
Ryzen 5 8640U
Popular choices:

Ryzen Embedded V3C48
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 8640U
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +42.3% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 45W, a 17W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 760M, while Ryzen Embedded V3C48 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Ryzen Embedded V3C48
2022Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 8640U across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (20,203 vs 20,274).
- ❌60.7% higher power demand at 45W vs 28W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 8640U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 5 8640U
2023Ryzen Embedded V3C48
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +42.3% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 45W, a 17W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 760M, while Ryzen Embedded V3C48 needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 8640U across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (20,203 vs 20,274).
- ❌60.7% higher power demand at 45W vs 28W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 8640U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 8640U better than Ryzen Embedded V3C48?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 8640U | Ryzen Embedded V3C48 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 261 FPS | 174 FPS |
| medium | 237 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 199 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 230 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 190 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 155 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 103 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 91 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 8640U | Ryzen Embedded V3C48 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 372 FPS | 331 FPS |
| medium | 309 FPS | 281 FPS |
| high | 272 FPS | 240 FPS |
| ultra | 236 FPS | 196 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 313 FPS | 286 FPS |
| medium | 270 FPS | 251 FPS |
| high | 244 FPS | 217 FPS |
| ultra | 207 FPS | 177 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 234 FPS | 206 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 187 FPS |
| high | 191 FPS | 167 FPS |
| ultra | 161 FPS | 134 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 8640U | Ryzen Embedded V3C48 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 507 FPS | 505 FPS |
| medium | 507 FPS | 505 FPS |
| high | 507 FPS | 505 FPS |
| ultra | 507 FPS | 444 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 507 FPS | 505 FPS |
| medium | 507 FPS | 459 FPS |
| high | 507 FPS | 416 FPS |
| ultra | 443 FPS | 359 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 493 FPS | 412 FPS |
| medium | 435 FPS | 320 FPS |
| high | 372 FPS | 283 FPS |
| ultra | 308 FPS | 227 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 8640U | Ryzen Embedded V3C48 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 507 FPS | 505 FPS |
| medium | 507 FPS | 505 FPS |
| high | 507 FPS | 505 FPS |
| ultra | 507 FPS | 505 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 507 FPS | 505 FPS |
| medium | 507 FPS | 505 FPS |
| high | 507 FPS | 505 FPS |
| ultra | 507 FPS | 461 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 507 FPS | 486 FPS |
| medium | 501 FPS | 435 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 391 FPS |
| ultra | 380 FPS | 339 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 8640U and Ryzen Embedded V3C48


Ryzen 5 8640U
Ryzen 5 8640U
The Ryzen 5 8640U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 20,274 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen Embedded V3C48
Ryzen Embedded V3C48
The Ryzen Embedded V3C48 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt (2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 20,203 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 8640U packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen Embedded V3C48 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen Embedded V3C48 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 8640U versus 3.8 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded V3C48 — a 25.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 8640U (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Ryzen 5 8640U uses the Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen Embedded V3C48 uses Rembrandt (2022) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 8640U scores 20,274 against the Ryzen Embedded V3C48's 20,203 — a 0.4% lead for the Ryzen 5 8640U. Both processors carry 16 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 8640U | Ryzen Embedded V3C48 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz+29% | 3.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+6% | 3.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-33% | 6 nm |
| Architecture | Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025) | Rembrandt (2022) |
| PassMark | 20,274 | 20,203 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 10,675 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,519 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 10,308 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 8640U uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Embedded V3C48 uses FP7 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 8640U | Ryzen Embedded V3C48 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP8 | FP7 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR5x-7500 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (SVM) (Ryzen 5 8640U) / not specified (Ryzen Embedded V3C48). The Ryzen 5 8640U includes integrated graphics (Radeon 760M), while the Ryzen Embedded V3C48 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 8640U targets Productivity. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 8640U rivals Core i5-1335U.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 8640U | Ryzen Embedded V3C48 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Radeon 760M | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V (SVM) | — |
| Target Use | Productivity | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












