
Ryzen 7 5800X
Popular choices:

Xeon E5-2695 v4
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 5800X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +41.4% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 120W, a 15W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 45 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2695 v4, which brings 18 cores / 36 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $449 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2695 v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon E5-2695 v4
2016Why buy it
- ✅+40.6% larger total L3 cache (45 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 18 cores / 36 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5800X across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (18,835 vs 27,712).
Ryzen 7 5800X
2020Xeon E5-2695 v4
2016Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +41.4% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 120W, a 15W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅+40.6% larger total L3 cache (45 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 18 cores / 36 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 45 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2695 v4, which brings 18 cores / 36 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $449 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2695 v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5800X across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (18,835 vs 27,712).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 5800X better than Xeon E5-2695 v4?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5800X | Xeon E5-2695 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 206 FPS | 178 FPS |
| medium | 178 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 146 FPS | 121 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 97 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 126 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 83 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5800X | Xeon E5-2695 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 662 FPS | 210 FPS |
| medium | 558 FPS | 191 FPS |
| high | 466 FPS | 162 FPS |
| ultra | 417 FPS | 131 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 563 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 493 FPS | 164 FPS |
| high | 423 FPS | 142 FPS |
| ultra | 361 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 350 FPS | 114 FPS |
| medium | 308 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 288 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 250 FPS | 73 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5800X | Xeon E5-2695 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 693 FPS | 471 FPS |
| medium | 651 FPS | 471 FPS |
| high | 570 FPS | 471 FPS |
| ultra | 464 FPS | 471 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 693 FPS | 471 FPS |
| medium | 573 FPS | 471 FPS |
| high | 498 FPS | 471 FPS |
| ultra | 413 FPS | 471 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 447 FPS |
| medium | 410 FPS | 363 FPS |
| high | 363 FPS | 328 FPS |
| ultra | 302 FPS | 274 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5800X | Xeon E5-2695 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 693 FPS | 471 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 471 FPS |
| high | 693 FPS | 471 FPS |
| ultra | 693 FPS | 471 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 693 FPS | 471 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 471 FPS |
| high | 672 FPS | 471 FPS |
| ultra | 593 FPS | 457 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 604 FPS | 471 FPS |
| medium | 550 FPS | 467 FPS |
| high | 495 FPS | 412 FPS |
| ultra | 436 FPS | 356 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 5800X and Xeon E5-2695 v4


Ryzen 7 5800X
Ryzen 7 5800X
The Ryzen 7 5800X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 27,712 points. Launch price was $449.

Xeon E5-2695 v4
Xeon E5-2695 v4
The Xeon E5-2695 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 45 MB. L2 cache: 4.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 18,835 points. Launch price was $2,424.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 5800X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E5-2695 v4 offers 18 cores / 36 threads — the Xeon E5-2695 v4 has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5800X versus 3.3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2695 v4 — a 35% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 5800X (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Ryzen 7 5800X uses the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon E5-2695 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 5800X scores 27,712 against the Xeon E5-2695 v4's 18,835 — a 38.1% lead for the Ryzen 7 5800X. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 5800X vs 45 MB on the Xeon E5-2695 v4.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5800X | Xeon E5-2695 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 18 / 36+125% |
| Boost Clock | 4.7 GHz+42% | 3.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz+81% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB | 45 MB+41% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 4.5 MB+800% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) | Broadwell (2015−2019) |
| PassMark | 27,712+47% | 18,835 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 5800X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2695 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5800X | Xeon E5-2695 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5800X) / not specified (Xeon E5-2695 v4). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5800X targets Desktop.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5800X | Xeon E5-2695 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












