
Ryzen 7 3800XT
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 3800XT
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (23,441 vs 23,781).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $399 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌133.3% higher power demand at 105W vs 45W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H moves to FP7 and DDR5.
Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
2022Why buy it
- ✅+1.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 105W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3800XT across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
Ryzen 7 3800XT
2020Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅+1.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 105W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (23,441 vs 23,781).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $399 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌133.3% higher power demand at 105W vs 45W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H moves to FP7 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3800XT across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H better than Ryzen 7 3800XT?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3800XT | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 251 FPS |
| medium | 145 FPS | 234 FPS |
| high | 129 FPS | 197 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 169 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 147 FPS | 220 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 186 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 133 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 82 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 89 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3800XT | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 586 FPS | 441 FPS |
| medium | 502 FPS | 370 FPS |
| high | 387 FPS | 322 FPS |
| ultra | 341 FPS | 287 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 507 FPS | 370 FPS |
| medium | 439 FPS | 323 FPS |
| high | 353 FPS | 288 FPS |
| ultra | 296 FPS | 247 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 315 FPS | 255 FPS |
| medium | 275 FPS | 229 FPS |
| high | 240 FPS | 215 FPS |
| ultra | 207 FPS | 186 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3800XT | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 586 FPS | 595 FPS |
| medium | 586 FPS | 564 FPS |
| high | 554 FPS | 485 FPS |
| ultra | 459 FPS | 388 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 586 FPS | 595 FPS |
| medium | 562 FPS | 510 FPS |
| high | 485 FPS | 437 FPS |
| ultra | 405 FPS | 355 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 504 FPS | 432 FPS |
| medium | 414 FPS | 368 FPS |
| high | 367 FPS | 323 FPS |
| ultra | 301 FPS | 262 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3800XT | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 586 FPS | 595 FPS |
| medium | 586 FPS | 595 FPS |
| high | 586 FPS | 595 FPS |
| ultra | 586 FPS | 595 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 586 FPS | 595 FPS |
| medium | 586 FPS | 595 FPS |
| high | 586 FPS | 591 FPS |
| ultra | 547 FPS | 513 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 570 FPS | 536 FPS |
| medium | 510 FPS | 489 FPS |
| high | 460 FPS | 438 FPS |
| ultra | 398 FPS | 379 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 3800XT and Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H


Ryzen 7 3800XT
Ryzen 7 3800XT
The Ryzen 7 3800XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 23,441 points. Launch price was $399.


Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
The Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 23,781 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 7 3800XT and Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3800XT versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H — a 4.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H (base: 3.8 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3800XT uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H uses Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3800XT scores 23,441 against the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H's 23,781 — a 1.4% lead for the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3800XT vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3800XT | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.7 GHz | 4.9 GHz+4% |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz+15% | 3.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB+100% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | 6 nm-14% |
| Architecture | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) | Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022) |
| PassMark | 23,441 | 23,781+1% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 3800XT uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3800XT | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | FP7 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 3800XT) / not specified (Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 3800XT targets Desktop.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3800XT | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












