EPYC 7303P vs Xeon Gold 6330N

AMD

EPYC 7303P

16 Cores32 Thrd130 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2023

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Xeon Gold 6330N

28 Cores56 Thrd165 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2021

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 7303P

2023

Why buy it

  • +0.3% higher PassMark.
  • +52.4% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 42 MB).
  • Costs $1,795 less on MSRP ($594 MSRP vs $2,389 MSRP).
  • Delivers 303.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 61.4 vs 15.2 PassMark/$ ($594 MSRP vs $2,389 MSRP).
  • Draws 130W instead of 165W, a 35W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Xeon Gold 6330N

2021

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Lower PassMark (36,360 vs 36,487).
    • Smaller total L3 cache (42 MB vs 64 MB).
    • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.2 vs 61.4 PassMark/$ ($2,389 MSRP vs $594 MSRP).
    • 26.9% higher power demand at 165W vs 130W.

    Quick Answers

    So, is EPYC 7303P better than Xeon Gold 6330N?
    Yes. EPYC 7303P is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 2.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    For gaming, the two CPUs are effectively a wash in the available data.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7303P is the better fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 52.4% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 42 MB).
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    EPYC 7303P is the smarter buy today. EPYC 7303P is $1,795 cheaper on MSRP at $594 MSRP versus $2,389 MSRP, and it gives you a 2.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 303.6% better value on MSRP (61.4 vs 15.2 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    EPYC 7303P is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2021), 52.4% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 42 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 28/56. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

    Games Benchmarks

    Paired with RTX 4090

    To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

    Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

    Path of Exile 2

    Path of Exile 2

    PresetEPYC 7303PXeon Gold 6330N
    1080p
    low159 FPS189 FPS
    medium130 FPS152 FPS
    high109 FPS122 FPS
    ultra86 FPS95 FPS
    1440p
    low141 FPS154 FPS
    medium113 FPS120 FPS
    high89 FPS92 FPS
    ultra71 FPS74 FPS
    4K
    low68 FPS72 FPS
    medium57 FPS60 FPS
    high45 FPS46 FPS
    ultra37 FPS38 FPS
    Counter-Strike 2

    Counter-Strike 2

    PresetEPYC 7303PXeon Gold 6330N
    1080p
    low390 FPS233 FPS
    medium346 FPS208 FPS
    high283 FPS173 FPS
    ultra225 FPS139 FPS
    1440p
    low329 FPS199 FPS
    medium297 FPS181 FPS
    high251 FPS154 FPS
    ultra192 FPS119 FPS
    4K
    low203 FPS124 FPS
    medium186 FPS115 FPS
    high158 FPS101 FPS
    ultra127 FPS82 FPS
    League of Legends

    League of Legends

    PresetEPYC 7303PXeon Gold 6330N
    1080p
    low644 FPS909 FPS
    medium526 FPS817 FPS
    high469 FPS766 FPS
    ultra411 FPS680 FPS
    1440p
    low499 FPS747 FPS
    medium406 FPS644 FPS
    high356 FPS604 FPS
    ultra310 FPS536 FPS
    4K
    low368 FPS480 FPS
    medium286 FPS379 FPS
    high244 FPS334 FPS
    ultra197 FPS273 FPS
    Valorant

    Valorant

    PresetEPYC 7303PXeon Gold 6330N
    1080p
    low885 FPS895 FPS
    medium806 FPS813 FPS
    high696 FPS698 FPS
    ultra610 FPS600 FPS
    1440p
    low696 FPS698 FPS
    medium608 FPS613 FPS
    high521 FPS524 FPS
    ultra446 FPS448 FPS
    4K
    low498 FPS503 FPS
    medium445 FPS450 FPS
    high390 FPS394 FPS
    ultra337 FPS343 FPS

    Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7303P and Xeon Gold 6330N

    AMD

    EPYC 7303P

    The EPYC 7303P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 36,487 points. Launch price was $594.

    Intel

    Xeon Gold 6330N

    The Xeon Gold 6330N is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 42 MB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2667. Passmark benchmark score: 36,360 points. Launch price was $800.

    Processing Power

    The EPYC 7303P packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6330N offers 28 cores / 56 threads — the Xeon Gold 6330N has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the EPYC 7303P versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6330N — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The EPYC 7303P is built on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. In PassMark, the EPYC 7303P scores 36,487 against the Xeon Gold 6330N's 36,360 — a 0.3% lead for the EPYC 7303P. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7303P vs 42 MB on the Xeon Gold 6330N.

    FeatureEPYC 7303PXeon Gold 6330N
    Cores / Threads
    16 / 32
    28 / 56+75%
    Boost Clock
    3.4 GHz
    3.4 GHz
    Base Clock
    2.4 GHz+9%
    2.2 GHz
    L3 Cache
    64 MB (total)+52%
    42 MB
    L2 Cache
    512 kB (per core)
    Process
    7 nm-30%
    10 nm
    Architecture
    Milan (2021−2023)
    PassMark
    36,487
    36,360
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The EPYC 7303P uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6330N uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7303P versus 2667 on the Xeon Gold 6330N — the EPYC 7303P supports 18.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 6330N supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 4096 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7303P) vs 64 (Xeon Gold 6330N) — the EPYC 7303P offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7303P) and C621A (Xeon Gold 6330N).

    FeatureEPYC 7303PXeon Gold 6330N
    Socket
    SP3
    LGA4189
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 4.0
    PCIe 4.0
    Max RAM Speed
    3200+20%
    2667
    Max RAM Capacity
    4096
    6144+50%
    RAM Channels
    8
    8
    ECC Support
    Yes
    Yes
    PCIe Lanes
    128+100%
    64
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V, IOMMU (EPYC 7303P) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 6330N). Direct competitor: EPYC 7303P rivals Xeon Gold 6330; Xeon Gold 6330N rivals EPYC 7413.

    FeatureEPYC 7303PXeon Gold 6330N
    Integrated GPU
    No
    No
    IGPU Model
    None
    None
    Unlocked
    No
    No
    AVX-512
    Yes
    Yes
    Virtualization
    AMD-V, IOMMU
    VT-x, VT-d
    💰

    Value Analysis

    The EPYC 7303P launched at $594 MSRP, while the Xeon Gold 6330N debuted at $2389. On MSRP ($594 vs $2389), the EPYC 7303P is $1795 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7303P delivers 61.4 pts/$ vs 15.2 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6330N — making the EPYC 7303P the 120.6% better value option.

    FeatureEPYC 7303PXeon Gold 6330N
    MSRP
    $594-75%
    $2389
    Performance per Dollar
    61.4+304%
    15.2
    Release Date
    2023
    2021