Core i9-7920X vs Ryzen 7 7735H

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i9-7920X

2017

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7735H across 46 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (23,508 vs 23,619).
❌Launch MSRP is still $1,199 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 7735H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌300% higher power demand at 140W vs 35W.
❌Older platform position on LGA2066 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 7735H moves to FP7 and DDR5.

Ryzen 7 7735H

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.2% higher average FPS across 46 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 35W instead of 140W, a 105W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2066 and DDR4.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 680M, while Core i9-7920X needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Core i9-7920X

2017

Ryzen 7 7735H

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.2% higher average FPS across 46 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 35W instead of 140W, a 105W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2066 and DDR4.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 680M, while Core i9-7920X needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7735H across 46 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (23,508 vs 23,619).
❌Launch MSRP is still $1,199 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 7735H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌300% higher power demand at 140W vs 35W.
❌Older platform position on LGA2066 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 7735H moves to FP7 and DDR5.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 7735H better than Core i9-7920X?

Yes. Ryzen 7 7735H is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 7.2% average FPS lead across 46 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.5% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 7 7735H is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 7.2% more average FPS across 46 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 7735H is the better fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 7735H is the smarter buy by a wide margin for a fresh build. Ryzen 7 7735H is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $1,199 MSRP, and it gives you a 7.2% average FPS lead across 46 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i9-7920X only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that is mostly used-market pricing on an obsolete 2017 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (19.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a very cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA2066.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 7735H is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2017), a healthier platform with FP7 and DDR5 instead of LGA2066, and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 12/24. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i9-7920X Benchmark Check

Ryzen 7 7735H Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i9-7920X	Ryzen 7 7735H
1080p
low	163 FPS	246 FPS
medium	142 FPS	230 FPS
high	113 FPS	192 FPS
ultra	96 FPS	165 FPS
1440p
low	140 FPS	217 FPS
medium	119 FPS	184 FPS
high	94 FPS	149 FPS
ultra	79 FPS	131 FPS
4K
low	76 FPS	152 FPS
medium	70 FPS	129 FPS
high	55 FPS	99 FPS
ultra	43 FPS	87 FPS

Open Core i9-7920X Open Ryzen 7 7735H

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i9-7920X	Ryzen 7 7735H
1080p
low	352 FPS	414 FPS
medium	300 FPS	350 FPS
high	274 FPS	306 FPS
ultra	243 FPS	272 FPS
1440p
low	315 FPS	357 FPS
medium	274 FPS	312 FPS
high	249 FPS	277 FPS
ultra	215 FPS	238 FPS
4K
low	227 FPS	246 FPS
medium	201 FPS	221 FPS
high	191 FPS	207 FPS
ultra	162 FPS	179 FPS

Open Core i9-7920X Open Ryzen 7 7735H

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i9-7920X	Ryzen 7 7735H
1080p
low	560 FPS	590 FPS
medium	468 FPS	558 FPS
high	420 FPS	480 FPS
ultra	366 FPS	387 FPS
1440p
low	507 FPS	590 FPS
medium	431 FPS	505 FPS
high	385 FPS	432 FPS
ultra	334 FPS	354 FPS
4K
low	390 FPS	430 FPS
medium	322 FPS	366 FPS
high	284 FPS	321 FPS
ultra	231 FPS	261 FPS

Open Core i9-7920X Open Ryzen 7 7735H

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i9-7920X	Ryzen 7 7735H
1080p
low	588 FPS	590 FPS
medium	588 FPS	590 FPS
high	588 FPS	590 FPS
ultra	588 FPS	590 FPS
1440p
low	588 FPS	590 FPS
medium	588 FPS	590 FPS
high	579 FPS	587 FPS
ultra	502 FPS	510 FPS
4K
low	531 FPS	535 FPS
medium	480 FPS	488 FPS
high	424 FPS	435 FPS
ultra	366 FPS	376 FPS

Open Core i9-7920X Open Ryzen 7 7735H

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-7920X and Ryzen 7 7735H

Core i9-7920X

The Core i9-7920X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 September 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 16.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 23,508 points. Launch price was $1,199.

Ryzen 7 7735H

The Ryzen 7 7735H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 April 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-H Refresh (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.75 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 23,619 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i9-7920X packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Ryzen 7 7735H offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i9-7920X has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i9-7920X versus 4.75 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7735H — a 7.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 7735H (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i9-7920X uses the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 7735H uses Rembrandt-H Refresh (2023) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-7920X scores 23,508 against the Ryzen 7 7735H's 23,619 — a 0.5% lead for the Ryzen 7 7735H. L3 cache: 16.5 MB (total) on the Core i9-7920X vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 7735H.

Feature	Core i9-7920X	Ryzen 7 7735H
Cores / Threads	12 / 24+50%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz	4.75 GHz+8%
Base Clock	2.9 GHz	3.2 GHz+10%
L3 Cache	16.5 MB (total)+3%	16 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)+100%	512 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm	6 nm-57%
Architecture	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)	Rembrandt-H Refresh (2023)
PassMark	23,508	23,619

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-7920X uses the LGA2066 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 7735H uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i9-7920X	Ryzen 7 7735H
Socket	LGA2066	FP7
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity	—	64 GB
RAM Channels	—	2
ECC Support	—	No
PCIe Lanes	—	20

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core i9-7920X) / AMD-V (Ryzen 7 7735H). The Ryzen 7 7735H includes integrated graphics (Radeon 680M), while the Core i9-7920X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 7735H targets Mobile.