PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 7 7840S

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 8W instead of 140W, a 132W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP7/FP7r2/FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2066 and DDR4.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 780M, while Xeon W-2175 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (23,290 vs 23,507).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 19 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-2175, which brings 14 cores / 28 threads.

Xeon W-2175

2017

Why buy it

✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
✅+20.3% larger total L3 cache (19 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 14 cores / 28 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7840S across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Launch MSRP is still $1,947 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 7840S mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌1650% higher power demand at 140W vs 8W.
❌Older platform position on LGA2066 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 7840S moves to FP7/FP7r2/FP8 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 7840S can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Ryzen 7 7840S

2023

Xeon W-2175

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 8W instead of 140W, a 132W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP7/FP7r2/FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2066 and DDR4.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 780M, while Xeon W-2175 needs a discrete GPU.

Why buy it

✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
✅+20.3% larger total L3 cache (19 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 14 cores / 28 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (23,290 vs 23,507).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 19 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-2175, which brings 14 cores / 28 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7840S across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Launch MSRP is still $1,947 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 7840S mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌1650% higher power demand at 140W vs 8W.
❌Older platform position on LGA2066 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 7840S moves to FP7/FP7r2/FP8 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 7840S can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 7840S better than Xeon W-2175?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon W-2175 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 7840S is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-2175 is the better fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 14 cores and 28 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 20.3% larger total L3 cache (19 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 7840S is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon W-2175 makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Ryzen 7 7840S is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $1,947 MSRP, and it gives you a 3.5% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that Xeon W-2175 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.9% better PassMark. Xeon W-2175 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (12.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 7840S is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2017), a healthier platform with FP7/FP7r2/FP8 and DDR5 instead of LGA2066, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 7 7840S Benchmark Check

Xeon W-2175 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 7 7840S	Xeon W-2175
1080p
low	269 FPS	167 FPS
medium	243 FPS	147 FPS
high	204 FPS	119 FPS
ultra	176 FPS	97 FPS
1440p
low	236 FPS	139 FPS
medium	193 FPS	118 FPS
high	157 FPS	96 FPS
ultra	139 FPS	79 FPS
4K
low	164 FPS	73 FPS
medium	136 FPS	67 FPS
high	105 FPS	53 FPS
ultra	92 FPS	41 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 7840S Open Xeon W-2175

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 7 7840S	Xeon W-2175
1080p
low	509 FPS	430 FPS
medium	419 FPS	380 FPS
high	361 FPS	329 FPS
ultra	322 FPS	298 FPS
1440p
low	445 FPS	378 FPS
medium	386 FPS	339 FPS
high	332 FPS	294 FPS
ultra	283 FPS	257 FPS
4K
low	293 FPS	245 FPS
medium	266 FPS	219 FPS
high	251 FPS	204 FPS
ultra	216 FPS	178 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 7840S Open Xeon W-2175

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 7 7840S	Xeon W-2175
1080p
low	582 FPS	588 FPS
medium	582 FPS	588 FPS
high	582 FPS	588 FPS
ultra	546 FPS	588 FPS
1440p
low	582 FPS	588 FPS
medium	582 FPS	588 FPS
high	541 FPS	588 FPS
ultra	464 FPS	567 FPS
4K
low	541 FPS	511 FPS
medium	473 FPS	426 FPS
high	419 FPS	383 FPS
ultra	355 FPS	317 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 7840S Open Xeon W-2175

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 7 7840S	Xeon W-2175
1080p
low	582 FPS	588 FPS
medium	582 FPS	588 FPS
high	582 FPS	588 FPS
ultra	582 FPS	588 FPS
1440p
low	582 FPS	588 FPS
medium	582 FPS	588 FPS
high	582 FPS	588 FPS
ultra	573 FPS	557 FPS
4K
low	572 FPS	588 FPS
medium	511 FPS	554 FPS
high	457 FPS	485 FPS
ultra	394 FPS	410 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 7840S Open Xeon W-2175

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 7840S and Xeon W-2175

Ryzen 7 7840S

The Ryzen 7 7840S is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP7r2/FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 8 MB + 16 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 23,290 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon W-2175

The Xeon W-2175 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 October 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 19.25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400, DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 23,507 points. Launch price was $1,947.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 7 7840S packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon W-2175 offers 14 cores / 28 threads — the Xeon W-2175 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7840S versus 4.3 GHz on the Xeon W-2175 — a 17% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 7840S (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Ryzen 7 7840S uses the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon W-2175 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 7840S scores 23,290 against the Xeon W-2175's 23,507 — a 0.9% lead for the Xeon W-2175. L3 cache: 16 MB on the Ryzen 7 7840S vs 19.25 MB (total) on the Xeon W-2175.

Feature	Ryzen 7 7840S	Xeon W-2175
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	14 / 28+75%
Boost Clock	5.1 GHz+19%	4.3 GHz
Base Clock	3.8 GHz+52%	2.5 GHz
L3 Cache	16 MB	19.25 MB (total)+20%
L2 Cache	8 MB+700%	1 MB (per core)
Process	4 nm-71%	14 nm
Architecture	Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023)	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	23,290	23,507
Cinebench R23 Multi	13,500	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,570	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	13,535	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 7840S uses the FP7/FP7r2/FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-2175 uses LGA2066 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Ryzen 7 7840S	Xeon W-2175
Socket	FP7/FP7r2/FP8	LGA2066
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600, LPDDR5x-7500	—
Max RAM Capacity	256 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	20	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (SVM) (Ryzen 7 7840S) / not specified (Xeon W-2175). The Ryzen 7 7840S includes integrated graphics (Radeon 780M), while the Xeon W-2175 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 7840S targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 7840S rivals Core i7-1360P.