
Core i9-11900KF
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 7840U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i9-11900KF
2021Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 47.9 vs 61.4 PassMark/$ ($513 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ❌346.4% higher power demand at 125W vs 28W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 7840U moves to FP8 and DDR5.
Ryzen 7 7840U
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $113 less on MSRP ($400 MSRP vs $513 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 28.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 61.4 vs 47.9 PassMark/$ ($400 MSRP vs $513 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 125W, a 97W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (24,547 vs 24,585).
Core i9-11900KF
2021Ryzen 7 7840U
2023Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $113 less on MSRP ($400 MSRP vs $513 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 28.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 61.4 vs 47.9 PassMark/$ ($400 MSRP vs $513 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 125W, a 97W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 47.9 vs 61.4 PassMark/$ ($513 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ❌346.4% higher power demand at 125W vs 28W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 7840U moves to FP8 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (24,547 vs 24,585).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-11900KF better than Ryzen 7 7840U?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i9-11900KF | Ryzen 7 7840U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 295 FPS | 257 FPS |
| medium | 261 FPS | 237 FPS |
| high | 220 FPS | 200 FPS |
| ultra | 189 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 242 FPS | 228 FPS |
| medium | 192 FPS | 191 FPS |
| high | 157 FPS | 155 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 104 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 91 FPS | 92 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i9-11900KF | Ryzen 7 7840U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 615 FPS | 477 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 395 FPS |
| high | 457 FPS | 342 FPS |
| ultra | 407 FPS | 306 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 601 FPS | 417 FPS |
| medium | 490 FPS | 364 FPS |
| high | 422 FPS | 315 FPS |
| ultra | 362 FPS | 270 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 401 FPS | 275 FPS |
| medium | 339 FPS | 251 FPS |
| high | 320 FPS | 238 FPS |
| ultra | 275 FPS | 206 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i9-11900KF | Ryzen 7 7840U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 615 FPS | 614 FPS |
| medium | 615 FPS | 614 FPS |
| high | 615 FPS | 614 FPS |
| ultra | 563 FPS | 595 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 615 FPS | 614 FPS |
| medium | 615 FPS | 614 FPS |
| high | 543 FPS | 526 FPS |
| ultra | 464 FPS | 452 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 577 FPS | 525 FPS |
| medium | 480 FPS | 459 FPS |
| high | 427 FPS | 407 FPS |
| ultra | 357 FPS | 345 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i9-11900KF | Ryzen 7 7840U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 615 FPS | 614 FPS |
| medium | 615 FPS | 614 FPS |
| high | 615 FPS | 614 FPS |
| ultra | 615 FPS | 614 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 615 FPS | 614 FPS |
| medium | 615 FPS | 614 FPS |
| high | 615 FPS | 614 FPS |
| ultra | 615 FPS | 549 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 615 FPS | 560 FPS |
| medium | 565 FPS | 502 FPS |
| high | 512 FPS | 447 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 384 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-11900KF and Ryzen 7 7840U

Core i9-11900KF
Core i9-11900KF
The Core i9-11900KF is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 24,585 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 7 7840U
Ryzen 7 7840U
The Ryzen 7 7840U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Maio 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-U (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600. Passmark benchmark score: 24,547 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
Both the Core i9-11900KF and Ryzen 7 7840U share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Core i9-11900KF versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7840U — a 1.9% clock advantage for the Core i9-11900KF (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i9-11900KF uses the Rocket Lake (2021) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 7840U uses Phoenix-U (Zen 4) (2023) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-11900KF scores 24,585 against the Ryzen 7 7840U's 24,547 — a 0.2% lead for the Core i9-11900KF. Both processors carry 16 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core i9-11900KF | Ryzen 7 7840U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5.2 GHz+2% | 5.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+6% | 3.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+300% |
| Process | 14 nm | 4 nm-71% |
| Architecture | Rocket Lake (2021) | Phoenix-U (Zen 4) (2023) |
| PassMark | 24,585 | 24,547 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 15,500 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-11900KF uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 7840U uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i9-11900KF | Ryzen 7 7840U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-11900KF) / not specified (Ryzen 7 7840U).
| Feature | Core i9-11900KF | Ryzen 7 7840U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i9-11900KF launched at $513 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 7840U debuted at $400. On MSRP ($513 vs $400), the Ryzen 7 7840U is $113 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-11900KF delivers 47.9 pts/$ vs 61.4 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 7840U — making the Ryzen 7 7840U the 24.6% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-11900KF | Ryzen 7 7840U |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $513 | $400-22% |
| Performance per Dollar | 47.9 | 61.4+28% |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












