PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 5 5600X

2020

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7840HS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (21,845 vs 28,538).
❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 7840HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 7840HS moves to FP8 and DDR5.

Ryzen 7 7840HS

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +31.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 780M, while Ryzen 5 5600X needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).

Ryzen 5 5600X

2020

Ryzen 7 7840HS

2023

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +31.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 780M, while Ryzen 5 5600X needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7840HS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (21,845 vs 28,538).
❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 7840HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 7840HS moves to FP8 and DDR5.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 7840HS better than Ryzen 5 5600X?

Yes. Ryzen 7 7840HS is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 31.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 30.6% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 7 7840HS is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 31.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 7840HS is the better fit. You are getting 30.6% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 7840HS is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen 5 5600X makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Ryzen 7 7840HS is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $299 MSRP, and it gives you a 31.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 5 5600X is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (73.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 7840HS is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2020), a healthier platform with FP8 and DDR5 instead of AM4, and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 6/12. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 5 5600X Benchmark Check

Ryzen 7 7840HS Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 5 5600X	Ryzen 7 7840HS
1080p
low	203 FPS	267 FPS
medium	174 FPS	242 FPS
high	140 FPS	203 FPS
ultra	107 FPS	176 FPS
1440p
low	169 FPS	235 FPS
medium	141 FPS	193 FPS
high	113 FPS	157 FPS
ultra	86 FPS	139 FPS
4K
low	85 FPS	163 FPS
medium	76 FPS	136 FPS
high	60 FPS	105 FPS
ultra	47 FPS	92 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 5600X Open Ryzen 7 7840HS

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 5 5600X	Ryzen 7 7840HS
1080p
low	464 FPS	495 FPS
medium	387 FPS	406 FPS
high	324 FPS	347 FPS
ultra	291 FPS	309 FPS
1440p
low	397 FPS	432 FPS
medium	334 FPS	374 FPS
high	290 FPS	320 FPS
ultra	253 FPS	272 FPS
4K
low	263 FPS	285 FPS
medium	226 FPS	258 FPS
high	205 FPS	242 FPS
ultra	171 FPS	208 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 5600X Open Ryzen 7 7840HS

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 5 5600X	Ryzen 7 7840HS
1080p
low	546 FPS	713 FPS
medium	473 FPS	713 FPS
high	432 FPS	713 FPS
ultra	358 FPS	624 FPS
1440p
low	508 FPS	713 FPS
medium	413 FPS	646 FPS
high	375 FPS	545 FPS
ultra	312 FPS	467 FPS
4K
low	348 FPS	544 FPS
medium	292 FPS	475 FPS
high	255 FPS	422 FPS
ultra	199 FPS	357 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 5600X Open Ryzen 7 7840HS

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 5 5600X	Ryzen 7 7840HS
1080p
low	546 FPS	713 FPS
medium	546 FPS	713 FPS
high	546 FPS	713 FPS
ultra	546 FPS	713 FPS
1440p
low	546 FPS	713 FPS
medium	546 FPS	713 FPS
high	546 FPS	658 FPS
ultra	524 FPS	573 FPS
4K
low	529 FPS	574 FPS
medium	484 FPS	511 FPS
high	435 FPS	456 FPS
ultra	379 FPS	394 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 5600X Open Ryzen 7 7840HS

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 5600X and Ryzen 7 7840HS

Ryzen 5 5600X

The Ryzen 5 5600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 21,845 points. Launch price was $299.

Ryzen 7 7840HS

The Ryzen 7 7840HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 28,538 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 5600X packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 7 7840HS offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 7840HS has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600X versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7840HS — a 10.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 7840HS (base: 3.7 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Ryzen 5 5600X uses the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Ryzen 7 7840HS uses Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 5600X scores 21,845 against the Ryzen 7 7840HS's 28,538 — a 26.6% lead for the Ryzen 7 7840HS. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 5 5600X vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 7840HS.

Feature	Ryzen 5 5600X	Ryzen 7 7840HS
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	8 / 16+33%
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz	5.1 GHz+11%
Base Clock	3.7 GHz	3.8 GHz+3%
L3 Cache	32 MB+100%	16 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	1 MB (per core)+100%
Process	7 nm, 12 nm	4 nm-43%
Architecture	Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022)	Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023)
PassMark	21,845	28,538+31%
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	16,854
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,962
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	11,898

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 5600X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 7840HS uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 5600X versus LPDDR5-7500 / DDR5-5600 on the Ryzen 7 7840HS — the Ryzen 7 7840HS supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 7 7840HS supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 5 5600X) vs 20 (Ryzen 7 7840HS) — the Ryzen 5 5600X offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 5 5600X) and FP7,FP7r2,FP8 (Ryzen 7 7840HS).

Feature	Ryzen 5 5600X	Ryzen 7 7840HS
Socket	AM4	FP8
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	LPDDR5-7500 / DDR5-5600+25%
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	256 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	24+20%	20

🔧

Advanced Features

Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Ryzen 7 7840HS supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5600X) vs AMD-V, SVM (Ryzen 7 7840HS). The Ryzen 7 7840HS includes integrated graphics (Radeon 780M), while the Ryzen 5 5600X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 5600X targets Desktop, Ryzen 7 7840HS targets High-performance Laptop / Mini-PC. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 7840HS rivals Core i7-13700H.