Core i9-12900E vs Ryzen 7 7840H

Intel

Core i9-12900E

16 Cores24 Thrd65 WWMax: 5 GHz2022

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen 7 7840H

8 Cores16 Thrd35 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2023

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i9-12900E

2022

Why buy it

  • +1.2% higher PassMark.
  • +87.5% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 16 MB).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while Ryzen 7 7840H needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7840H across 46 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Launch MSRP is still $500 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 7840H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.

Ryzen 7 7840H

2023

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +9.3% higher average FPS across 46 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (27,832 vs 28,170).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 30 MB).
  • No integrated graphics, while Core i9-12900E can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 7840H better than Core i9-12900E?
It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Ryzen 7 7840H is ahead with a 9.3% average FPS lead across 46 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i9-12900E pulls ahead with 1.2% better PassMark. Core i9-12900E also has the bigger cache pool with 87.5% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 16 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i9-12900E is the better fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 24 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 87.5% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 16 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 7 7840H is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i9-12900E makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Ryzen 7 7840H is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $500 MSRP, and it gives you a 9.3% average FPS lead across 46 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that Core i9-12900E is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 1.2% better PassMark. Core i9-12900E is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (56.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 7 7840H is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2022). That makes it the safer long-term pick.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore i9-12900ERyzen 7 7840H
1080p
low254 FPS268 FPS
medium239 FPS241 FPS
high201 FPS206 FPS
ultra172 FPS176 FPS
1440p
low220 FPS234 FPS
medium187 FPS191 FPS
high153 FPS158 FPS
ultra135 FPS138 FPS
4K
low151 FPS160 FPS
medium128 FPS132 FPS
high100 FPS102 FPS
ultra87 FPS89 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore i9-12900ERyzen 7 7840H
1080p
low646 FPS499 FPS
medium552 FPS415 FPS
high462 FPS358 FPS
ultra410 FPS318 FPS
1440p
low557 FPS437 FPS
medium497 FPS383 FPS
high419 FPS331 FPS
ultra351 FPS280 FPS
4K
low330 FPS290 FPS
medium299 FPS265 FPS
high282 FPS250 FPS
ultra240 FPS215 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore i9-12900ERyzen 7 7840H
1080p
low704 FPS696 FPS
medium704 FPS696 FPS
high704 FPS696 FPS
ultra704 FPS650 FPS
1440p
low704 FPS696 FPS
medium704 FPS637 FPS
high704 FPS548 FPS
ultra656 FPS464 FPS
4K
low596 FPS534 FPS
medium502 FPS460 FPS
high447 FPS409 FPS
ultra376 FPS344 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore i9-12900ERyzen 7 7840H
1080p
low704 FPS696 FPS
medium704 FPS696 FPS
high704 FPS696 FPS
ultra704 FPS696 FPS
1440p
low704 FPS696 FPS
medium704 FPS696 FPS
high696 FPS696 FPS
ultra591 FPS631 FPS
4K
low659 FPS619 FPS
medium584 FPS553 FPS
high513 FPS496 FPS
ultra435 FPS434 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-12900E and Ryzen 7 7840H

Intel

Core i9-12900E

The Core i9-12900E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 28,170 points. Launch price was $299.

AMD

Ryzen 7 7840H

The Ryzen 7 7840H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600. Passmark benchmark score: 27,832 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The Core i9-12900E packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the Ryzen 7 7840H offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i9-12900E has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i9-12900E versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7840H — a 2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 7840H (base: 2.3 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core i9-12900E uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen 7 7840H uses Phoenix (2023−2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-12900E scores 28,170 against the Ryzen 7 7840H's 27,832 — a 1.2% lead for the Core i9-12900E. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i9-12900E vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 7840H.

FeatureCore i9-12900ERyzen 7 7840H
Cores / Threads
16 / 24+100%
8 / 16
Boost Clock
5 GHz
5.1 GHz+2%
Base Clock
2.3 GHz
3.8 GHz+65%
L3 Cache
30 MB (total)+88%
16 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)+25%
1 MB (per core)
Process
10 nm
4 nm-60%
Architecture
Alder Lake-S (2022)
Phoenix (2023−2024)
PassMark
28,170+1%
27,832
Cinebench R23 Multi
13,420
Geekbench 6 Multi
13,107
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-12900E uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 7840H uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i9-12900ERyzen 7 7840H
Socket
LGA1700
FP8
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+25%
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
Yes
PCIe Lanes
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-12900E) / not specified (Ryzen 7 7840H). The Core i9-12900E includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), while the Ryzen 7 7840H requires a dedicated GPU.

FeatureCore i9-12900ERyzen 7 7840H
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics 770
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d