
Ryzen 7 5800X
Popular choices:

Xeon E5-1680 v2
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 5800X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +49.7% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+28% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 25 MB).
- ✅Costs $1,274 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $1,723 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 757.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 61.7 vs 7.2 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $1,723 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 130W, a 25W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-1680 v2, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.
Xeon E5-1680 v2
2013Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅66.7% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5800X across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (12,396 vs 27,712).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.2 vs 61.7 PassMark/$ ($1,723 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ❌23.8% higher power demand at 130W vs 105W.
Ryzen 7 5800X
2020Xeon E5-1680 v2
2013Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +49.7% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+28% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 25 MB).
- ✅Costs $1,274 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $1,723 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 757.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 61.7 vs 7.2 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $1,723 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 130W, a 25W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅66.7% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-1680 v2, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5800X across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (12,396 vs 27,712).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.2 vs 61.7 PassMark/$ ($1,723 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ❌23.8% higher power demand at 130W vs 105W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 5800X better than Xeon E5-1680 v2?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5800X | Xeon E5-1680 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 206 FPS | 167 FPS |
| medium | 178 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 146 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 83 FPS | 64 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5800X | Xeon E5-1680 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 662 FPS | 310 FPS |
| medium | 558 FPS | 310 FPS |
| high | 466 FPS | 297 FPS |
| ultra | 417 FPS | 254 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 563 FPS | 310 FPS |
| medium | 493 FPS | 302 FPS |
| high | 423 FPS | 261 FPS |
| ultra | 361 FPS | 220 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 350 FPS | 217 FPS |
| medium | 308 FPS | 196 FPS |
| high | 288 FPS | 179 FPS |
| ultra | 250 FPS | 147 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5800X | Xeon E5-1680 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 693 FPS | 310 FPS |
| medium | 651 FPS | 310 FPS |
| high | 570 FPS | 310 FPS |
| ultra | 464 FPS | 310 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 693 FPS | 310 FPS |
| medium | 573 FPS | 310 FPS |
| high | 498 FPS | 310 FPS |
| ultra | 413 FPS | 310 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 310 FPS |
| medium | 410 FPS | 310 FPS |
| high | 363 FPS | 310 FPS |
| ultra | 302 FPS | 275 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5800X | Xeon E5-1680 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 693 FPS | 310 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 310 FPS |
| high | 693 FPS | 310 FPS |
| ultra | 693 FPS | 310 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 693 FPS | 310 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 310 FPS |
| high | 672 FPS | 310 FPS |
| ultra | 593 FPS | 310 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 604 FPS | 310 FPS |
| medium | 550 FPS | 310 FPS |
| high | 495 FPS | 310 FPS |
| ultra | 436 FPS | 310 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 5800X and Xeon E5-1680 v2


Ryzen 7 5800X
Ryzen 7 5800X
The Ryzen 7 5800X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 27,712 points. Launch price was $449.

Xeon E5-1680 v2
Xeon E5-1680 v2
The Xeon E5-1680 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600, DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 12,396 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 7 5800X and Xeon E5-1680 v2 share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5800X versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon E5-1680 v2 — a 18.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 5800X (base: 3.8 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Ryzen 7 5800X uses the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon E5-1680 v2 uses Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 5800X scores 27,712 against the Xeon E5-1680 v2's 12,396 — a 76.4% lead for the Ryzen 7 5800X. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 5800X vs 25 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-1680 v2.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5800X | Xeon E5-1680 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.7 GHz+21% | 3.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz+27% | 3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB+28% | 25 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+100% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-68% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) | Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) |
| PassMark | 27,712+124% | 12,396 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 8,579 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 750 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 4,500 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 5800X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-1680 v2 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 5800X versus DDR3-1866 on the Xeon E5-1680 v2 — the Ryzen 7 5800X supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E5-1680 v2 supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 5800X) vs 4 (Xeon E5-1680 v2). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 5800X) vs 40 (Xeon E5-1680 v2) — the Xeon E5-1680 v2 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 5800X) and C602,X79 (Xeon E5-1680 v2).
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5800X | Xeon E5-1680 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200+33% | DDR3-1866 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 256 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 40+67% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5800X) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon E5-1680 v2). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5800X targets Desktop, Xeon E5-1680 v2 targets Server/Workstation. Direct competitor: Xeon E5-1680 v2 rivals Core i7-4960X.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5800X | Xeon E5-1680 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Desktop | Server/Workstation |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 5800X launched at $449 MSRP, while the Xeon E5-1680 v2 debuted at $1723. On MSRP ($449 vs $1723), the Ryzen 7 5800X is $1274 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 5800X delivers 61.7 pts/$ vs 7.2 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-1680 v2 — making the Ryzen 7 5800X the 158.2% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5800X | Xeon E5-1680 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $449-74% | $1723 |
| Performance per Dollar | 61.7+757% | 7.2 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2013 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












