Ryzen 5 8640U vs Ryzen Embedded V3C48

AMD

Ryzen 5 8640U

6 Cores12 Thrd28 WWMax: 4.9 GHz2023

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen Embedded V3C48

8 Cores16 Thrd45 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2022

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 5 8640U

2023

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +42.3% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Draws 28W instead of 45W, a 17W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 760M, while Ryzen Embedded V3C48 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Ryzen Embedded V3C48

2022

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 8640U across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
    • Lower PassMark (20,203 vs 20,274).
    • 60.7% higher power demand at 45W vs 28W.
    • No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 8640U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Ryzen 5 8640U better than Ryzen Embedded V3C48?
    Yes. Ryzen 5 8640U is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 42.3% average FPS lead across 2 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.4% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 5 8640U is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 42.3% more average FPS across 2 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 8640U is the better fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Ryzen 5 8640U still looks like the safer overall buy. Ryzen 5 8640U is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 42.3% average FPS lead across 2 shared CPU game tests in our data.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Ryzen 5 8640U is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2022) and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 8/16. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

    Games Benchmarks

    Paired with RTX 4090

    To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

    Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

    Path of Exile 2

    Path of Exile 2

    PresetRyzen 5 8640URyzen Embedded V3C48
    1080p
    low261 FPS174 FPS
    medium237 FPS139 FPS
    high199 FPS113 FPS
    ultra171 FPS90 FPS
    1440p
    low230 FPS144 FPS
    medium190 FPS113 FPS
    high155 FPS90 FPS
    ultra137 FPS72 FPS
    4K
    low159 FPS66 FPS
    medium133 FPS55 FPS
    high103 FPS44 FPS
    ultra91 FPS35 FPS
    Counter-Strike 2

    Counter-Strike 2

    PresetRyzen 5 8640URyzen Embedded V3C48
    1080p
    low372 FPS331 FPS
    medium309 FPS281 FPS
    high272 FPS240 FPS
    ultra236 FPS196 FPS
    1440p
    low313 FPS286 FPS
    medium270 FPS251 FPS
    high244 FPS217 FPS
    ultra207 FPS177 FPS
    4K
    low234 FPS206 FPS
    medium206 FPS187 FPS
    high191 FPS167 FPS
    ultra161 FPS134 FPS
    League of Legends

    League of Legends

    PresetRyzen 5 8640URyzen Embedded V3C48
    1080p
    low507 FPS505 FPS
    medium507 FPS505 FPS
    high507 FPS505 FPS
    ultra507 FPS444 FPS
    1440p
    low507 FPS505 FPS
    medium507 FPS459 FPS
    high507 FPS416 FPS
    ultra443 FPS359 FPS
    4K
    low493 FPS412 FPS
    medium435 FPS320 FPS
    high372 FPS283 FPS
    ultra308 FPS227 FPS
    Valorant

    Valorant

    PresetRyzen 5 8640URyzen Embedded V3C48
    1080p
    low507 FPS505 FPS
    medium507 FPS505 FPS
    high507 FPS505 FPS
    ultra507 FPS505 FPS
    1440p
    low507 FPS505 FPS
    medium507 FPS505 FPS
    high507 FPS505 FPS
    ultra507 FPS461 FPS
    4K
    low507 FPS486 FPS
    medium501 FPS435 FPS
    high442 FPS391 FPS
    ultra380 FPS339 FPS

    Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 8640U and Ryzen Embedded V3C48

    AMD

    Ryzen 5 8640U

    The Ryzen 5 8640U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 20,274 points. Launch price was $299.

    AMD

    Ryzen Embedded V3C48

    The Ryzen Embedded V3C48 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt (2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 20,203 points. Launch price was $299.

    Processing Power

    The Ryzen 5 8640U packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen Embedded V3C48 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen Embedded V3C48 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 8640U versus 3.8 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded V3C48 — a 25.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 8640U (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Ryzen 5 8640U uses the Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen Embedded V3C48 uses Rembrandt (2022) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 8640U scores 20,274 against the Ryzen Embedded V3C48's 20,203 — a 0.4% lead for the Ryzen 5 8640U. Both processors carry 16 MB (total) of L3 cache.

    FeatureRyzen 5 8640URyzen Embedded V3C48
    Cores / Threads
    6 / 12
    8 / 16+33%
    Boost Clock
    4.9 GHz+29%
    3.8 GHz
    Base Clock
    3.5 GHz+6%
    3.3 GHz
    L3 Cache
    16 MB (total)
    16 MB (total)
    L2 Cache
    1 MB (per core)+100%
    512 kB (per core)
    Process
    4 nm-33%
    6 nm
    Architecture
    Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025)
    Rembrandt (2022)
    PassMark
    20,274
    20,203
    Cinebench R23 Multi
    10,675
    Geekbench 6 Single
    2,519
    Geekbench 6 Multi
    10,308
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Ryzen 5 8640U uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Embedded V3C48 uses FP7 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeatureRyzen 5 8640URyzen Embedded V3C48
    Socket
    FP8
    FP7
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 4.0+33%
    PCIe 3.0
    Max RAM Speed
    LPDDR5x-7500
    Max RAM Capacity
    256 GB
    RAM Channels
    2
    ECC Support
    Yes
    PCIe Lanes
    20
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Virtualization: AMD-V (SVM) (Ryzen 5 8640U) / not specified (Ryzen Embedded V3C48). The Ryzen 5 8640U includes integrated graphics (Radeon 760M), while the Ryzen Embedded V3C48 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 8640U targets Productivity. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 8640U rivals Core i5-1335U.

    FeatureRyzen 5 8640URyzen Embedded V3C48
    Integrated GPU
    Yes
    IGPU Model
    Radeon 760M
    Unlocked
    No
    AVX-512
    Yes
    Virtualization
    AMD-V (SVM)
    Target Use
    Productivity