Core 7 240H vs Ryzen 7 7840U

Intel

Core 7 240H

10 Cores16 Thrd45 WWMax: 5.2 GHz2024

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen 7 7840U

8 Cores16 Thrd28 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2023

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core 7 240H

2024

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +8.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).

Trade-offs

  • 60.7% higher power demand at 45W vs 28W.

Ryzen 7 7840U

2023

Why buy it

  • Draws 28W instead of 45W, a 17W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core 7 240H across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (24,547 vs 24,698).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
  • Launch MSRP is still $400 MSRP, while Core 7 240H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is Core 7 240H better than Ryzen 7 7840U?
Yes. Core 7 240H is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 8.0% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.6% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core 7 240H is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 8.0% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core 7 240H is the better fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core 7 240H is the smarter buy by a wide margin for any fresh desktop build. Core 7 240H is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $400 MSRP, and it gives you a 8.0% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 7 7840U only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop CPU, not because it is a serious desktop gaming option. It simply cannot keep up with modern games, especially when the gap is already 8.0% in the shared gaming data.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core 7 240H is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2023), 50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 16 threads instead of 8/16. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore 7 240HRyzen 7 7840U
1080p
low285 FPS257 FPS
medium262 FPS237 FPS
high222 FPS200 FPS
ultra190 FPS173 FPS
1440p
low236 FPS228 FPS
medium194 FPS191 FPS
high158 FPS155 FPS
ultra138 FPS138 FPS
4K
low166 FPS159 FPS
medium135 FPS134 FPS
high104 FPS104 FPS
ultra91 FPS92 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore 7 240HRyzen 7 7840U
1080p
low617 FPS477 FPS
medium561 FPS395 FPS
high463 FPS342 FPS
ultra415 FPS306 FPS
1440p
low609 FPS417 FPS
medium509 FPS364 FPS
high421 FPS315 FPS
ultra356 FPS270 FPS
4K
low358 FPS275 FPS
medium307 FPS251 FPS
high285 FPS238 FPS
ultra247 FPS206 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore 7 240HRyzen 7 7840U
1080p
low617 FPS614 FPS
medium617 FPS614 FPS
high617 FPS614 FPS
ultra601 FPS595 FPS
1440p
low617 FPS614 FPS
medium617 FPS614 FPS
high578 FPS526 FPS
ultra496 FPS452 FPS
4K
low587 FPS525 FPS
medium489 FPS459 FPS
high442 FPS407 FPS
ultra374 FPS345 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore 7 240HRyzen 7 7840U
1080p
low617 FPS614 FPS
medium617 FPS614 FPS
high617 FPS614 FPS
ultra617 FPS614 FPS
1440p
low617 FPS614 FPS
medium617 FPS614 FPS
high617 FPS614 FPS
ultra617 FPS549 FPS
4K
low617 FPS560 FPS
medium557 FPS502 FPS
high502 FPS447 FPS
ultra434 FPS384 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core 7 240H and Ryzen 7 7840U

Intel

Core 7 240H

The Core 7 240H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 18 December 2024 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4X-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 24,698 points. Launch price was $502.

AMD

Ryzen 7 7840U

The Ryzen 7 7840U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Maio 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-U (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600. Passmark benchmark score: 24,547 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The Core 7 240H packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 7 7840U offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core 7 240H has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Core 7 240H versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7840U — a 1.9% clock advantage for the Core 7 240H (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core 7 240H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen 7 7840U uses Phoenix-U (Zen 4) (2023) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core 7 240H scores 24,698 against the Ryzen 7 7840U's 24,547 — a 0.6% lead for the Core 7 240H. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core 7 240H vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 7840U.

FeatureCore 7 240HRyzen 7 7840U
Cores / Threads
10 / 16+25%
8 / 16
Boost Clock
5.2 GHz+2%
5.1 GHz
Base Clock
2.5 GHz
3.3 GHz+32%
L3 Cache
24 MB (total)+50%
16 MB (total)
L2 Cache
2 MB (per core)+100%
1 MB (per core)
Process
10 nm
4 nm-60%
Architecture
Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024)
Phoenix-U (Zen 4) (2023)
PassMark
24,698
24,547
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 7 240H uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 7840U uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore 7 240HRyzen 7 7840U
Socket
FCBGA1744
FP8
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+25%
PCIe 4.0