
Ryzen 7 5800X
Popular choices:

Xeon Phi 7290
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 5800X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +38.7% higher average FPS across 16 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 245W, a 140W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Phi 7290, which brings 72 cores / 288 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $449 MSRP, while Xeon Phi 7290 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon Phi 7290
2016Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 72 cores / 288 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5800X across 16 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (17,839 vs 27,712).
- ❌133.3% higher power demand at 245W vs 105W.
Ryzen 7 5800X
2020Xeon Phi 7290
2016Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +38.7% higher average FPS across 16 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 245W, a 140W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 72 cores / 288 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Phi 7290, which brings 72 cores / 288 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $449 MSRP, while Xeon Phi 7290 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5800X across 16 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (17,839 vs 27,712).
- ❌133.3% higher power demand at 245W vs 105W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 5800X better than Xeon Phi 7290?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5800X | Xeon Phi 7290 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 206 FPS | 177 FPS |
| medium | 178 FPS | 143 FPS |
| high | 146 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 88 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 87 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 68 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 83 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 34 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5800X | Xeon Phi 7290 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 662 FPS | 136 FPS |
| medium | 558 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 466 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 417 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 563 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 493 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 423 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 361 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 350 FPS | 87 FPS |
| medium | 308 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 288 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 250 FPS | 56 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5800X | Xeon Phi 7290 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 693 FPS | 446 FPS |
| medium | 651 FPS | 446 FPS |
| high | 570 FPS | 446 FPS |
| ultra | 464 FPS | 446 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 693 FPS | 446 FPS |
| medium | 573 FPS | 434 FPS |
| high | 498 FPS | 374 FPS |
| ultra | 413 FPS | 326 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 394 FPS |
| medium | 410 FPS | 306 FPS |
| high | 363 FPS | 259 FPS |
| ultra | 302 FPS | 209 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5800X | Xeon Phi 7290 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 693 FPS | 446 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 446 FPS |
| high | 693 FPS | 446 FPS |
| ultra | 693 FPS | 446 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 693 FPS | 446 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 446 FPS |
| high | 672 FPS | 446 FPS |
| ultra | 593 FPS | 420 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 604 FPS | 446 FPS |
| medium | 550 FPS | 405 FPS |
| high | 495 FPS | 361 FPS |
| ultra | 436 FPS | 310 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 5800X and Xeon Phi 7290


Ryzen 7 5800X
Ryzen 7 5800X
The Ryzen 7 5800X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 27,712 points. Launch price was $449.

Xeon Phi 7290
Xeon Phi 7290
The Xeon Phi 7290 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Knights Landing (2016) architecture. It features 72 cores and 288 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 245 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 17,839 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 5800X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Phi 7290 offers 72 cores / 288 threads — the Xeon Phi 7290 has 64 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5800X versus 1.7 GHz on the Xeon Phi 7290 — a 93.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 5800X (base: 3.8 GHz vs 1.5 GHz). The Ryzen 7 5800X uses the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon Phi 7290 uses Knights Landing (2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 5800X scores 27,712 against the Xeon Phi 7290's 17,839 — a 43.3% lead for the Ryzen 7 5800X. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 5800X vs 0 kB (total) on the Xeon Phi 7290.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5800X | Xeon Phi 7290 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 72 / 288+800% |
| Boost Clock | 4.7 GHz+176% | 1.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz+153% | 1.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB | 0 kB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) | Knights Landing (2016) |
| PassMark | 27,712+55% | 17,839 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 5800X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Phi 7290 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5800X | Xeon Phi 7290 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5800X) / not specified (Xeon Phi 7290). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5800X targets Desktop.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5800X | Xeon Phi 7290 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












