
Core 7 240H
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 7840U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core 7 240H
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌60.7% higher power demand at 45W vs 28W.
Ryzen 7 7840U
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 45W, a 17W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core 7 240H across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (24,547 vs 24,698).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $400 MSRP, while Core 7 240H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Core 7 240H
2024Ryzen 7 7840U
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 45W, a 17W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌60.7% higher power demand at 45W vs 28W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core 7 240H across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (24,547 vs 24,698).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $400 MSRP, while Core 7 240H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Quick Answers
So, is Core 7 240H better than Ryzen 7 7840U?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core 7 240H | Ryzen 7 7840U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 285 FPS | 257 FPS |
| medium | 262 FPS | 237 FPS |
| high | 222 FPS | 200 FPS |
| ultra | 190 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 236 FPS | 228 FPS |
| medium | 194 FPS | 191 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 155 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 166 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 104 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 91 FPS | 92 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core 7 240H | Ryzen 7 7840U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 617 FPS | 477 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 395 FPS |
| high | 463 FPS | 342 FPS |
| ultra | 415 FPS | 306 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 609 FPS | 417 FPS |
| medium | 509 FPS | 364 FPS |
| high | 421 FPS | 315 FPS |
| ultra | 356 FPS | 270 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 275 FPS |
| medium | 307 FPS | 251 FPS |
| high | 285 FPS | 238 FPS |
| ultra | 247 FPS | 206 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core 7 240H | Ryzen 7 7840U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 617 FPS | 614 FPS |
| medium | 617 FPS | 614 FPS |
| high | 617 FPS | 614 FPS |
| ultra | 601 FPS | 595 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 617 FPS | 614 FPS |
| medium | 617 FPS | 614 FPS |
| high | 578 FPS | 526 FPS |
| ultra | 496 FPS | 452 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 587 FPS | 525 FPS |
| medium | 489 FPS | 459 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 407 FPS |
| ultra | 374 FPS | 345 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core 7 240H | Ryzen 7 7840U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 617 FPS | 614 FPS |
| medium | 617 FPS | 614 FPS |
| high | 617 FPS | 614 FPS |
| ultra | 617 FPS | 614 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 617 FPS | 614 FPS |
| medium | 617 FPS | 614 FPS |
| high | 617 FPS | 614 FPS |
| ultra | 617 FPS | 549 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 617 FPS | 560 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 502 FPS |
| high | 502 FPS | 447 FPS |
| ultra | 434 FPS | 384 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 7 240H and Ryzen 7 7840U

Core 7 240H
Core 7 240H
The Core 7 240H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 18 December 2024 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4X-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 24,698 points. Launch price was $502.


Ryzen 7 7840U
Ryzen 7 7840U
The Ryzen 7 7840U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Maio 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-U (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600. Passmark benchmark score: 24,547 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core 7 240H packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 7 7840U offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core 7 240H has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Core 7 240H versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7840U — a 1.9% clock advantage for the Core 7 240H (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core 7 240H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen 7 7840U uses Phoenix-U (Zen 4) (2023) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core 7 240H scores 24,698 against the Ryzen 7 7840U's 24,547 — a 0.6% lead for the Core 7 240H. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core 7 240H vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 7840U.
| Feature | Core 7 240H | Ryzen 7 7840U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 16+25% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5.2 GHz+2% | 5.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.3 GHz+32% |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total)+50% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm | 4 nm-60% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) | Phoenix-U (Zen 4) (2023) |
| PassMark | 24,698 | 24,547 |
Memory & Platform
The Core 7 240H uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 7840U uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core 7 240H | Ryzen 7 7840U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












