
Ryzen 7 5800X
Popular choices:

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 5800X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $350 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 113.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 61.7 vs 29.0 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 180W, a 75W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (23,150 vs 27,712).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 29.0 vs 61.7 PassMark/$ ($799 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ❌71.4% higher power demand at 180W vs 105W.
Ryzen 7 5800X
2020Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $350 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 113.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 61.7 vs 29.0 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 180W, a 75W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (23,150 vs 27,712).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 29.0 vs 61.7 PassMark/$ ($799 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ❌71.4% higher power demand at 180W vs 105W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 5800X better than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5800X | Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 206 FPS | 192 FPS |
| medium | 178 FPS | 168 FPS |
| high | 146 FPS | 138 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 128 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 102 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 83 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5800X | Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 662 FPS | 463 FPS |
| medium | 558 FPS | 414 FPS |
| high | 466 FPS | 358 FPS |
| ultra | 417 FPS | 319 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 563 FPS | 404 FPS |
| medium | 493 FPS | 365 FPS |
| high | 423 FPS | 317 FPS |
| ultra | 361 FPS | 274 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 350 FPS | 260 FPS |
| medium | 308 FPS | 233 FPS |
| high | 288 FPS | 218 FPS |
| ultra | 250 FPS | 190 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5800X | Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 693 FPS | 579 FPS |
| medium | 651 FPS | 579 FPS |
| high | 570 FPS | 556 FPS |
| ultra | 464 FPS | 489 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 693 FPS | 579 FPS |
| medium | 573 FPS | 516 FPS |
| high | 498 FPS | 453 FPS |
| ultra | 413 FPS | 395 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 455 FPS |
| medium | 410 FPS | 365 FPS |
| high | 363 FPS | 327 FPS |
| ultra | 302 FPS | 271 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5800X | Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 693 FPS | 579 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 579 FPS |
| high | 693 FPS | 579 FPS |
| ultra | 693 FPS | 579 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 693 FPS | 579 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 579 FPS |
| high | 672 FPS | 527 FPS |
| ultra | 593 FPS | 453 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 604 FPS | 475 FPS |
| medium | 550 FPS | 436 FPS |
| high | 495 FPS | 392 FPS |
| ultra | 436 FPS | 338 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 5800X and Ryzen Threadripper 1920X


Ryzen 7 5800X
Ryzen 7 5800X
The Ryzen 7 5800X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 27,712 points. Launch price was $449.


Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
The Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 23,150 points. Launch price was $799.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 5800X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5800X versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X — a 11.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 5800X (base: 3.8 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Ryzen 7 5800X uses the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 5800X scores 27,712 against the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X's 23,150 — a 17.9% lead for the Ryzen 7 5800X. Both processors carry 32 MB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5800X | Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 12 / 24+50% |
| Boost Clock | 4.7 GHz+12% | 4.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz+9% | 3.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB | 32 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| PassMark | 27,712+20% | 23,150 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 5800X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X uses SP3r2 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5800X | Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | SP3r2 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5800X) / not specified (Ryzen Threadripper 1920X). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5800X targets Desktop.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5800X | Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 5800X launched at $449 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X debuted at $799. On MSRP ($449 vs $799), the Ryzen 7 5800X is $350 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 5800X delivers 61.7 pts/$ vs 29.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X — making the Ryzen 7 5800X the 72.2% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5800X | Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $449-44% | $799 |
| Performance per Dollar | 61.7+113% | 29.0 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2017 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












