has the bigger cache pool with 106.3% larger total L3 cache (33 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-14700T is the better fit. You are getting 36.2% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 20 cores and 28 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 106.3% larger total L3 cache (33 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 8700F is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 7 8700F is $114 cheaper on MSRP at $270 MSRP versus $384 MSRP, and it gives you a 16.0% average FPS lead across 42 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that Core i7-14700T is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 36.2% better Geekbench multi-core. It is also 40.6% better value on MSRP (115.7 vs 82.3 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible LGA1700 + DDR5 setup, Core i7-14700T can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap, but on MSRP alone you would want to find it meaningfully cheaper in real-world listings before that path becomes easy to justify.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 8700F is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more overall headroom and a better platform outlook.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i7-14700T Benchmark Check

Ryzen 7 8700F Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i7-14700T	Ryzen 7 8700F
1080p
low	315 FPS	266 FPS
medium	306 FPS	240 FPS
high	243 FPS	206 FPS
ultra	204 FPS	176 FPS
1440p
low	272 FPS	233 FPS
medium	235 FPS	190 FPS
high	175 FPS	158 FPS
ultra	153 FPS	138 FPS
4K
low	186 FPS	158 FPS
medium	160 FPS	131 FPS
high	119 FPS	102 FPS
ultra	107 FPS	88 FPS

Open Core i7-14700T Open Ryzen 7 8700F

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i7-14700T	Ryzen 7 8700F
1080p
low	345 FPS	483 FPS
medium	294 FPS	403 FPS
high	247 FPS	347 FPS
ultra	225 FPS	308 FPS
1440p
low	300 FPS	423 FPS
medium	265 FPS	374 FPS
high	224 FPS	322 FPS
ultra	193 FPS	273 FPS
4K
low	177 FPS	283 FPS
medium	160 FPS	259 FPS
high	152 FPS	244 FPS
ultra	133 FPS	209 FPS

Open Core i7-14700T Open Ryzen 7 8700F

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i7-14700T	Ryzen 7 8700F
1080p
low	646 FPS	781 FPS
medium	528 FPS	781 FPS
high	465 FPS	767 FPS
ultra	403 FPS	649 FPS
1440p
low	588 FPS	766 FPS
medium	488 FPS	629 FPS
high	424 FPS	544 FPS
ultra	368 FPS	463 FPS
4K
low	431 FPS	530 FPS
medium	371 FPS	457 FPS
high	336 FPS	402 FPS
ultra	288 FPS	338 FPS

Open Core i7-14700T Open Ryzen 7 8700F

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i7-14700T	Ryzen 7 8700F
1080p
low	790 FPS	781 FPS
medium	790 FPS	781 FPS
high	717 FPS	781 FPS
ultra	644 FPS	781 FPS
1440p
low	772 FPS	781 FPS
medium	688 FPS	781 FPS
high	592 FPS	692 FPS
ultra	522 FPS	602 FPS
4K
low	545 FPS	615 FPS
medium	494 FPS	553 FPS
high	440 FPS	495 FPS
ultra	384 FPS	431 FPS

Open Core i7-14700T Open Ryzen 7 8700F

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-14700T and Ryzen 7 8700F

Core i7-14700T

The Core i7-14700T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 20 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 33 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 31,604 points. Launch price was $384.

Ryzen 7 8700F

The Ryzen 7 8700F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Phoenix (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.1 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 31,240 points. Launch price was $270.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-14700T packs 20 cores / 28 threads, while the Ryzen 7 8700F offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i7-14700T has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Core i7-14700T versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen 7 8700F — a 3.9% clock advantage for the Core i7-14700T (base: 1.3 GHz vs 4.1 GHz). The Core i7-14700T uses the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 7 8700F uses Phoenix (2023−2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-14700T scores 31,604 against the Ryzen 7 8700F's 31,240 — a 1.2% lead for the Core i7-14700T. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,723 vs 2,649, a 2.8% lead for the Core i7-14700T that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 18,390 vs 13,500 (30.7% advantage for the Core i7-14700T). L3 cache: 33 MB (total) on the Core i7-14700T vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 8700F.

Feature	Core i7-14700T	Ryzen 7 8700F
Cores / Threads	20 / 28+150%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	5.2 GHz+4%	5 GHz
Base Clock	1.3 GHz	4.1 GHz+215%
L3 Cache	33 MB (total)+106%	16 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)+100%	1 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	4 nm-43%
Architecture	Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025)	Phoenix (2023−2024)
PassMark	31,604+1%	31,240
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	18,040
Geekbench 6 Single	2,723+3%	2,649
Geekbench 6 Multi	18,390+36%	13,500

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-14700T uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 8700F uses AM5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5600 memory speed. The Ryzen 7 8700F supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 28.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Z790,B760,H770,Z690,B660,H610 (Core i7-14700T) and XB650,B650,A620 (Ryzen 7 8700F).

Feature	Core i7-14700T	Ryzen 7 8700F
Socket	LGA1700	AM5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600	DDR5-5200
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	256 GB+33%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	20	20

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 7 8700F has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen 7 8700F supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-14700T) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 8700F). The Core i7-14700T includes integrated graphics (UHD 770), while the Ryzen 7 8700F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-14700T targets Productivity, Ryzen 7 8700F targets High-performance Gaming w/ dGPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-14700T rivals Ryzen 7 7700; Ryzen 7 8700F rivals Core i7-14700F.

Feature	Core i7-14700T	Ryzen 7 8700F
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	UHD 770	—
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	AMD-V
Target Use	Productivity	High-performance Gaming w/ dGPU

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i7-14700T launched at $384 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 8700F debuted at $270. On MSRP ($384 vs $270), the Ryzen 7 8700F is $114 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-14700T delivers 82.3 pts/$ vs 115.7 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 8700F — making the Ryzen 7 8700F the 33.7% better value option.