
Ryzen 7 5800X
Popular choices:

Xeon w9-3495X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 5800X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $5,440 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $5,889 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 301.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 61.7 vs 15.4 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $5,889 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 350W, a 245W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w9-3495X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (27,712 vs 90,441).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon w9-3495X, which brings 56 cores / 112 threads and 112 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Xeon w9-3495X moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Xeon w9-3495X
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +25.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 56 cores / 112 threads, plus 112 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅366.7% more PCIe lanes (112 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.4 vs 61.7 PassMark/$ ($5,889 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ❌233.3% higher power demand at 350W vs 105W.
Ryzen 7 5800X
2020Xeon w9-3495X
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $5,440 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $5,889 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 301.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 61.7 vs 15.4 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $5,889 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 350W, a 245W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +25.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 56 cores / 112 threads, plus 112 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅366.7% more PCIe lanes (112 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w9-3495X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (27,712 vs 90,441).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon w9-3495X, which brings 56 cores / 112 threads and 112 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Xeon w9-3495X moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.4 vs 61.7 PassMark/$ ($5,889 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ❌233.3% higher power demand at 350W vs 105W.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon w9-3495X better than Ryzen 7 5800X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5800X | Xeon w9-3495X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 206 FPS | 316 FPS |
| medium | 178 FPS | 306 FPS |
| high | 146 FPS | 246 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 207 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 274 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 237 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 178 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 157 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 83 FPS | 186 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 159 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 108 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5800X | Xeon w9-3495X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 662 FPS | 384 FPS |
| medium | 558 FPS | 332 FPS |
| high | 466 FPS | 270 FPS |
| ultra | 417 FPS | 236 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 563 FPS | 308 FPS |
| medium | 493 FPS | 273 FPS |
| high | 423 FPS | 232 FPS |
| ultra | 361 FPS | 190 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 350 FPS | 181 FPS |
| medium | 308 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 288 FPS | 151 FPS |
| ultra | 250 FPS | 133 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5800X | Xeon w9-3495X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 693 FPS | 1025 FPS |
| medium | 651 FPS | 1086 FPS |
| high | 570 FPS | 1020 FPS |
| ultra | 464 FPS | 875 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 693 FPS | 1009 FPS |
| medium | 573 FPS | 913 FPS |
| high | 498 FPS | 839 FPS |
| ultra | 413 FPS | 656 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 605 FPS |
| medium | 410 FPS | 521 FPS |
| high | 363 FPS | 465 FPS |
| ultra | 302 FPS | 400 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5800X | Xeon w9-3495X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 693 FPS | 1141 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 1015 FPS |
| high | 693 FPS | 896 FPS |
| ultra | 693 FPS | 797 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 693 FPS | 924 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 809 FPS |
| high | 672 FPS | 712 FPS |
| ultra | 593 FPS | 625 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 604 FPS | 675 FPS |
| medium | 550 FPS | 602 FPS |
| high | 495 FPS | 540 FPS |
| ultra | 436 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 5800X and Xeon w9-3495X


Ryzen 7 5800X
Ryzen 7 5800X
The Ryzen 7 5800X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 27,712 points. Launch price was $449.

Xeon w9-3495X
Xeon w9-3495X
The Xeon w9-3495X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 February 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 56 cores and 112 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 105 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 90,441 points. Launch price was $5,889.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 5800X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon w9-3495X offers 56 cores / 112 threads — the Xeon w9-3495X has 48 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5800X versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w9-3495X — a 2.1% clock advantage for the Xeon w9-3495X (base: 3.8 GHz vs 1.9 GHz). The Ryzen 7 5800X uses the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon w9-3495X uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 5800X scores 27,712 against the Xeon w9-3495X's 90,441 — a 106.2% lead for the Xeon w9-3495X. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 5800X vs 105 MB on the Xeon w9-3495X.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5800X | Xeon w9-3495X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 56 / 112+600% |
| Boost Clock | 4.7 GHz | 4.8 GHz+2% |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz+100% | 1.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB | 105 MB+228% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+300% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 27,712 | 90,441+226% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 72,560 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,136 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 18,600 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 5800X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon w9-3495X uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 5800X versus DDR5-4800 on the Xeon w9-3495X — the Xeon w9-3495X supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon w9-3495X supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 5800X) vs 8 (Xeon w9-3495X). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 5800X) vs 112 (Xeon w9-3495X) — the Xeon w9-3495X offers 88 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 5800X) and W790 (Xeon w9-3495X).
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5800X | Xeon w9-3495X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR5-4800+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 4096 GB+3100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 112+367% |
Advanced Features
Only the Xeon w9-3495X supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5800X) vs true (Xeon w9-3495X). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5800X targets Desktop, Xeon w9-3495X targets Ultimate Workstation. Direct competitor: Xeon w9-3495X rivals Threadripper PRO 7995WX.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5800X | Xeon w9-3495X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | true |
| Target Use | Desktop | Ultimate Workstation |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 5800X launched at $449 MSRP, while the Xeon w9-3495X debuted at $5889. On MSRP ($449 vs $5889), the Ryzen 7 5800X is $5440 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 5800X delivers 61.7 pts/$ vs 15.4 pts/$ for the Xeon w9-3495X — making the Ryzen 7 5800X the 120.3% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5800X | Xeon w9-3495X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $449-92% | $5889 |
| Performance per Dollar | 61.7+301% | 15.4 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












