
Core i5-12600HX
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 7840U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-12600HX
2022Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while Ryzen 7 7840U needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7840U across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (24,396 vs 24,547).
- ❌96.4% higher power demand at 55W vs 28W.
Ryzen 7 7840U
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +20.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 55W, a 27W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $400 MSRP, while Core i5-12600HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-12600HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i5-12600HX
2022Ryzen 7 7840U
2023Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while Ryzen 7 7840U needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +20.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 55W, a 27W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7840U across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (24,396 vs 24,547).
- ❌96.4% higher power demand at 55W vs 28W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $400 MSRP, while Core i5-12600HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-12600HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 7840U better than Core i5-12600HX?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-12600HX | Ryzen 7 7840U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 257 FPS |
| medium | 154 FPS | 237 FPS |
| high | 127 FPS | 200 FPS |
| ultra | 107 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 228 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 191 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 155 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 92 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-12600HX | Ryzen 7 7840U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 546 FPS | 477 FPS |
| medium | 465 FPS | 395 FPS |
| high | 389 FPS | 342 FPS |
| ultra | 355 FPS | 306 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 456 FPS | 417 FPS |
| medium | 401 FPS | 364 FPS |
| high | 344 FPS | 315 FPS |
| ultra | 300 FPS | 270 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 275 FPS | 275 FPS |
| medium | 243 FPS | 251 FPS |
| high | 228 FPS | 238 FPS |
| ultra | 203 FPS | 206 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-12600HX | Ryzen 7 7840U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 610 FPS | 614 FPS |
| medium | 519 FPS | 614 FPS |
| high | 477 FPS | 614 FPS |
| ultra | 420 FPS | 595 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 567 FPS | 614 FPS |
| medium | 475 FPS | 614 FPS |
| high | 427 FPS | 526 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 452 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 449 FPS | 525 FPS |
| medium | 368 FPS | 459 FPS |
| high | 327 FPS | 407 FPS |
| ultra | 267 FPS | 345 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-12600HX | Ryzen 7 7840U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 610 FPS | 614 FPS |
| medium | 610 FPS | 614 FPS |
| high | 610 FPS | 614 FPS |
| ultra | 588 FPS | 614 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 610 FPS | 614 FPS |
| medium | 610 FPS | 614 FPS |
| high | 563 FPS | 614 FPS |
| ultra | 492 FPS | 549 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 507 FPS | 560 FPS |
| medium | 463 FPS | 502 FPS |
| high | 414 FPS | 447 FPS |
| ultra | 361 FPS | 384 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-12600HX and Ryzen 7 7840U

Core i5-12600HX
Core i5-12600HX
The Core i5-12600HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 May 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-HX (2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1964. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 24,396 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 7 7840U
Ryzen 7 7840U
The Ryzen 7 7840U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Maio 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-U (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600. Passmark benchmark score: 24,547 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i5-12600HX packs 12 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 7 7840U offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-12600HX has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-12600HX versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7840U — a 10.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 7840U (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i5-12600HX uses the Alder Lake-HX (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 7 7840U uses Phoenix-U (Zen 4) (2023) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12600HX scores 24,396 against the Ryzen 7 7840U's 24,547 — a 0.6% lead for the Ryzen 7 7840U. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12600HX vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 7840U.
| Feature | Core i5-12600HX | Ryzen 7 7840U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 16+50% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz | 5.1 GHz+11% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.3 GHz+32% |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total)+13% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+25% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-HX (2022) | Phoenix-U (Zen 4) (2023) |
| PassMark | 24,396 | 24,547 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,434 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-12600HX uses the FCBGA1964 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 7840U uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-12600HX | Ryzen 7 7840U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1964 | FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 48 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12600HX) / not specified (Ryzen 7 7840U). The Core i5-12600HX includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), while the Ryzen 7 7840U requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-12600HX targets Workstation Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i5-12600HX rivals Ryzen 7 6800H.
| Feature | Core i5-12600HX | Ryzen 7 7840U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 770 | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Workstation Laptop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











