
EPYC 9845
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 9845
2024Why buy it
- ✅+346.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅+233.3% larger total L3 cache (320 MB vs 96 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 160 cores / 320 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 28.
- ✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7800X3D across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.3 vs 76.4 PassMark/$ ($13,564 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ❌225% higher power demand at 390W vs 120W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 7800X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +80.1% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $13,115 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $13,564 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 577.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 76.4 vs 11.3 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $13,564 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 390W, a 270W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core), while EPYC 9845 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (34,293 vs 152,985).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (96 MB vs 320 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9845, which brings 160 cores / 320 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
EPYC 9845
2024Ryzen 7 7800X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅+346.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅+233.3% larger total L3 cache (320 MB vs 96 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 160 cores / 320 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 28.
- ✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +80.1% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $13,115 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $13,564 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 577.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 76.4 vs 11.3 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $13,564 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 390W, a 270W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core), while EPYC 9845 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7800X3D across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.3 vs 76.4 PassMark/$ ($13,564 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ❌225% higher power demand at 390W vs 120W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 7800X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (34,293 vs 152,985).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (96 MB vs 320 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9845, which brings 160 cores / 320 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 9845 better than Ryzen 7 7800X3D?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 9845 | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 266 FPS |
| medium | 156 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 126 FPS | 211 FPS |
| ultra | 98 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 258 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 215 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 154 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 72 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 100 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 9845 | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 274 FPS | 857 FPS |
| medium | 241 FPS | 737 FPS |
| high | 198 FPS | 580 FPS |
| ultra | 163 FPS | 493 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 225 FPS | 722 FPS |
| medium | 202 FPS | 611 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 500 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 398 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 139 FPS | 396 FPS |
| medium | 128 FPS | 339 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 315 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 273 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 9845 | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 743 FPS | 857 FPS |
| medium | 610 FPS | 857 FPS |
| high | 556 FPS | 857 FPS |
| ultra | 481 FPS | 857 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 594 FPS | 857 FPS |
| medium | 494 FPS | 851 FPS |
| high | 450 FPS | 786 FPS |
| ultra | 390 FPS | 656 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 430 FPS | 558 FPS |
| medium | 335 FPS | 479 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 427 FPS |
| ultra | 240 FPS | 362 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 9845 | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 958 FPS | 857 FPS |
| medium | 869 FPS | 857 FPS |
| high | 746 FPS | 857 FPS |
| ultra | 646 FPS | 782 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 739 FPS | 857 FPS |
| medium | 646 FPS | 760 FPS |
| high | 552 FPS | 669 FPS |
| ultra | 473 FPS | 576 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 618 FPS |
| medium | 474 FPS | 556 FPS |
| high | 415 FPS | 495 FPS |
| ultra | 358 FPS | 428 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9845 and Ryzen 7 7800X3D

EPYC 9845
EPYC 9845
The EPYC 9845 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 160 cores and 320 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 320 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 390 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 152,985 points. Launch price was $13,564.


Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 96 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 34,293 points. Launch price was $449.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9845 packs 160 cores / 320 threads, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the EPYC 9845 has 152 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 9845 versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D — a 29.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D (base: 2.1 GHz vs 4.4 GHz). The EPYC 9845 uses the Turin (2024) architecture (3 nm), while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D uses Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9845 scores 152,985 against the Ryzen 7 7800X3D's 34,293 — a 126.8% lead for the EPYC 9845. L3 cache: 320 MB (total) on the EPYC 9845 vs 96 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D.
| Feature | EPYC 9845 | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 160 / 320+1900% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz | 5 GHz+35% |
| Base Clock | 2.1 GHz | 4.4 GHz+110% |
| L3 Cache | 320 MB (total)+233% | 96 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 3 nm-40% | 5 nm |
| Architecture | Turin (2024) | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 152,985+346% | 34,293 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 18,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,700 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 15,000 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9845 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-6000 memory speed. The Ryzen 7 7800X3D supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 6 TB — 182.1% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9845) vs 2 (Ryzen 7 7800X3D). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9845) vs 28 (Ryzen 7 7800X3D) — the EPYC 9845 offers 100 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9845) and X670E,X670,B650E,B650,A620 (Ryzen 7 7800X3D).
| Feature | EPYC 9845 | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6000 | DDR5-5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6 TB+4700% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 12+500% | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+357% | 28 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9845) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 7800X3D). The Ryzen 7 7800X3D includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core)), while the EPYC 9845 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 9845 targets Data Center / AI Training, Ryzen 7 7800X3D targets Gaming. Direct competitor: EPYC 9845 rivals Xeon 6972P; Ryzen 7 7800X3D rivals Intel Core i7-14700K.
| Feature | EPYC 9845 | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core) |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SEV-SNP | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Data Center / AI Training | Gaming |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 9845 launched at $13564 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D debuted at $449. On MSRP ($13564 vs $449), the Ryzen 7 7800X3D is $13115 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9845 delivers 11.3 pts/$ vs 76.4 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D — making the Ryzen 7 7800X3D the 148.5% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9845 | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $13564 | $449-97% |
| Performance per Dollar | 11.3 | 76.4+576% |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











