
Core i5-12400F
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 7735H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-12400F
2022Why buy it
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 7 7735H.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,532 vs 23,619).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $174 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 7735H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 7735H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 7 7735H
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 680M, while Core i5-12400F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Core i5-12400F
2022Ryzen 7 7735H
2023Why buy it
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 7 7735H.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 680M, while Core i5-12400F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,532 vs 23,619).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $174 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 7735H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 7735H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 7735H better than Core i5-12400F?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen 7 7735H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 246 FPS |
| medium | 168 FPS | 230 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 192 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 165 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 217 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 184 FPS |
| high | 106 FPS | 149 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 131 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 152 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 129 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 87 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen 7 7735H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 471 FPS | 414 FPS |
| medium | 397 FPS | 350 FPS |
| high | 341 FPS | 306 FPS |
| ultra | 301 FPS | 272 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 407 FPS | 357 FPS |
| medium | 351 FPS | 312 FPS |
| high | 309 FPS | 277 FPS |
| ultra | 265 FPS | 238 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 282 FPS | 246 FPS |
| medium | 248 FPS | 221 FPS |
| high | 229 FPS | 207 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 179 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen 7 7735H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 590 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 558 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 480 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 387 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 590 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 505 FPS |
| high | 485 FPS | 432 FPS |
| ultra | 434 FPS | 354 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 430 FPS |
| medium | 389 FPS | 366 FPS |
| high | 337 FPS | 321 FPS |
| ultra | 274 FPS | 261 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen 7 7735H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 590 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 590 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 590 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 590 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 590 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 590 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 587 FPS |
| ultra | 473 FPS | 510 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 535 FPS |
| medium | 450 FPS | 488 FPS |
| high | 391 FPS | 435 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 376 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-12400F and Ryzen 7 7735H

Core i5-12400F
Core i5-12400F
The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.


Ryzen 7 7735H
Ryzen 7 7735H
The Ryzen 7 7735H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 April 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-H Refresh (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.75 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 23,619 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i5-12400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 7 7735H offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 7735H has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F versus 4.75 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7735H — a 7.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 7735H (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i5-12400F uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 7 7735H uses Rembrandt-H Refresh (2023) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12400F scores 19,532 against the Ryzen 7 7735H's 23,619 — a 18.9% lead for the Ryzen 7 7735H. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 7735H.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen 7 7735H |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 4.75 GHz+8% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.2 GHz+28% |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total)+13% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+150% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 6 nm-14% |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-S (2022) | Rembrandt-H Refresh (2023) |
| PassMark | 19,532 | 23,619+21% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 12,380 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,700 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 657 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-12400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 7735H uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Core i5-12400F supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen 7 7735H |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FP7 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | DDR5-4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+100% | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 7735H). The Ryzen 7 7735H includes integrated graphics (Radeon 680M), while the Core i5-12400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value, Ryzen 7 7735H targets Mobile. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen 7 7735H |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon 680M |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Gaming Performance/Value | Mobile |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











