PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 7 7840S

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 8W instead of 180W, a 172W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP7/FP7r2/FP8 with DDR5 support instead of SP3r2 and DDR4.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 780M, while Ryzen Threadripper 1920X needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X

2017

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7840S across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (23,150 vs 23,290).
❌Launch MSRP is still $799 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 7840S mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌2150% higher power demand at 180W vs 8W.
❌Older platform position on SP3r2 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 7840S moves to FP7/FP7r2/FP8 and DDR5.

Ryzen 7 7840S

2023

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 8W instead of 180W, a 172W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP7/FP7r2/FP8 with DDR5 support instead of SP3r2 and DDR4.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 780M, while Ryzen Threadripper 1920X needs a discrete GPU.

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7840S across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (23,150 vs 23,290).
❌Launch MSRP is still $799 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 7840S mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌2150% higher power demand at 180W vs 8W.
❌Older platform position on SP3r2 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 7840S moves to FP7/FP7r2/FP8 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 7840S better than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Ryzen Threadripper 1920X makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 7840S is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 7 7840S is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 7.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 7840S is the better fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 7840S is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen Threadripper 1920X makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Ryzen 7 7840S is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $799 MSRP, and it gives you a 7.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (29.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 7840S is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2017), a healthier platform with FP7/FP7r2/FP8 and DDR5 instead of SP3r2, more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 12/24, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 7 7840S Benchmark Check

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 7 7840S	Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
1080p
low	269 FPS	192 FPS
medium	243 FPS	168 FPS
high	204 FPS	138 FPS
ultra	176 FPS	111 FPS
1440p
low	236 FPS	154 FPS
medium	193 FPS	128 FPS
high	157 FPS	102 FPS
ultra	139 FPS	81 FPS
4K
low	164 FPS	68 FPS
medium	136 FPS	60 FPS
high	105 FPS	47 FPS
ultra	92 FPS	38 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 7840S Open Ryzen Threadripper 1920X

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 7 7840S	Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
1080p
low	510 FPS	463 FPS
medium	419 FPS	414 FPS
high	361 FPS	358 FPS
ultra	322 FPS	319 FPS
1440p
low	446 FPS	404 FPS
medium	386 FPS	365 FPS
high	332 FPS	317 FPS
ultra	283 FPS	274 FPS
4K
low	294 FPS	260 FPS
medium	266 FPS	233 FPS
high	251 FPS	218 FPS
ultra	216 FPS	190 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 7840S Open Ryzen Threadripper 1920X

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 7 7840S	Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
1080p
low	582 FPS	579 FPS
medium	582 FPS	579 FPS
high	582 FPS	556 FPS
ultra	546 FPS	489 FPS
1440p
low	582 FPS	579 FPS
medium	582 FPS	516 FPS
high	541 FPS	453 FPS
ultra	464 FPS	395 FPS
4K
low	541 FPS	455 FPS
medium	473 FPS	365 FPS
high	419 FPS	327 FPS
ultra	355 FPS	271 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 7840S Open Ryzen Threadripper 1920X

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 7 7840S	Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
1080p
low	582 FPS	579 FPS
medium	582 FPS	579 FPS
high	582 FPS	579 FPS
ultra	582 FPS	579 FPS
1440p
low	582 FPS	579 FPS
medium	582 FPS	579 FPS
high	582 FPS	527 FPS
ultra	573 FPS	453 FPS
4K
low	572 FPS	475 FPS
medium	511 FPS	436 FPS
high	457 FPS	392 FPS
ultra	394 FPS	338 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 7840S Open Ryzen Threadripper 1920X

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 7840S and Ryzen Threadripper 1920X

Ryzen 7 7840S

The Ryzen 7 7840S is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP7r2/FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 8 MB + 16 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 23,290 points. Launch price was $299.

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X

The Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 23,150 points. Launch price was $799.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 7 7840S packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7840S versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X — a 19.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 7840S (base: 3.8 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Ryzen 7 7840S uses the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 7840S scores 23,290 against the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X's 23,150 — a 0.6% lead for the Ryzen 7 7840S. L3 cache: 16 MB on the Ryzen 7 7840S vs 32 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.

Feature	Ryzen 7 7840S	Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	12 / 24+50%
Boost Clock	5.1 GHz+21%	4.2 GHz
Base Clock	3.8 GHz+9%	3.5 GHz
L3 Cache	16 MB	32 MB+100%
L2 Cache	8 MB+1500%	512K (per core)
Process	4 nm-71%	14 nm
Architecture	Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023)	Zen (2017−2020)
PassMark	23,290	23,150
Cinebench R23 Multi	13,500	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,570	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	13,535	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 7840S uses the FP7/FP7r2/FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X uses SP3r2 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Ryzen 7 7840S	Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Socket	FP7/FP7r2/FP8	SP3r2
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600, LPDDR5x-7500	—
Max RAM Capacity	256 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	20	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (SVM) (Ryzen 7 7840S) / not specified (Ryzen Threadripper 1920X). The Ryzen 7 7840S includes integrated graphics (Radeon 780M), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 7840S targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 7840S rivals Core i7-1360P.