
Core i9-7920X
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 3800XT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i9-7920X
2017Why buy it
- ✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3800XT across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (17 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 19.6 vs 58.7 PassMark/$ ($1,199 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ❌33.3% higher power demand at 140W vs 105W.
Ryzen 7 3800XT
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +15.4% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+93.9% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 17 MB).
- ✅Costs $800 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $1,199 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 199.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 58.7 vs 19.6 PassMark/$ ($399 MSRP vs $1,199 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 140W, a 35W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (23,441 vs 23,508).
Core i9-7920X
2017Ryzen 7 3800XT
2020Why buy it
- ✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +15.4% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+93.9% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 17 MB).
- ✅Costs $800 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $1,199 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 199.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 58.7 vs 19.6 PassMark/$ ($399 MSRP vs $1,199 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 140W, a 35W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3800XT across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (17 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 19.6 vs 58.7 PassMark/$ ($1,199 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ❌33.3% higher power demand at 140W vs 105W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (23,441 vs 23,508).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 3800XT better than Core i9-7920X?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i9-7920X | Ryzen 7 3800XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 129 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 106 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 140 FPS | 147 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 76 FPS | 82 FPS |
| medium | 70 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 45 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i9-7920X | Ryzen 7 3800XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 352 FPS | 586 FPS |
| medium | 300 FPS | 502 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 387 FPS |
| ultra | 243 FPS | 341 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 315 FPS | 507 FPS |
| medium | 274 FPS | 439 FPS |
| high | 249 FPS | 353 FPS |
| ultra | 215 FPS | 296 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 227 FPS | 315 FPS |
| medium | 201 FPS | 275 FPS |
| high | 191 FPS | 240 FPS |
| ultra | 162 FPS | 207 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i9-7920X | Ryzen 7 3800XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 560 FPS | 586 FPS |
| medium | 468 FPS | 586 FPS |
| high | 420 FPS | 554 FPS |
| ultra | 366 FPS | 459 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 507 FPS | 586 FPS |
| medium | 431 FPS | 562 FPS |
| high | 385 FPS | 485 FPS |
| ultra | 334 FPS | 405 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 390 FPS | 504 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 414 FPS |
| high | 284 FPS | 367 FPS |
| ultra | 231 FPS | 301 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i9-7920X | Ryzen 7 3800XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 588 FPS | 586 FPS |
| medium | 588 FPS | 586 FPS |
| high | 588 FPS | 586 FPS |
| ultra | 588 FPS | 586 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 588 FPS | 586 FPS |
| medium | 588 FPS | 586 FPS |
| high | 579 FPS | 586 FPS |
| ultra | 502 FPS | 547 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 531 FPS | 570 FPS |
| medium | 480 FPS | 510 FPS |
| high | 424 FPS | 460 FPS |
| ultra | 366 FPS | 398 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-7920X and Ryzen 7 3800XT

Core i9-7920X
Core i9-7920X
The Core i9-7920X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 September 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 16.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 23,508 points. Launch price was $1,199.


Ryzen 7 3800XT
Ryzen 7 3800XT
The Ryzen 7 3800XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 23,441 points. Launch price was $399.
Processing Power
The Core i9-7920X packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Ryzen 7 3800XT offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i9-7920X has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i9-7920X versus 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3800XT — a 6.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3800XT (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core i9-7920X uses the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 3800XT uses Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-7920X scores 23,508 against the Ryzen 7 3800XT's 23,441 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i9-7920X. L3 cache: 16.5 MB (total) on the Core i9-7920X vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3800XT.
| Feature | Core i9-7920X | Ryzen 7 3800XT |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24+50% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 4.7 GHz+7% |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz | 3.8 GHz+31% |
| L3 Cache | 16.5 MB (total) | 32 MB+94% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 23,508 | 23,441 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-7920X uses the LGA2066 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 3800XT uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i9-7920X | Ryzen 7 3800XT |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2066 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 24 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core i9-7920X) / AMD-V (Ryzen 7 3800XT). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 3800XT targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i9-7920X | Ryzen 7 3800XT |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Desktop |
Value Analysis
The Core i9-7920X launched at $1199 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 3800XT debuted at $399. On MSRP ($1199 vs $399), the Ryzen 7 3800XT is $800 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-7920X delivers 19.6 pts/$ vs 58.7 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 3800XT — making the Ryzen 7 3800XT the 99.9% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-7920X | Ryzen 7 3800XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1199 | $399-67% |
| Performance per Dollar | 19.6 | 58.7+199% |
| Release Date | 2017 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











