Core i9-7920X vs Ryzen 7 3800XT

Intel

Core i9-7920X

12 Cores24 Thrd140 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2017

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen 7 3800XT

8 Cores16 Thrd105 WWMax: 4.7 GHz2020

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i9-7920X

2017

Why buy it

  • +0.3% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3800XT across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Smaller total L3 cache (17 MB vs 32 MB).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 19.6 vs 58.7 PassMark/$ ($1,199 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
  • 33.3% higher power demand at 140W vs 105W.

Ryzen 7 3800XT

2020

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +15.4% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +93.9% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 17 MB).
  • Costs $800 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $1,199 MSRP).
  • Delivers 199.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 58.7 vs 19.6 PassMark/$ ($399 MSRP vs $1,199 MSRP).
  • Draws 105W instead of 140W, a 35W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (23,441 vs 23,508).

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 3800XT better than Core i9-7920X?
It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Ryzen 7 3800XT is ahead with a 15.4% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i9-7920X pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark. Ryzen 7 3800XT also has the bigger cache pool with 93.9% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 17 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i9-7920X is the better fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 7 3800XT is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 7 3800XT is $800 cheaper on MSRP at $399 MSRP versus $1,199 MSRP, and it gives you a 15.4% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that Core i9-7920X is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.3% better PassMark. It is also 199.6% better value on MSRP (58.7 vs 19.6 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 7 3800XT is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2017) and 93.9% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 17 MB). That makes it the safer long-term pick.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore i9-7920XRyzen 7 3800XT
1080p
low163 FPS172 FPS
medium142 FPS145 FPS
high113 FPS129 FPS
ultra96 FPS106 FPS
1440p
low140 FPS147 FPS
medium119 FPS119 FPS
high94 FPS100 FPS
ultra79 FPS82 FPS
4K
low76 FPS82 FPS
medium70 FPS72 FPS
high55 FPS58 FPS
ultra43 FPS45 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore i9-7920XRyzen 7 3800XT
1080p
low352 FPS586 FPS
medium300 FPS502 FPS
high274 FPS387 FPS
ultra243 FPS341 FPS
1440p
low315 FPS507 FPS
medium274 FPS439 FPS
high249 FPS353 FPS
ultra215 FPS296 FPS
4K
low227 FPS315 FPS
medium201 FPS275 FPS
high191 FPS240 FPS
ultra162 FPS207 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore i9-7920XRyzen 7 3800XT
1080p
low560 FPS586 FPS
medium468 FPS586 FPS
high420 FPS554 FPS
ultra366 FPS459 FPS
1440p
low507 FPS586 FPS
medium431 FPS562 FPS
high385 FPS485 FPS
ultra334 FPS405 FPS
4K
low390 FPS504 FPS
medium322 FPS414 FPS
high284 FPS367 FPS
ultra231 FPS301 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore i9-7920XRyzen 7 3800XT
1080p
low588 FPS586 FPS
medium588 FPS586 FPS
high588 FPS586 FPS
ultra588 FPS586 FPS
1440p
low588 FPS586 FPS
medium588 FPS586 FPS
high579 FPS586 FPS
ultra502 FPS547 FPS
4K
low531 FPS570 FPS
medium480 FPS510 FPS
high424 FPS460 FPS
ultra366 FPS398 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-7920X and Ryzen 7 3800XT

Intel

Core i9-7920X

The Core i9-7920X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 September 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 16.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 23,508 points. Launch price was $1,199.

AMD

Ryzen 7 3800XT

The Ryzen 7 3800XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 23,441 points. Launch price was $399.

Processing Power

The Core i9-7920X packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Ryzen 7 3800XT offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i9-7920X has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i9-7920X versus 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3800XT — a 6.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3800XT (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core i9-7920X uses the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 3800XT uses Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-7920X scores 23,508 against the Ryzen 7 3800XT's 23,441 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i9-7920X. L3 cache: 16.5 MB (total) on the Core i9-7920X vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3800XT.

FeatureCore i9-7920XRyzen 7 3800XT
Cores / Threads
12 / 24+50%
8 / 16
Boost Clock
4.4 GHz
4.7 GHz+7%
Base Clock
2.9 GHz
3.8 GHz+31%
L3 Cache
16.5 MB (total)
32 MB+94%
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)+100%
512K (per core)
Process
14 nm
7 nm, 12 nm-50%
Architecture
Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)
PassMark
23,508
23,441
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-7920X uses the LGA2066 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 3800XT uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i9-7920XRyzen 7 3800XT
Socket
LGA2066
AM4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
Yes
PCIe Lanes
24
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core i9-7920X) / AMD-V (Ryzen 7 3800XT). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 3800XT targets Desktop.

FeatureCore i9-7920XRyzen 7 3800XT
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Desktop
💰

Value Analysis

The Core i9-7920X launched at $1199 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 3800XT debuted at $399. On MSRP ($1199 vs $399), the Ryzen 7 3800XT is $800 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-7920X delivers 19.6 pts/$ vs 58.7 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 3800XT — making the Ryzen 7 3800XT the 99.9% better value option.

FeatureCore i9-7920XRyzen 7 3800XT
MSRP
$1199
$399-67%
Performance per Dollar
19.6
58.7+199%
Release Date
2017
2020