
Ryzen 7 5800X
Popular choices:

Xeon W-10855M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 5800X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +67.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 61.7 vs 103.8 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $118 MSRP).
- ❌6900% higher power demand at 105W vs 1.5W.
Xeon W-10855M
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $331 less on MSRP ($118 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 68.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 103.8 vs 61.7 PassMark/$ ($118 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 2W instead of 105W, a 104W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5800X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (12,249 vs 27,712).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 32 MB).
Ryzen 7 5800X
2020Xeon W-10855M
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +67.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $331 less on MSRP ($118 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 68.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 103.8 vs 61.7 PassMark/$ ($118 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 2W instead of 105W, a 104W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 61.7 vs 103.8 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $118 MSRP).
- ❌6900% higher power demand at 105W vs 1.5W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5800X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (12,249 vs 27,712).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 32 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 5800X better than Xeon W-10855M?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5800X | Xeon W-10855M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 206 FPS | 275 FPS |
| medium | 178 FPS | 243 FPS |
| high | 146 FPS | 204 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 175 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 235 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 187 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 153 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 83 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 132 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 102 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 89 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5800X | Xeon W-10855M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 662 FPS | 306 FPS |
| medium | 558 FPS | 280 FPS |
| high | 466 FPS | 254 FPS |
| ultra | 417 FPS | 221 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 563 FPS | 300 FPS |
| medium | 493 FPS | 245 FPS |
| high | 423 FPS | 225 FPS |
| ultra | 361 FPS | 194 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 350 FPS | 251 FPS |
| medium | 308 FPS | 207 FPS |
| high | 288 FPS | 191 FPS |
| ultra | 250 FPS | 159 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5800X | Xeon W-10855M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 693 FPS | 306 FPS |
| medium | 651 FPS | 306 FPS |
| high | 570 FPS | 306 FPS |
| ultra | 464 FPS | 306 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 693 FPS | 306 FPS |
| medium | 573 FPS | 306 FPS |
| high | 498 FPS | 306 FPS |
| ultra | 413 FPS | 306 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 306 FPS |
| medium | 410 FPS | 306 FPS |
| high | 363 FPS | 306 FPS |
| ultra | 302 FPS | 294 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5800X | Xeon W-10855M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 693 FPS | 306 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 306 FPS |
| high | 693 FPS | 306 FPS |
| ultra | 693 FPS | 306 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 693 FPS | 306 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 306 FPS |
| high | 672 FPS | 306 FPS |
| ultra | 593 FPS | 306 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 604 FPS | 306 FPS |
| medium | 550 FPS | 306 FPS |
| high | 495 FPS | 306 FPS |
| ultra | 436 FPS | 306 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 5800X and Xeon W-10855M


Ryzen 7 5800X
Ryzen 7 5800X
The Ryzen 7 5800X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 27,712 points. Launch price was $449.

Xeon W-10855M
Xeon W-10855M
The Xeon W-10855M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Comet Lake-H (2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB. L2 cache: 1.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 12,249 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 5800X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon W-10855M offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Ryzen 7 5800X has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5800X versus 4.9 GHz on the Xeon W-10855M — a 4.2% clock advantage for the Xeon W-10855M (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Ryzen 7 5800X uses the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon W-10855M uses Comet Lake-H (2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 5800X scores 27,712 against the Xeon W-10855M's 12,249 — a 77.4% lead for the Ryzen 7 5800X. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 5800X vs 12 MB on the Xeon W-10855M.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5800X | Xeon W-10855M |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16+33% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.7 GHz | 4.9 GHz+4% |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz+36% | 2.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB+167% | 12 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 1.5 MB+200% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) | Comet Lake-H (2020) |
| PassMark | 27,712+126% | 12,249 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 5800X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-10855M uses BGA1440 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5800X | Xeon W-10855M |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | BGA1440 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5800X) / not specified (Xeon W-10855M). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5800X targets Desktop.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5800X | Xeon W-10855M |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 5800X launched at $449 MSRP, while the Xeon W-10855M debuted at $118. On MSRP ($449 vs $118), the Xeon W-10855M is $331 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 5800X delivers 61.7 pts/$ vs 103.8 pts/$ for the Xeon W-10855M — making the Xeon W-10855M the 50.9% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5800X | Xeon W-10855M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $449 | $118-74% |
| Performance per Dollar | 61.7 | 103.8+68% |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












