
M3 Pro 11-Core
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 8400F
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
M3 Pro 11-Core
2023Why buy it
- β +1.3% higher PassMark.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 8400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Ryzen 5 8400F
2024Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +11.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark (24,554 vs 24,861).
- βLaunch MSRP is still $303 MSRP, while M3 Pro 11-Core mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
M3 Pro 11-Core
2023Ryzen 5 8400F
2024Why buy it
- β +1.3% higher PassMark.
Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +11.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 8400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark (24,554 vs 24,861).
- βLaunch MSRP is still $303 MSRP, while M3 Pro 11-Core mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 8400F better than M3 Pro 11-Core?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | M3 Pro 11-Core | Ryzen 5 8400F |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 182 FPS | 178 FPS |
| medium | 146 FPS | 151 FPS |
| high | 119 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 102 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 146 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 115 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 84 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 56 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 45 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | M3 Pro 11-Core | Ryzen 5 8400F |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 399 FPS | 374 FPS |
| medium | 339 FPS | 316 FPS |
| high | 293 FPS | 278 FPS |
| ultra | 256 FPS | 238 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 352 FPS | 326 FPS |
| medium | 309 FPS | 282 FPS |
| high | 270 FPS | 255 FPS |
| ultra | 230 FPS | 214 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 255 FPS | 243 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 215 FPS |
| high | 210 FPS | 198 FPS |
| ultra | 184 FPS | 165 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | M3 Pro 11-Core | Ryzen 5 8400F |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 622 FPS | 614 FPS |
| medium | 622 FPS | 614 FPS |
| high | 622 FPS | 614 FPS |
| ultra | 593 FPS | 614 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 622 FPS | 614 FPS |
| medium | 515 FPS | 603 FPS |
| high | 458 FPS | 522 FPS |
| ultra | 400 FPS | 446 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 452 FPS | 492 FPS |
| medium | 356 FPS | 431 FPS |
| high | 310 FPS | 369 FPS |
| ultra | 248 FPS | 303 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | M3 Pro 11-Core | Ryzen 5 8400F |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 622 FPS | 614 FPS |
| medium | 622 FPS | 614 FPS |
| high | 622 FPS | 614 FPS |
| ultra | 621 FPS | 614 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 622 FPS | 614 FPS |
| medium | 622 FPS | 614 FPS |
| high | 540 FPS | 614 FPS |
| ultra | 469 FPS | 601 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 494 FPS | 610 FPS |
| medium | 443 FPS | 548 FPS |
| high | 396 FPS | 490 FPS |
| ultra | 342 FPS | 426 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of M3 Pro 11-Core and Ryzen 5 8400F
M3 Pro 11-Core
M3 Pro 11-Core
The M3 Pro 11-Core is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 30 October 2023 (2 years ago). It features 11 cores and 11 threads. Base frequency is 2.748 GHz, with boost up to 4.06 GHz. Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: none. Memory support: LPDDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 24,861 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 5 8400F
Ryzen 5 8400F
The Ryzen 5 8400F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Phoenix (2023β2024) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 24,554 points. Launch price was $170.
Processing Power
The M3 Pro 11-Core packs 11 cores / 11 threads, while the Ryzen 5 8400F offers 6 cores / 12 threads β the M3 Pro 11-Core has 5 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.06 GHz on the M3 Pro 11-Core versus 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 5 8400F β a 14.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 8400F (base: 2.748 GHz vs 4.2 GHz). The Ryzen 5 8400F is built on the Phoenix (2023β2024) architecture. In PassMark, the M3 Pro 11-Core scores 24,861 against the Ryzen 5 8400F's 24,554 β a 1.2% lead for the M3 Pro 11-Core.
| Feature | M3 Pro 11-Core | Ryzen 5 8400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 11 / 11+83% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.06 GHz | 4.7 GHz+16% |
| Base Clock | 2.748 GHz | 4.2 GHz+53% |
| L3 Cache | β | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | β | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 3 nm-25% | 4 nm |
| Architecture | β | Phoenix (2023β2024) |
| PassMark | 24,861+1% | 24,554 |
Memory & Platform
The M3 Pro 11-Core uses the none socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 5 8400F uses AM5 (PCIe 4.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | M3 Pro 11-Core | Ryzen 5 8400F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | none | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












