Core i5-12400F vs Ryzen 5 PRO 220

Intel

Core i5-12400F

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2022

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen 5 PRO 220

6 Cores12 Thrd6 WWMax: 4.9 GHz2025

Popular choices:

i5-12400F

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-12400F

2022

Why buy it

  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 5 PRO 220.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 PRO 220 across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (19,532 vs 19,889).
  • Launch MSRP is still $174 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 PRO 220 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 983.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 6W.

Ryzen 5 PRO 220

2025

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +3.5% higher average FPS across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Draws 6W instead of 65W, a 59W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 PRO 220 better than Core i5-12400F?
Yes. Ryzen 5 PRO 220 is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 3.5% average FPS lead across 5 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.8% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 5 PRO 220 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 3.5% more average FPS across 5 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 PRO 220 is the better fit. You are getting 1.8% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 5 PRO 220 is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-12400F makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Ryzen 5 PRO 220 is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $174 MSRP, and it gives you a 3.5% average FPS lead across 5 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-12400F is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (112.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 5 PRO 220 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2022) and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 6/12. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore i5-12400FRyzen 5 PRO 220
1080p
low183 FPS259 FPS
medium168 FPS237 FPS
high139 FPS199 FPS
ultra119 FPS171 FPS
1440p
low153 FPS229 FPS
medium132 FPS191 FPS
high106 FPS155 FPS
ultra89 FPS137 FPS
4K
low87 FPS159 FPS
medium81 FPS134 FPS
high64 FPS104 FPS
ultra49 FPS92 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore i5-12400FRyzen 5 PRO 220
1080p
low471 FPS386 FPS
medium397 FPS320 FPS
high341 FPS284 FPS
ultra301 FPS248 FPS
1440p
low407 FPS324 FPS
medium351 FPS280 FPS
high309 FPS255 FPS
ultra265 FPS218 FPS
4K
low282 FPS243 FPS
medium248 FPS214 FPS
high229 FPS201 FPS
ultra196 FPS169 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore i5-12400FRyzen 5 PRO 220
1080p
low488 FPS497 FPS
medium488 FPS497 FPS
high488 FPS497 FPS
ultra488 FPS497 FPS
1440p
low488 FPS497 FPS
medium488 FPS497 FPS
high485 FPS497 FPS
ultra434 FPS430 FPS
4K
low442 FPS484 FPS
medium389 FPS425 FPS
high337 FPS362 FPS
ultra274 FPS299 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore i5-12400FRyzen 5 PRO 220
1080p
low488 FPS497 FPS
medium488 FPS497 FPS
high488 FPS497 FPS
ultra488 FPS497 FPS
1440p
low488 FPS497 FPS
medium488 FPS497 FPS
high488 FPS497 FPS
ultra473 FPS497 FPS
4K
low488 FPS497 FPS
medium450 FPS497 FPS
high391 FPS441 FPS
ultra330 FPS377 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-12400F and Ryzen 5 PRO 220

Intel

Core i5-12400F

The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.

AMD

Ryzen 5 PRO 220

The Ryzen 5 PRO 220 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP7r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 MB + 16 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 19,889 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

Both the Core i5-12400F and Ryzen 5 PRO 220 share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 — a 10.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i5-12400F uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 uses Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12400F scores 19,532 against the Ryzen 5 PRO 220's 19,889 — a 1.8% lead for the Ryzen 5 PRO 220. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F vs 16 MB on the Ryzen 5 PRO 220.

FeatureCore i5-12400FRyzen 5 PRO 220
Cores / Threads
6 / 12
6 / 12
Boost Clock
4.4 GHz
4.9 GHz+11%
Base Clock
2.5 GHz
3.2 GHz+28%
L3 Cache
18 MB (total)+13%
16 MB
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)
6 MB+380%
Process
Intel 7 nm
4 nm-43%
Architecture
Alder Lake-S (2022)
Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025)
PassMark
19,532
19,889+2%
Cinebench R23 Multi
12,380
Geekbench 6 Single
1,700
Geekbench 6 Multi
657
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-12400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 uses FP7/FP7r2 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i5-12400FRyzen 5 PRO 220
Socket
LGA1700
FP7/FP7r2
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F) / not specified (Ryzen 5 PRO 220). Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600.

FeatureCore i5-12400FRyzen 5 PRO 220
Integrated GPU
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Gaming Performance/Value
💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-12400F launched at $174 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 debuted at $0. On MSRP ($174 vs $0), the Ryzen 5 PRO 220 is $174 cheaper.

FeatureCore i5-12400FRyzen 5 PRO 220
MSRP
$174
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
112.3
Release Date
2022
2025