
Ryzen 7 5800X
Popular choices:

Xeon E5-1680 v4
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 5800X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +26.0% higher average FPS across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+60% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 20 MB).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 140W, a 35W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $449 MSRP, while Xeon E5-1680 v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon E5-1680 v4
2016Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5800X across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,945 vs 27,712).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌33.3% higher power demand at 140W vs 105W.
Ryzen 7 5800X
2020Xeon E5-1680 v4
2016Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +26.0% higher average FPS across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+60% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 20 MB).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 140W, a 35W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $449 MSRP, while Xeon E5-1680 v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5800X across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,945 vs 27,712).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌33.3% higher power demand at 140W vs 105W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 5800X better than Xeon E5-1680 v4?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5800X | Xeon E5-1680 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 206 FPS | 178 FPS |
| medium | 178 FPS | 152 FPS |
| high | 146 FPS | 124 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 148 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 83 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5800X | Xeon E5-1680 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 662 FPS | 349 FPS |
| medium | 558 FPS | 347 FPS |
| high | 466 FPS | 296 FPS |
| ultra | 417 FPS | 252 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 563 FPS | 335 FPS |
| medium | 493 FPS | 303 FPS |
| high | 423 FPS | 259 FPS |
| ultra | 361 FPS | 219 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 350 FPS | 216 FPS |
| medium | 308 FPS | 195 FPS |
| high | 288 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 250 FPS | 145 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5800X | Xeon E5-1680 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 693 FPS | 349 FPS |
| medium | 651 FPS | 349 FPS |
| high | 570 FPS | 349 FPS |
| ultra | 464 FPS | 349 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 693 FPS | 349 FPS |
| medium | 573 FPS | 349 FPS |
| high | 498 FPS | 349 FPS |
| ultra | 413 FPS | 349 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 349 FPS |
| medium | 410 FPS | 349 FPS |
| high | 363 FPS | 349 FPS |
| ultra | 302 FPS | 311 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5800X | Xeon E5-1680 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 693 FPS | 349 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 349 FPS |
| high | 693 FPS | 349 FPS |
| ultra | 693 FPS | 349 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 693 FPS | 349 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 349 FPS |
| high | 672 FPS | 349 FPS |
| ultra | 593 FPS | 349 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 604 FPS | 349 FPS |
| medium | 550 FPS | 349 FPS |
| high | 495 FPS | 349 FPS |
| ultra | 436 FPS | 349 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 5800X and Xeon E5-1680 v4


Ryzen 7 5800X
Ryzen 7 5800X
The Ryzen 7 5800X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 27,712 points. Launch price was $449.

Xeon E5-1680 v4
Xeon E5-1680 v4
The Xeon E5-1680 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-EP (2016) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 13,945 points. Launch price was $1,723.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 7 5800X and Xeon E5-1680 v4 share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5800X versus 4 GHz on the Xeon E5-1680 v4 — a 16.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 5800X (base: 3.8 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Ryzen 7 5800X uses the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon E5-1680 v4 uses Broadwell-EP (2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 5800X scores 27,712 against the Xeon E5-1680 v4's 13,945 — a 66.1% lead for the Ryzen 7 5800X. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 5800X vs 20 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-1680 v4.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5800X | Xeon E5-1680 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.7 GHz+18% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz+12% | 3.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB+60% | 20 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+100% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) | Broadwell-EP (2016) |
| PassMark | 27,712+99% | 13,945 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 5800X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-1680 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5800X | Xeon E5-1680 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5800X) / not specified (Xeon E5-1680 v4). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5800X targets Desktop.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5800X | Xeon E5-1680 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












