
Core i5-13600K
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 5700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-13600K
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +31.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while Ryzen 7 5700 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 114.5 vs 135.8 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 7 5700.
Ryzen 7 5700
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($179 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 18.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 135.8 vs 114.5 PassMark/$ ($179 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i5-13600K.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13600K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (24,317 vs 37,655).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i5-13600K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-13600K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i5-13600K
2022Ryzen 7 5700
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +31.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while Ryzen 7 5700 needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($179 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 18.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 135.8 vs 114.5 PassMark/$ ($179 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i5-13600K.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 114.5 vs 135.8 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 7 5700.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13600K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (24,317 vs 37,655).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i5-13600K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-13600K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13600K better than Ryzen 7 5700?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 7 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 281 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 152 FPS |
| high | 220 FPS | 122 FPS |
| ultra | 188 FPS | 102 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 235 FPS | 153 FPS |
| medium | 198 FPS | 126 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 85 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 75 FPS |
| high | 102 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 46 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 7 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 632 FPS | 417 FPS |
| medium | 533 FPS | 352 FPS |
| high | 450 FPS | 303 FPS |
| ultra | 416 FPS | 268 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 540 FPS | 360 FPS |
| medium | 474 FPS | 316 FPS |
| high | 403 FPS | 278 FPS |
| ultra | 351 FPS | 237 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 316 FPS | 248 FPS |
| medium | 282 FPS | 224 FPS |
| high | 269 FPS | 209 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 182 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 7 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 663 FPS | 608 FPS |
| medium | 543 FPS | 574 FPS |
| high | 477 FPS | 519 FPS |
| ultra | 414 FPS | 431 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 509 FPS |
| medium | 499 FPS | 436 FPS |
| high | 434 FPS | 392 FPS |
| ultra | 376 FPS | 326 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 441 FPS | 376 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 318 FPS |
| high | 344 FPS | 280 FPS |
| ultra | 295 FPS | 220 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 7 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 941 FPS | 608 FPS |
| medium | 941 FPS | 608 FPS |
| high | 923 FPS | 608 FPS |
| ultra | 831 FPS | 608 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 941 FPS | 608 FPS |
| medium | 850 FPS | 608 FPS |
| high | 738 FPS | 572 FPS |
| ultra | 651 FPS | 493 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 651 FPS | 520 FPS |
| medium | 588 FPS | 465 FPS |
| high | 529 FPS | 414 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 358 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13600K and Ryzen 7 5700

Core i5-13600K
Core i5-13600K
The Core i5-13600K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 37,655 points. Launch price was $319.


Ryzen 7 5700
Ryzen 7 5700
The Ryzen 7 5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Cezanne (2021−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 24,317 points. Launch price was $179.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13600K packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 7 5700 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13600K has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i5-13600K versus 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5700 — a 10.3% clock advantage for the Core i5-13600K (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Core i5-13600K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 7 5700 uses Cezanne (2021−2025) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13600K scores 37,655 against the Ryzen 7 5700's 24,317 — a 43% lead for the Core i5-13600K. L3 cache: 24 MB on the Core i5-13600K vs 16 MB on the Ryzen 7 5700.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 7 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20+75% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+11% | 4.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz | 3.7 GHz+6% |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB+50% | 16 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+300% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) | Cezanne (2021−2025) |
| PassMark | 37,655+55% | 24,317 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 11,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 8,600 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13600K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 5700 uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i5-13600K versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 5700 — the Core i5-13600K supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-13600K supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13600K) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 5700) — the Ryzen 7 5700 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel 600 series,Intel 700 series (Core i5-13600K) and A520,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 7 5700).
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 7 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600+25% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+50% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 24+20% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13600K) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5700). The Core i5-13600K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), while the Ryzen 7 5700 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13600K targets Desktop, Ryzen 7 5700 targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 5700 rivals Core i5-13400F.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 7 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 770 | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Desktop | Gaming |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-13600K launched at $329 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 5700 debuted at $179. On MSRP ($329 vs $179), the Ryzen 7 5700 is $150 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13600K delivers 114.5 pts/$ vs 135.8 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 5700 — making the Ryzen 7 5700 the 17.1% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-13600K | Ryzen 7 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329 | $179-46% |
| Performance per Dollar | 114.5 | 135.8+19% |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












