
Ryzen 7 7730U
Popular choices:

Xeon E5-2687W v4
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 7730U
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.3% higher average FPS across 42 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 160W, a 145W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 30 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2687W v4, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.
Xeon E5-2687W v4
2016Why buy it
- ✅+87.5% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 0.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7730U across 42 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (17,640 vs 17,748).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $2,141 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 7730U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌966.7% higher power demand at 160W vs 15W.
Ryzen 7 7730U
2023Xeon E5-2687W v4
2016Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.3% higher average FPS across 42 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 160W, a 145W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+87.5% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 0.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 30 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2687W v4, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7730U across 42 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (17,640 vs 17,748).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $2,141 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 7730U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌966.7% higher power demand at 160W vs 15W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 7730U better than Xeon E5-2687W v4?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 7730U | Xeon E5-2687W v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 169 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 146 FPS | 141 FPS |
| high | 116 FPS | 114 FPS |
| ultra | 98 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 146 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 63 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 7730U | Xeon E5-2687W v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 223 FPS | 326 FPS |
| medium | 190 FPS | 295 FPS |
| high | 167 FPS | 255 FPS |
| ultra | 148 FPS | 210 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 282 FPS |
| medium | 170 FPS | 258 FPS |
| high | 152 FPS | 224 FPS |
| ultra | 130 FPS | 183 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 132 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 167 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 145 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 115 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 7730U | Xeon E5-2687W v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 444 FPS | 441 FPS |
| medium | 444 FPS | 441 FPS |
| high | 444 FPS | 441 FPS |
| ultra | 424 FPS | 441 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 444 FPS | 441 FPS |
| medium | 431 FPS | 441 FPS |
| high | 386 FPS | 441 FPS |
| ultra | 322 FPS | 441 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 371 FPS | 441 FPS |
| medium | 314 FPS | 375 FPS |
| high | 276 FPS | 341 FPS |
| ultra | 218 FPS | 284 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 7730U | Xeon E5-2687W v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 444 FPS | 441 FPS |
| medium | 444 FPS | 441 FPS |
| high | 444 FPS | 441 FPS |
| ultra | 444 FPS | 441 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 444 FPS | 441 FPS |
| medium | 444 FPS | 441 FPS |
| high | 444 FPS | 441 FPS |
| ultra | 444 FPS | 441 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 444 FPS | 441 FPS |
| medium | 444 FPS | 441 FPS |
| high | 402 FPS | 415 FPS |
| ultra | 344 FPS | 348 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 7730U and Xeon E5-2687W v4


Ryzen 7 7730U
Ryzen 7 7730U
The Ryzen 7 7730U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Barcelo-U Refresh (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 17,748 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E5-2687W v4
Xeon E5-2687W v4
The Xeon E5-2687W v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 160 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 17,640 points. Launch price was $2,141.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 7730U packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E5-2687W v4 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon E5-2687W v4 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7730U versus 3.5 GHz on the Xeon E5-2687W v4 — a 25% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 7730U (base: 2 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Ryzen 7 7730U uses the Barcelo-U Refresh (2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon E5-2687W v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 7730U scores 17,748 against the Xeon E5-2687W v4's 17,640 — a 0.6% lead for the Ryzen 7 7730U. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 7730U vs 30 MB on the Xeon E5-2687W v4.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 7730U | Xeon E5-2687W v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 12 / 24+50% |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz+29% | 3.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 3 GHz+50% |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 30 MB+88% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 3 MB+500% |
| Process | 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Barcelo-U Refresh (2023) | Broadwell (2015−2019) |
| PassMark | 17,748 | 17,640 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,063 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 8,255 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 7730U uses the FP6 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2687W v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 7730U | Xeon E5-2687W v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP6 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-2400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 1536 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 4 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 40 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 7 7730U) / Yes (Xeon E5-2687W v4).
| Feature | Ryzen 7 7730U | Xeon E5-2687W v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | Yes |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












