
Ryzen 7 5800X
Popular choices:

Xeon E5-2673 V3
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 5800X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +37.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2673 V3, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $449 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2673 V3 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon E5-2673 V3
2014Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5800X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,899 vs 27,712).
Ryzen 7 5800X
2020Xeon E5-2673 V3
2014Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +37.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2673 V3, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $449 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2673 V3 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5800X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,899 vs 27,712).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 5800X better than Xeon E5-2673 V3?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5800X | Xeon E5-2673 V3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 206 FPS | 160 FPS |
| medium | 178 FPS | 138 FPS |
| high | 146 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 83 FPS | 62 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5800X | Xeon E5-2673 V3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 662 FPS | 331 FPS |
| medium | 558 FPS | 299 FPS |
| high | 466 FPS | 258 FPS |
| ultra | 417 FPS | 213 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 563 FPS | 286 FPS |
| medium | 493 FPS | 262 FPS |
| high | 423 FPS | 227 FPS |
| ultra | 361 FPS | 185 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 350 FPS | 185 FPS |
| medium | 308 FPS | 169 FPS |
| high | 288 FPS | 147 FPS |
| ultra | 250 FPS | 116 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5800X | Xeon E5-2673 V3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 693 FPS | 347 FPS |
| medium | 651 FPS | 347 FPS |
| high | 570 FPS | 347 FPS |
| ultra | 464 FPS | 347 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 693 FPS | 347 FPS |
| medium | 573 FPS | 347 FPS |
| high | 498 FPS | 347 FPS |
| ultra | 413 FPS | 330 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 347 FPS |
| medium | 410 FPS | 316 FPS |
| high | 363 FPS | 281 FPS |
| ultra | 302 FPS | 232 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5800X | Xeon E5-2673 V3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 693 FPS | 347 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 347 FPS |
| high | 693 FPS | 347 FPS |
| ultra | 693 FPS | 347 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 693 FPS | 347 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 347 FPS |
| high | 672 FPS | 347 FPS |
| ultra | 593 FPS | 347 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 604 FPS | 347 FPS |
| medium | 550 FPS | 347 FPS |
| high | 495 FPS | 347 FPS |
| ultra | 436 FPS | 327 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 5800X and Xeon E5-2673 V3


Ryzen 7 5800X
Ryzen 7 5800X
The Ryzen 7 5800X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 27,712 points. Launch price was $449.

Xeon E5-2673 V3
Xeon E5-2673 V3
The Xeon E5-2673 V3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011-3. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4 2133 MHz Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 13,899 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 5800X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E5-2673 V3 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon E5-2673 V3 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5800X versus 3.1 GHz on the Xeon E5-2673 V3 — a 41% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 5800X (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Ryzen 7 5800X uses the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon E5-2673 V3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 5800X scores 27,712 against the Xeon E5-2673 V3's 13,899 — a 66.4% lead for the Ryzen 7 5800X. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 5800X vs 30 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2673 V3.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5800X | Xeon E5-2673 V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 12 / 24+50% |
| Boost Clock | 4.7 GHz+52% | 3.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz+58% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB+7% | 30 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+100% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-68% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) | Haswell-EP (2014−2015) |
| PassMark | 27,712+99% | 13,899 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 5800X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2673 V3 uses LGA2011-3 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5800X | Xeon E5-2673 V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA2011-3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5800X) / not specified (Xeon E5-2673 V3). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5800X targets Desktop.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5800X | Xeon E5-2673 V3 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












