
Ryzen 7 5800X
Popular choices:

Xeon Silver 4116T
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 5800X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +79.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+93.9% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 17 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Silver 4116T, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $449 MSRP, while Xeon Silver 4116T mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌23.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 85W.
Xeon Silver 4116T
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.
- ✅Draws 85W instead of 105W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5800X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (15,187 vs 27,712).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (17 MB vs 32 MB).
Ryzen 7 5800X
2020Xeon Silver 4116T
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +79.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+93.9% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 17 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.
- ✅Draws 85W instead of 105W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Silver 4116T, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $449 MSRP, while Xeon Silver 4116T mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌23.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 85W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5800X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (15,187 vs 27,712).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (17 MB vs 32 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 5800X better than Xeon Silver 4116T?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5800X | Xeon Silver 4116T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 206 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 178 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 146 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 138 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 68 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 83 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 34 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5800X | Xeon Silver 4116T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 662 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 558 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 466 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 417 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 563 FPS | 125 FPS |
| medium | 493 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 423 FPS | 102 FPS |
| ultra | 361 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 350 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 308 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 288 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 250 FPS | 58 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5800X | Xeon Silver 4116T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 693 FPS | 380 FPS |
| medium | 651 FPS | 380 FPS |
| high | 570 FPS | 380 FPS |
| ultra | 464 FPS | 380 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 693 FPS | 380 FPS |
| medium | 573 FPS | 380 FPS |
| high | 498 FPS | 366 FPS |
| ultra | 413 FPS | 318 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 380 FPS |
| medium | 410 FPS | 305 FPS |
| high | 363 FPS | 258 FPS |
| ultra | 302 FPS | 207 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5800X | Xeon Silver 4116T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 693 FPS | 380 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 380 FPS |
| high | 693 FPS | 380 FPS |
| ultra | 693 FPS | 380 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 693 FPS | 380 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 380 FPS |
| high | 672 FPS | 380 FPS |
| ultra | 593 FPS | 380 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 604 FPS | 380 FPS |
| medium | 550 FPS | 380 FPS |
| high | 495 FPS | 357 FPS |
| ultra | 436 FPS | 306 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 5800X and Xeon Silver 4116T


Ryzen 7 5800X
Ryzen 7 5800X
The Ryzen 7 5800X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 27,712 points. Launch price was $449.

Xeon Silver 4116T
Xeon Silver 4116T
The Xeon Silver 4116T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 16.5 MB. L2 cache: 12 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 15,187 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 5800X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Silver 4116T offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon Silver 4116T has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5800X versus 3 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4116T — a 44.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 5800X (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Ryzen 7 5800X uses the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4116T uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 5800X scores 27,712 against the Xeon Silver 4116T's 15,187 — a 58.4% lead for the Ryzen 7 5800X. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 5800X vs 16.5 MB on the Xeon Silver 4116T.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5800X | Xeon Silver 4116T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 12 / 24+50% |
| Boost Clock | 4.7 GHz+57% | 3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz+81% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB+94% | 16.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 12 MB+2300% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 27,712+82% | 15,187 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 5800X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Silver 4116T uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5800X | Xeon Silver 4116T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5800X) / not specified (Xeon Silver 4116T). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5800X targets Desktop.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5800X | Xeon Silver 4116T |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












