
Ryzen 7 5800X
Popular choices:

Xeon W-3375
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 5800X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $4,502 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $4,951 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 417.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 61.7 vs 11.9 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $4,951 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 270W, a 165W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (27,712 vs 59,091).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 57 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-3375, which brings 38 cores / 76 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.
Xeon W-3375
2021Why buy it
- ✅+113.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅+78.1% larger total L3 cache (57 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 38 cores / 76 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅166.7% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5800X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.9 vs 61.7 PassMark/$ ($4,951 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ❌157.1% higher power demand at 270W vs 105W.
Ryzen 7 5800X
2020Xeon W-3375
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $4,502 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $4,951 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 417.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 61.7 vs 11.9 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $4,951 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 270W, a 165W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+113.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅+78.1% larger total L3 cache (57 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 38 cores / 76 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅166.7% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (27,712 vs 59,091).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 57 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-3375, which brings 38 cores / 76 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5800X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.9 vs 61.7 PassMark/$ ($4,951 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ❌157.1% higher power demand at 270W vs 105W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 5800X better than Xeon W-3375?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5800X | Xeon W-3375 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 206 FPS | 191 FPS |
| medium | 178 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 146 FPS | 126 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 157 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 83 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 39 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5800X | Xeon W-3375 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 662 FPS | 496 FPS |
| medium | 558 FPS | 431 FPS |
| high | 466 FPS | 345 FPS |
| ultra | 417 FPS | 286 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 563 FPS | 425 FPS |
| medium | 493 FPS | 375 FPS |
| high | 423 FPS | 310 FPS |
| ultra | 361 FPS | 247 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 350 FPS | 264 FPS |
| medium | 308 FPS | 237 FPS |
| high | 288 FPS | 208 FPS |
| ultra | 250 FPS | 174 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5800X | Xeon W-3375 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 693 FPS | 1025 FPS |
| medium | 651 FPS | 937 FPS |
| high | 570 FPS | 880 FPS |
| ultra | 464 FPS | 796 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 693 FPS | 799 FPS |
| medium | 573 FPS | 710 FPS |
| high | 498 FPS | 667 FPS |
| ultra | 413 FPS | 597 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 514 FPS |
| medium | 410 FPS | 424 FPS |
| high | 363 FPS | 372 FPS |
| ultra | 302 FPS | 305 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5800X | Xeon W-3375 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 693 FPS | 932 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 847 FPS |
| high | 693 FPS | 732 FPS |
| ultra | 693 FPS | 633 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 693 FPS | 732 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 644 FPS |
| high | 672 FPS | 554 FPS |
| ultra | 593 FPS | 480 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 604 FPS | 532 FPS |
| medium | 550 FPS | 476 FPS |
| high | 495 FPS | 419 FPS |
| ultra | 436 FPS | 360 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 5800X and Xeon W-3375


Ryzen 7 5800X
Ryzen 7 5800X
The Ryzen 7 5800X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 27,712 points. Launch price was $449.

Xeon W-3375
Xeon W-3375
The Xeon W-3375 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2021-07-29. It is based on the Ice Lake-W (2021) architecture. It features 38 cores and 76 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 57 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 59,091 points. Launch price was $4,499.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 5800X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon W-3375 offers 38 cores / 76 threads — the Xeon W-3375 has 30 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5800X versus 4 GHz on the Xeon W-3375 — a 16.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 5800X (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Ryzen 7 5800X uses the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon W-3375 uses Ice Lake-W (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 5800X scores 27,712 against the Xeon W-3375's 59,091 — a 72.3% lead for the Xeon W-3375. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 5800X vs 57 MB (total) on the Xeon W-3375.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5800X | Xeon W-3375 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 38 / 76+375% |
| Boost Clock | 4.7 GHz+18% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz+52% | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB | 57 MB (total)+78% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-30% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) | Ice Lake-W (2021) |
| PassMark | 27,712 | 59,091+113% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,818 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 17,713 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 5800X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-3375 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Xeon W-3375 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 5800X) vs 8 (Xeon W-3375). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 5800X) vs 64 (Xeon W-3375) — the Xeon W-3375 offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 5800X) and Intel C621A (Xeon W-3375).
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5800X | Xeon W-3375 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA4189 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 4096 GB+3100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 64+167% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 7 5800X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon W-3375 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5800X) vs true (Xeon W-3375). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5800X targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Xeon W-3375 rivals EPYC 7543.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5800X | Xeon W-3375 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | true |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 5800X launched at $449 MSRP, while the Xeon W-3375 debuted at $4951. On MSRP ($449 vs $4951), the Ryzen 7 5800X is $4502 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 5800X delivers 61.7 pts/$ vs 11.9 pts/$ for the Xeon W-3375 — making the Ryzen 7 5800X the 135.2% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5800X | Xeon W-3375 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $449-91% | $4951 |
| Performance per Dollar | 61.7+418% | 11.9 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2021 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












