
Ryzen 5 5600X
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 PRO 220
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Why buy it
- ✅+9.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 PRO 220 across 45 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 PRO 220 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌983.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 6W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 PRO 220 moves to FP7/FP7r2 and DDR5.
Ryzen 5 PRO 220
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.4% higher average FPS across 45 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 6W instead of 65W, a 59W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7/FP7r2 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,889 vs 21,845).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Ryzen 5 PRO 220
2025Why buy it
- ✅+9.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.4% higher average FPS across 45 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 6W instead of 65W, a 59W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7/FP7r2 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 PRO 220 across 45 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 PRO 220 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌983.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 6W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 PRO 220 moves to FP7/FP7r2 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,889 vs 21,845).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 PRO 220 better than Ryzen 5 5600X?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600X | Ryzen 5 PRO 220 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 203 FPS | 259 FPS |
| medium | 174 FPS | 237 FPS |
| high | 140 FPS | 199 FPS |
| ultra | 107 FPS | 171 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 169 FPS | 229 FPS |
| medium | 141 FPS | 191 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 155 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 137 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 76 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 47 FPS | 92 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600X | Ryzen 5 PRO 220 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 464 FPS | 386 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 320 FPS |
| high | 324 FPS | 284 FPS |
| ultra | 291 FPS | 248 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 397 FPS | 324 FPS |
| medium | 334 FPS | 280 FPS |
| high | 290 FPS | 255 FPS |
| ultra | 253 FPS | 218 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 263 FPS | 243 FPS |
| medium | 226 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 201 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 169 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600X | Ryzen 5 PRO 220 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 546 FPS | 497 FPS |
| medium | 473 FPS | 497 FPS |
| high | 432 FPS | 497 FPS |
| ultra | 358 FPS | 497 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 508 FPS | 497 FPS |
| medium | 413 FPS | 497 FPS |
| high | 375 FPS | 497 FPS |
| ultra | 312 FPS | 430 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 348 FPS | 484 FPS |
| medium | 292 FPS | 425 FPS |
| high | 255 FPS | 362 FPS |
| ultra | 199 FPS | 299 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 5600X | Ryzen 5 PRO 220 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 546 FPS | 497 FPS |
| medium | 546 FPS | 497 FPS |
| high | 546 FPS | 497 FPS |
| ultra | 546 FPS | 497 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 546 FPS | 497 FPS |
| medium | 546 FPS | 497 FPS |
| high | 546 FPS | 497 FPS |
| ultra | 524 FPS | 497 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 529 FPS | 497 FPS |
| medium | 484 FPS | 497 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 441 FPS |
| ultra | 379 FPS | 377 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 5600X and Ryzen 5 PRO 220


Ryzen 5 5600X
Ryzen 5 5600X
The Ryzen 5 5600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 21,845 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 5 PRO 220
Ryzen 5 PRO 220
The Ryzen 5 PRO 220 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP7r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 MB + 16 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 19,889 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 5 5600X and Ryzen 5 PRO 220 share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600X versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 — a 6.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 (base: 3.7 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Ryzen 5 5600X uses the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 uses Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 5600X scores 21,845 against the Ryzen 5 PRO 220's 19,889 — a 9.4% lead for the Ryzen 5 5600X. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 5 5600X vs 16 MB on the Ryzen 5 PRO 220.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600X | Ryzen 5 PRO 220 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz | 4.9 GHz+7% |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz+16% | 3.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB+100% | 16 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 6 MB+1100% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) | Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025) |
| PassMark | 21,845+10% | 19,889 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 5600X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 uses FP7/FP7r2 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600X | Ryzen 5 PRO 220 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | FP7/FP7r2 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5600X) / not specified (Ryzen 5 PRO 220). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 5600X targets Desktop.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600X | Ryzen 5 PRO 220 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 5 5600X launched at $299 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 debuted at $0. On MSRP ($299 vs $0), the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 is $299 cheaper.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 5600X | Ryzen 5 PRO 220 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 73.1 | — |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












