
Ryzen 5 8640U
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 8640U
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (10,675 vs 12,814).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G.
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
2020Why buy it
- ✅+20% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 5 8640U.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 8640U across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $309 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 8640U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 8640U moves to FP8 and DDR5.
Ryzen 5 8640U
2023Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅+20% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 5 8640U.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (10,675 vs 12,814).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 8640U across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $309 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 8640U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 8640U moves to FP8 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 8640U better than Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 8640U | Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 261 FPS | 215 FPS |
| medium | 237 FPS | 173 FPS |
| high | 199 FPS | 138 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 102 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 230 FPS | 185 FPS |
| medium | 190 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 155 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 89 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 77 FPS |
| high | 103 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 91 FPS | 47 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 8640U | Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 371 FPS | 381 FPS |
| medium | 309 FPS | 317 FPS |
| high | 272 FPS | 279 FPS |
| ultra | 236 FPS | 243 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 313 FPS | 330 FPS |
| medium | 270 FPS | 285 FPS |
| high | 244 FPS | 255 FPS |
| ultra | 207 FPS | 216 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 234 FPS | 265 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 238 FPS |
| high | 191 FPS | 216 FPS |
| ultra | 161 FPS | 186 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 8640U | Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 507 FPS | 506 FPS |
| medium | 507 FPS | 506 FPS |
| high | 507 FPS | 506 FPS |
| ultra | 507 FPS | 506 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 507 FPS | 506 FPS |
| medium | 507 FPS | 506 FPS |
| high | 507 FPS | 468 FPS |
| ultra | 443 FPS | 408 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 493 FPS | 439 FPS |
| medium | 435 FPS | 374 FPS |
| high | 372 FPS | 331 FPS |
| ultra | 308 FPS | 266 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 8640U | Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 507 FPS | 506 FPS |
| medium | 507 FPS | 506 FPS |
| high | 507 FPS | 506 FPS |
| ultra | 507 FPS | 506 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 507 FPS | 506 FPS |
| medium | 507 FPS | 506 FPS |
| high | 507 FPS | 506 FPS |
| ultra | 507 FPS | 506 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 507 FPS | 506 FPS |
| medium | 501 FPS | 493 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 429 FPS |
| ultra | 380 FPS | 368 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 8640U and Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G


Ryzen 5 8640U
Ryzen 5 8640U
The Ryzen 5 8640U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 20,274 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
The Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 July 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 20,227 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 8640U packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 8640U versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G — a 10.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 8640U (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Ryzen 5 8640U uses the Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G uses Renoir (2020−2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 8640U scores 20,274 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G's 20,227 — a 0.2% lead for the Ryzen 5 8640U. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 10,675 vs 12,814 (18.2% advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,519 vs 1,627, a 43% lead for the Ryzen 5 8640U that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 10,308 vs 7,556 (30.8% advantage for the Ryzen 5 8640U). L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 8640U vs 8 MB on the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 8640U | Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz+11% | 4.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz | 3.6 GHz+3% |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total)+100% | 8 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-43% | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025) | Renoir (2020−2023) |
| PassMark | 20,274 | 20,227 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 10,675 | 12,814+20% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,519+55% | 1,627 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 10,308+36% | 7,556 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 8640U uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR5x-7500 on the Ryzen 5 8640U versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G — the Ryzen 5 8640U supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 5 8640U supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Ryzen 5 8640U) vs 16 (Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G) — the Ryzen 5 8640U offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (Ryzen 5 8640U) and Socket AM4 (Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G).
| Feature | Ryzen 5 8640U | Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP8 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR5x-7500+25% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB+100% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20+25% | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Ryzen 5 8640U supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (SVM) (Ryzen 5 8640U) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon 760M (Ryzen 5 8640U) and Radeon Vega 8 (Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 8640U targets Productivity. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 8640U rivals Core i5-1335U.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 8640U | Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Radeon 760M | Radeon Vega 8 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V (SVM) | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Productivity | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












