PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 7303P

2023

Why buy it

✅+6.4% higher PassMark.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 28.
✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7800X3D across 7 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 61.4 vs 76.4 PassMark/$ ($594 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 7800X3D moves to AM5 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 7800X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Ryzen 7 7800X3D

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +63.8% higher average FPS across 7 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $145 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $594 MSRP).
✅Delivers 24.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 76.4 vs 61.4 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $594 MSRP).
✅Draws 120W instead of 130W, a 10W reduction.
✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (34,293 vs 36,487).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7303P, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.

EPYC 7303P

2023

Ryzen 7 7800X3D

2023

Why buy it

✅+6.4% higher PassMark.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 28.
✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +63.8% higher average FPS across 7 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $145 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $594 MSRP).
✅Delivers 24.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 76.4 vs 61.4 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $594 MSRP).
✅Draws 120W instead of 130W, a 10W reduction.
✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7800X3D across 7 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 61.4 vs 76.4 PassMark/$ ($594 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 7800X3D moves to AM5 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 7800X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (34,293 vs 36,487).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7303P, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 7800X3D better than EPYC 7303P?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. EPYC 7303P makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 7800X3D is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7303P is the better fit. You are getting 6.4% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 7800X3D is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 7 7800X3D is $145 cheaper on MSRP at $449 MSRP versus $594 MSRP, and it gives you a 63.8% average FPS lead across 7 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that EPYC 7303P is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 6.4% better PassMark. It is also 24.3% better value on MSRP (76.4 vs 61.4 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 7800X3D is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a healthier platform with AM5 and DDR5 instead of SP3 and 3D V-Cache and a much larger 96 MB L3 cache instead of 64 MB. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 7303P Benchmark Check

Ryzen 7 7800X3D Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 7303P	Ryzen 7 7800X3D
1080p
low	159 FPS	266 FPS
medium	130 FPS	247 FPS
high	109 FPS	211 FPS
ultra	86 FPS	186 FPS
1440p
low	141 FPS	258 FPS
medium	113 FPS	215 FPS
high	89 FPS	171 FPS
ultra	71 FPS	154 FPS
4K
low	68 FPS	179 FPS
medium	57 FPS	149 FPS
high	45 FPS	112 FPS
ultra	37 FPS	100 FPS

Open EPYC 7303P Open Ryzen 7 7800X3D

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 7303P	Ryzen 7 7800X3D
1080p
low	390 FPS	857 FPS
medium	346 FPS	737 FPS
high	283 FPS	580 FPS
ultra	225 FPS	493 FPS
1440p
low	329 FPS	722 FPS
medium	297 FPS	611 FPS
high	251 FPS	500 FPS
ultra	192 FPS	398 FPS
4K
low	203 FPS	396 FPS
medium	186 FPS	339 FPS
high	158 FPS	315 FPS
ultra	127 FPS	273 FPS

Open EPYC 7303P Open Ryzen 7 7800X3D

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 7303P	Ryzen 7 7800X3D
1080p
low	644 FPS	857 FPS
medium	526 FPS	857 FPS
high	469 FPS	857 FPS
ultra	411 FPS	857 FPS
1440p
low	499 FPS	857 FPS
medium	406 FPS	851 FPS
high	356 FPS	786 FPS
ultra	310 FPS	656 FPS
4K
low	368 FPS	558 FPS
medium	286 FPS	479 FPS
high	244 FPS	427 FPS
ultra	197 FPS	362 FPS

Open EPYC 7303P Open Ryzen 7 7800X3D

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 7303P	Ryzen 7 7800X3D
1080p
low	885 FPS	857 FPS
medium	806 FPS	857 FPS
high	696 FPS	857 FPS
ultra	610 FPS	782 FPS
1440p
low	696 FPS	857 FPS
medium	608 FPS	760 FPS
high	521 FPS	669 FPS
ultra	446 FPS	576 FPS
4K
low	498 FPS	618 FPS
medium	445 FPS	556 FPS
high	390 FPS	495 FPS
ultra	337 FPS	428 FPS

Open EPYC 7303P Open Ryzen 7 7800X3D

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7303P and Ryzen 7 7800X3D

EPYC 7303P

The EPYC 7303P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 36,487 points. Launch price was $594.

Ryzen 7 7800X3D

The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 96 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 34,293 points. Launch price was $449.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7303P packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the EPYC 7303P has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the EPYC 7303P versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D — a 38.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D (base: 2.4 GHz vs 4.4 GHz). The EPYC 7303P uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D uses Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7303P scores 36,487 against the Ryzen 7 7800X3D's 34,293 — a 6.2% lead for the EPYC 7303P. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7303P vs 96 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D.

Feature	EPYC 7303P	Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Cores / Threads	16 / 32+100%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz	5 GHz+47%
Base Clock	2.4 GHz	4.4 GHz+83%
L3 Cache	64 MB (total)	96 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	1 MB (per core)+100%
Process	7 nm	5 nm-29%
Architecture	Milan (2021−2023)	Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023)
PassMark	36,487+6%	34,293
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	18,500
Geekbench 6 Single	—	2,700
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	15,000

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7303P uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7303P versus DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D — the EPYC 7303P supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7303P supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 128 GB — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7303P) vs 2 (Ryzen 7 7800X3D). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7303P) vs 28 (Ryzen 7 7800X3D) — the EPYC 7303P offers 100 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7303P) and X670E,X670,B650E,B650,A620 (Ryzen 7 7800X3D).

Feature	EPYC 7303P	Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Socket	SP3	AM5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	3200+63900%	DDR5-5200
Max RAM Capacity	4096	128 GB+3276700%
RAM Channels	8+300%	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+357%	28

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 7 7800X3D has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V, IOMMU (EPYC 7303P) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 7800X3D). The Ryzen 7 7800X3D includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core)), while the EPYC 7303P requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 7800X3D targets Gaming. Direct competitor: EPYC 7303P rivals Xeon Gold 6330; Ryzen 7 7800X3D rivals Intel Core i7-14700K.

Feature	EPYC 7303P	Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	None	AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core)
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V, IOMMU	AMD-V
Target Use	—	Gaming

💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 7303P launched at $594 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D debuted at $449. On MSRP ($594 vs $449), the Ryzen 7 7800X3D is $145 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7303P delivers 61.4 pts/$ vs 76.4 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D — making the Ryzen 7 7800X3D the 21.7% better value option.